Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

L.A. Hamel1, M. Benoit1, B. Dönmez2, J.R. Macri2, M.L. McConnell2,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "L.A. Hamel1, M. Benoit1, B. Dönmez2, J.R. Macri2, M.L. McConnell2,"— Presentation transcript:

1 L.A. Hamel1, M. Benoit1, B. Dönmez2, J.R. Macri2, M.L. McConnell2,
T. Narita3, J.M. Ryan2, M. Whidholm2 1 Département de Physique, Université de Montréal 2 Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham 3 Departement of Physics, College of the Holy Cross

2 2N instead of N2 channels Rely on good charge sharing between X and Y Previous model (225 m pitch) has shown poor sharing Improved simulation for device optimization

3

4

5 interaction sites from GEANT4
Energy deposited at each site is supposed a small 3-D Gaussian e-h distribution

6

7

8

9 Field maps from Comsol multiphysics.
Results shown for the 225 µm model, with a grid.

10 Weighting potentials

11 To download the animation :

12 225µm model

13 225µm model

14 225µm model Experimental Result (Co 57) Simulated result 122 keV, Co57

15 225µm model Ba-133 Cs-137

16 150 microns pitch

17 150µm model Co-57

18 Combination of repulsion, diffusion, trapping, and accurate field and weighting potentials yields to better predictions Reproduces results for 225 µm pitch Predicts good sharing for 150 µm pitch


Download ppt "L.A. Hamel1, M. Benoit1, B. Dönmez2, J.R. Macri2, M.L. McConnell2,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google