Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKristin Grant Modified over 5 years ago
1
Aerospace Research and Technology Centre, Barcellona - SPAIN
Florence, January 28, SIGRAV School in Cosmology and INFN Formation School Signals and interferometric response functions in the framework of gravitational waves from extended theories of gravity Christian Corda Aerospace Research and Technology Centre, Barcellona - SPAIN
2
Contents General features of the stochastic background in standard GR and WMAP bound Extension to f(R) theories of gravity Gravitational waves from f(R) theories The Scalar –Tensor Theory The “magnetic” component of gravitational waves
3
Possible target of GW experiments
Stochastic background of GW General assumptions: isotropic, stationary, gaussian Primordial: Parametric amplification of vacuum fluctuations during inflation, phase transitions non-equilibrium processes, topological defects Astrophysical: Large populations of binary systems of compact objects (wd,ns,bh), hot, young rapidly spinning NS …
4
Most important observative bound: the WMAP one
WMAP bound old COBE bound (Allen, Turner '94)
5
Production mechanism and characteristic amplitude of the primordial GW stochastic background
Amplification of vacuum fluctuations (Grishchuk ‘75; Starobinski ‘78; Allen ' Capozziello, Corda and De Laurentis in f(R) Gravity, 2007)
6
Detection of the primordial background is very difficult
Cross-correlation between the two LIGO WMAP bound old COBE bound We hope in advanced projects and in LISA
7
Dark Matter and Dark Energy Problems
Only 5% of the mass in the Universe is known
8
Gravitation: is it a mystery?
Astrophysicists often perform computations with Newtonian theory! Is our understanding of Gravitation definitive? No one can say that GR is wrong! But, is it definitive?
9
Is Einstein’s picture definitive?
In presence of a gravitational field lo space-time is curved Deflection of the light (Eddington 1919) REAL POSITION STELLA SUN APPARENT POSITION MOON EARTH Is Einstein’s picture definitive? Einstein attempted a modification: Generalized Theory of Gravitation
10
Is there an intrinsic curvature?
Generic function of Ricci Curvature f(R) Ricci Curvature R General Relativity General Relativity + intrinsic curvature Extended theories of Gravitation: f(R) theories and scalar tensor theories which are coupled by conformal transformations
11
Tuning with observations
Capozziello, Cardone, Francaviglia Gen. Rel. Grav. 38, 5 (2006)
12
Correct theory from observations
Interferometric detection of gravitational waves One more polarization is present with respect standard general relativity
13
The relic GWs – f(R) connection
Amplification of vacuum fluctuations re-analyzed in the context of f(R) gravity theories using a conformal treatment Two important results 1) the purely tensorial part of GWs is conformally invariant 2) the amplitude of the background is tuned by the correct theory of gravity (i.e. the correct theory of gravity is printed in relic GWs)
14
The Virgo-Minigrail cross-correlation for scalar relic GWs
One more polarization (scalar) in f(R) theories of gravity and Scalar-Tensor Gravity massless case: the overlap reduction function
15
Overlap reduction function very small, but a maximum is present
16
f(R) theories Einstein-Hilbert action Modified action
Observation of gravitational waves in the “Lorenz” gauge No transverse – traceless gauge
17
The massive mode gives a longitudinal effect which implies a longitudinal response function
Relation mass-velocity
19
The Scalar-Tensor Gravity
Massless case: invariance of the signal in three different gauges Massless case: the frequency-dependent angular pattern The small massive case is totally equivalent to f(R) theories Generalized previous results analyzed in the low- frequencies approximation
20
The response of an interferometer
The massless case: TT gauge extended to scalar waves The response of an interferometer Literature: low-frequencies approximation Method of “bouncing photon” : the variation of space-time due to the scalar field is computed in all the travel of the photon
21
Gauge invariance between the three gauges well known in the literature: the TT gauge,
the gauge of the local observer and the SNN gauge
22
Total frequency-dependent response function
Low frequencies Agrees with
23
Scalar pattern of Virgo
at high frequencies Scalar pattern of Virgo at low frequencies
24
The “magnetic components” of gravitational waves
Importance of “magnetic components”: 1) Equations rewritten in different notations and spatial dependence 2) Used the “bouncing photon method” 3) Generalized previous results with more precise response functions using the full theory of GWs
25
Coordinate transformation: analysis in the gauge of the local observer
Line element in the TT gauge: Coordinate transformation
26
Equations of motion for test masses
Not gauge artefact: equation directly obtained from geodesic deviation in the work of Baskaran and Grishchuk
27
Equations of motion for the pure “magnetic” components
First polarization Second polarization
28
Coordinate transformation
Distance Variation in distance
29
Magnetic pattern “plus” Virgo 8000 Hz
30
Magnetic pattern “cross” LIGO 8000 Hz
31
The full theory of gravitational waves in the TT gauge: total response function for the + polarization Low frequencies
32
Similar analysis: total response function for the polarization
Low frequencies
33
Low-frequency angular pattern (“plus” polarization)
High-frequency angular pattern (“plus” polarization)
34
Final Remarks General features in standard GR and WMAP bound of relic GWs Connection between f(R) gravity and relic GWs Analised the Virgo-Minigrail cross-correlation for the third component in the massless case
35
Realistic possibility to detect gravitational waves from extended theories
The investigation of the scalar component of GW could be a tool to discriminate among several theories of gravity Importance of the “magnetic” components and more accurate response functions at high frequencies
36
References Christian Corda – “Magnetic” components of gravitational waves and response functions of interferometers – in “Interferometers, Research, Technology and applications” review commissioned by Nova Science Publishers, in press (2008), preprint on arXiv: Christian Corda J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP04(2007)009 doi: /14757516/2007/04/009 (2007) Christian Corda Astropart. Phys. 27, 539549 (2007) Christian Corda Mod. Phys. Lett. A, vol. 22, No. 16 (2007) pp. 11671173 Christian Corda Intern. Journ. Mod. Phys. D, 16, 8, 14971517 (2007) Christian Corda Intern. Journ. Mod. Phys. A ,22, 13, 23612381 (2007) Christian Corda Astropart. Phys. 28, 2, 247250 ( 2007) Christian Corda – Intern. Journ. Mod. Phys. A, 22, 26, 48594881 (2007) Christian Corda – Mod. Phys. Lett. A, vol. 22, No. 23 (2007) pp. 17271735 Christian Corda arXiv: accepted by Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. A Christian Corda – Gen.Rel. Grav.00017701 (Print) 15729532 (Online) (2008) preprint on arXiv: Christian Corda – Astrophysics and Space Science 0004640X (Print) 1572946X (Online) Christian Corda Astropart. Phys., doi: /j.astrpartphys Avaible on line 10 September 2008 Salvatore Capozziello, Christian Corda and Maria Felicia De Laurentis – Phys. Lett. B /j.physletb (2008) Salvatore Capozziello and Christian Corda Intern. Journ. Mod. Phys. D, Vol. 15, No. 7 (2006) 11191150 Salvatore Capozziello, Christian Corda and Maria Felicia De Laurentis Modern Physics Letters A, Vol. 22, No. 15 (2007) 10971104 Salvatore Capozziello, Christian Corda and Maria Felicia De Laurentis Modern Physics Letters A, Vol. 22, No 2655 (2007)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.