1. Reliability of a New Instrument for Measuring Plantarflexor Muscle Strength 
Maria Örtqvist, PT, MSc, Elena M. Gutierrez-Farewik, PhD, Markus Farewik, BSc, Anna Jansson, PT, PhD, Åsa Bartonek, PT, PhD, Eva Broström, PT, PhD 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 88, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
The SMC.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2 Test design. Abbreviation: ID, isokinetic dynamometer.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
Differences in mean plantarflexor peak torque between the 2 different testing positions with knee angles of 60° and 30° in the SMC during session 3.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
Bland-Altman plots29 showing the differences between session 1 in the SMC and session 3 (SMC) for plantarflexor peak torque plotted against their mean for each subject, to check for any systematic variations between the 2 test sessions. (A) Adult group (n=23); (B) children group (n=15); (C) adult group (n=23); and (D) children group (n=14).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

6. Fig 5
Bland-Altman plots29 showing the differences between session 2 (isokinetic dynamometer) and session 3 in the SMC for plantarflexor peak torque plotted against their mean for each subject, to check for any systematic variations between the 2 different strength measuring devices. (A) Adult group (n=23) and (B) children group (n=15).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions