1. Harvesting Early Good or Bad?
Eleanor McWilliams, MSc, RPF
J&E McWilliams & Associates Ltd.
Associated Strategic Consulting Experts Inc.
February 27, 2014

2. It depends on… Objectives Timber supply constraints Market conditions
Age class distribution
Species composition
Climate change strategies
Accuracy of managed stand yield projections …
Climate change – I’m an analyst, risk analysis and gaming is fun (take a shot at the we think we can predict everything attitude). Not an expert in climate change, but what about looking at risk of losing a certain proportion of stands if we are planning on holding them in the queue for later? What about the option of being able to change species or seed sources earlier? Faster cycle on assisted migration. If shorter is better what types of stands do we need to be establishing now to give us that option for an earlier harvest?

3. Climate Change…

4. Managed Stand Growth
With the harvest history on the coast and the MPB infestation in the interior, timber supply forecasting is increasingly sensitive to estimates of current and future managed stand growth.
This in turn has focused the spotlight on the details of predicting managed stand growth. For example:
Early height growth
OAFs
Forest health impacts

5. Early height growth Improvements are required to:
Resolve inconsistent joins between height growth above and below breast height.
Provide models users the ability to input local height growth information.

6. Early Height Growth
nearly all the site index curves recommended for application in BC are based on age at breast-height. The site index models predict directly the height-age trends from 1.3 m and higher. Juvenile height-growth trends below 1.3 m must be derived from some other source.

7. Years to Breast Height
Intent is to allow users to directly enter years to breast height if local information is known.
Currently can get at this in TIPSY by “playing” with the stock height option, but this is clumsy and potentially misleading.
Adjustments have been made to site index functions to allow the input of fractional years to breast height (e.g. 4.2).
In the future, surveys could include a measurement of where 1.3 m falls between whorls.

8. OAFs Used to net down the potential yields predicted by TASS/TIPSY
TASS/TIPSY predict regular (self-thinning) mortality, not irregular mortality due to pests or abiotic damage.
Special runs can be done to mimic pests or abiotic damage and some disease modules have been developed (e.g. Rotsim).
Default OAF values come from comparison of research plot data to inventory data.
Default OAF values were chosen to get best estimates of yields at rotation.

9. OAFs

10. Monitoring Required
We need better (in many cases any!) information on how our regenerated stands are actually growing.
Need it to adjust our predictions and fine tune our understanding of stand development to improve management for timber production and other values.
Options include:
Mid-rotation surveys
Network of permanent plots
In the ideal world, both.

11. Why monitoring is required
To demonstrate sustainability and fulfill responsibilities
To provide critical information for AAC determinations
To check site productivity estimates
To provide forest health incident and impact information
To continually improve basic silviculture
To provide feedback on stocking standards
To ensure wise investments in incremental silviculture
To ensure projected gains from tree improvement are realized
To provide baseline data for climate change studies
To ensure accurate carbon accounting
To realize the full value from our research

12. Monitoring in other Jurisdictions
USDA Forest Inventory & Analysis program maintains an approximately 5 km grid across forest land in the U.S. (both private and public).
Approximately 125,000 PSPs, of which 20% are measured each year.
If BC was to become a US State, assuming about 2/3 of BC is forested, USDA FIA would establish about 25,000 PSPs across the province.
If we adopted the Swedish model we would establish about 10,000 PSP on a grid across the province.

13. Most forest management decisions, including when to harvest, are based in part on assumptions of future stand growth.