Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRatna Halim Modified over 6 years ago
1
Implementing Portfolio Management: Issues, Insights, and Answers?
1999 SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium Implementing Portfolio Management: Issues, Insights, and Answers? John I. Howell Portfolio Decisions, Inc. Roger N. Anderson Columbia Enterprise Systems © Portfolio Decisions, Inc
2
Three Issues for Consideration:
1. Why use Portfolio Management? 2. Who is the End User? 3. What are some Critical Success Factors for Implementing Portfolio Management? Portfolio management can be applied in many ways. Companies who wish to implement portfolio management must be clear as to why they are embarking on this process. Companies which have tried to initiate Portfolio Management processes to be everything to everyone usually fail. Understanding who the end-user is will be critical to the success of an implementation program. The determination of the end user must be consistent with the answer to the first question. Failure to synchronize the Why and Who issues will nearly always guarantee failure. Several factors emerge as being critical to the successful implementation process. We will cite just a few in this presentation to stimulate this line of thought. © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
3
Why Implement Portfolio Management?
Because Current Performances are all over the Map! © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
4
1. Why use Portfolio Management?
Quantify volatility in performance, Test feasibility of strategies, Identify significant and detrimental projects, Define unique value of investments, Evaluate investment options, & Monitor business performance. The ultimate perspective of a portfolio based analysis is the total performance of the company, business or business unit using the tool. The quantitative use of uncertainty data allow us to quantitatively describe the volatility of aggregate business. The description defines performance on an annual basis for a 15 year time frame and characterizes performance in terms of the metrics which are consistent with your strategy. The system can be used to test different strategies. Evaluations include feasibility testing, volatility under economic scenarios, and project dependence analysis. Projects can be evaluated for significance. Strategic projects are projects which MUST be included to arrive at a feasible solution. Detrimental projects will prevent the portfolio from being feasible if they are selected. All other projects are OPTIONS which can contribute but do not have to. Ultimately, you can use Portfolio Management as a means of monitoring you business on a regular basis. © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
5
Do NOT use Portfolio Management to:
“FIND THE ANSWER”! Instead, use it to make better Decisions, and Improve the Probability of consistently meeting your Strategic Goals. The ultimate use of portfolio management is to improve business performance. Improving business performance does not just mean having one good year. Improved business performance means consistently meeting performance goals year after year. The dynamics of the global economy, the commodity nature of our product and the intense competition makes consistent business performance something many oil and gas companies simply long for. People should not use portfolio management as the SILVER BULLET. It does not exist. Using this approach to find THE ANSWER usually lead a company to ruin. Portfolio Management provides a way to LEARN about the dynamics of the business. The more we understand these DYNAMICS, the better prepared we are to manage our business and achieve consistent business performance. © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
6
© Portfolio Decisions, Inc. 1999 1999 SPE HEES Dallas
2. Who is the End User? Portfolio Management relies on input and interaction with: Geoscientists -Engineers Planners -Portfolio Managers BUT, the end user is the Decision-Maker who is responsible for managing business performance. Portfolio management is critically dependent upon input from business and technical staff in the organization but the ultimate users is the decision maker. Decision makers are the ones who have ultimate accountability and responsibility for the performance of their business. Most decision-makers have come from the technical and engineering ranks where they managed decisions on a project by project basis. It’s no wonder that many struggle with the challenges of managing the total business performance. Portfolio management provides the insights decision-makers need to manage the aggregate business performance. Their decisions may reference individual projects but the impacts are assessed at the total portfolio level. Thus, the decision maker is always basing decisions on how the decision-unit will affect the ultimate performance of his business. © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
