Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMaurice Jennings Modified over 6 years ago
1
What is the clinical utility of a 6-month computed tomography in the follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair patients? Michael R. Go, MD, Joel E. Barbato, MD, Robert Y. Rhee, MD, Michel S. Makaroun, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © 2008 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Protocol for computed tomography (CT) surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), including number and types of endoleak at each follow-up patients in group I, group II, and those with abnormal results on 1-month CT scans. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2008 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Proximal attachment site in the group I patient who developed a type 1 leak at (A) 1 month, (B) 6 months, and (C) at 1 year when the leak developed. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2008 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 The 6-month computed tomography scan of the group I patient who developed main body thrombosis showed no evidence of stenosis at the narrowest portion of the aorta. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2008 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
5
Fig 4 The 6-month computed tomography scan of the group I patient who developed limb thrombosis showed no evidence of stenosis at the narrowest portion of the aorta. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2008 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.