7
3. What are some Critical Success Factors?
1. Establish a Clear Portfolio Process, 2. Set Commonly understood, Clear Strategy, 3. Develop Strong Relationships among key staff (the soft side), & 4. Always aim for High Quality Decision Framing. Portfolio Management uses lots of information generated and understood by many people. This complex system requires a systematic approach if the information is to lead to high quality decisions. Defining a process for portfolio management is critical to getting alignment and efficiency with the analysis. Without a process, each analysis is done differently and ultimately the quality of input and decision quality deteriorates rapidly. A companies strategy is the guiding light for portfolio analysis. The strategy characterizes how a company will ultimately “WIN”. If the strategy is not clear, then the portfolio process is like a ship on the ocean without a rudder. You will never win if you don’t know how your define victory. The complexity of the information used in portfolio management means that the decision-maker must have a strong interdependent relationship with sources for business and technical data. Portfolio perspectives allow the decision maker to engage in dialogues with these team members which are meaningful to the final decision. Decision Framing is a way of consistently using the complex array if results generated from the portfolio model. Without clear decision framing, the decision maker will likely revert to old habits of decision-making. © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
8
Critical Success Factors: 1. The Process
© Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
9
Critical Success Factors: 2. The Strategy
Production 50 100 150 200 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 Reserves 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 NCF -200 -100 300 400 Expl Expense 250 350 Net Income 600 800 Capital Strategy is how you define success (the target bars above)! © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
10
Critical Success Factors: 3. Relationships (The Soft Side)
Maps & Reservoir Economics Dialogue Decisions & Business Performance Monitoring = Engineers and Geo-scientists Discussion Strategy & Goals = The Decision-Maker = Planning Staff & Portfolio Manager © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
11
Critical Success Factors: 4. Decision Framing
… since Portfolio Management doesn’t give THE answer, and … since decisions may depend on both quantitative and subjective inputs gathered from others (via relationships), How then do you put all the information together to reach clear and consistent decisions? Answer: By Properly Framing the Decision © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
12
Critical Success Factors: 4. Decision Framing
1. Clearly Define the Problem to be solved, 2. Clearly Define the Decision Criteria, 3. Generate Realistic Options, & only then, 4. Evaluate the Options relative to the Decision Criteria, & 5. Make Decisions. © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
13
© Portfolio Decisions, Inc. 1999 1999 SPE HEES Dallas
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 1. Clearly Define the Problem Are you testing strategies, or defining/allocating performance targets? Are you adjusting targets and constraints within a fixed project set? Are you evaluating project plans, or investment/divestment options? Are you adjusting projects to meet fixed targets and constraints? Are you monitoring your business performance? Are you computing probability of meeting targets with fixed projects? © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
14
© Portfolio Decisions, Inc. 1999 1999 SPE HEES Dallas
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 2. Clearly Define the Decision Criteria Quantitative: Does the Investment being discussed Contribute? Does the Project under consideration add Value? Does the Project improve the Probability of meeting performance metrics? How bad can “poor performance” be? Why is the Project Valued? Subjective: What are the implications and tradeoffs for the investment? What are the political/commercial impacts? © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
15
© Portfolio Decisions, Inc. 1999 1999 SPE HEES Dallas
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 2. Clearly Define the Decision Criteria (cont) Production 50 100 150 200 250 300 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 Reserves 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 NCF -400 -200 400 600 800 Expl Expense 350 Net Income -600 Capital © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
16
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 3
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 3. Generate Realistic Options Efficient Frontier Does Project 16 contribute positive value, and how much? © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
17
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 4
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 4. Evaluate Options in terms of Decision Criterion Efficient Frontier Comparison 1200 With Project 16 1000 Original Portfolio 800 Portfolio Value Risk 600 400 200 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 Value Does Project 16 add value? How Much? © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
18
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 4
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 4. Evaluate Options in terms of Decision Criterion (cont) Net Income 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Net Cash Flow Capital Production Original w/ New Acquisition Exploration Expense Reserves Probability of meeting performance metrics/year? © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
19
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 4
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 4. Evaluate Options in terms of Decision Criterion (cont) © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas How bad can “poor performance” be?
20
© Portfolio Decisions, Inc. 1999 1999 SPE HEES Dallas
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 4. Evaluate Options in terms of Decision Criterion (cont) Why is a project valued by the portfolio? © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
21
Generic E&P Portfolio
22
Critical Success Factors: Decision Framing 5. Make the Decision
Quantitative Factors: Project 16 portfolio value is $250MM in a 5.5B portfolio, + Project 16 reduces risk for all portfolio values, + Project 16 improves probability of meeting near-term NCF and Net Income targets, BUT Project 16 guarantees failure to meet near term capital target, Project 16 inclusion reduces probability of meeting mid- and long-term reserves and production targets. Subjective Factors: Project 16 requires we maintain operations in an area we do not currently operate in, + Project 16 has no opportunity for expansion. © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
23
Critical Success Factors 5. Make the Decision
Project 16 clearly adds value, But, current price concerns suggest income and cash flow summaries may be optimistic, So, near-term improvements in income and cash flow outweigh long-term degradation in production and reserves, & Lack of expansion opportunities is overcome with reduced dependence on exploration programs, so MAKE THE INVESTMENT! © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
24
Summary: A Perfect Implementation Environment
Uses Portfolio Management to improve the probability of consistently meeting your strategic goals. All portfolio information comes together at the Decision-Maker. Successful implementation depends upon process, strategy, culture, and in particular, proper decision framing. © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
25
Summary: A Perfect Implementation Environment
A knowledgeable and engaged Decision-Maker + A well defined Business Strategy + Consistently described risk and uncertainty for all investments, + A clearly defined decision process! © Portfolio Decisions, Inc SPE HEES Dallas
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.