Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Cocoa ME+1 vs PG James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 9-March-2009
2
Data used 0T 3.8T PG Distancemeter 16-Nov average DCOPS 11-Nov event
Link from Celso 3.8T Distancemeter 1-4 Nov average DCOPS Oct event PG PG within disk UR-0058 (2006) (Oleg cleaned it up) Supplementary UR-0103 (2008) PG of disk UR-0124 (after Craft) James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
3
Fit Ring (average of all chambers) Position Deviations from Ideal
0T-Ideal X Y Z 3.8T- Ideal +1/3 .74 -.76 -.94 .79 -.68 -2.18 +1/2 .98 -.98 1.59 1.10 -.97 -6.27 PG (disk) .58 -1.37 0.57 NA James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
4
Cocoa Fit Ideal vs DDD Only 6 entries. Cocoa Ideal minus DDD geometry
Ring 3 only Mean microns RMS X-xddd -17 69 Y-yddd -55 52 Z-zddd -7 1 James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
5
Blessing for ME+1/3 chamber Z?
0T Pos mm 0T Tilt mrad 3.8T Pos mm 3.8T Tilt mrad ME+1/3_03 -0.5 1.53 ME+1/3_09 -0.83 1.99 ME+1/3_14 -1.14 1.09 ME+1/3_20 0.41 2.63 ME+1/3_27 6870 -1.93 -0.69 Average -0.8 1.3 Δ from nominal -0.85mm -0.8mrad -4.08mm 1.3mrad James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
6
Displays now available
Omitting lines illustrating chamber surface Triangles show the slope well enough PG information not displayed Diagram is very cluttered already HSLM1-5 are animated to show 0 to 3.8T shifts HSLM6 has bad data for the DCOPS at 3.8T and bad Z information for the distancemeter HSLM3 probably has bad distancemeter data also James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
7
Distancemeter and dists Chamber surface estimates Red=Real Green=Sim
DCOPS dowels Chamber surface estimates Red=Real Green=Sim ME12 ASPD IR target MAB ASPD ASPD P4 Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
8
Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
9
Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
10
Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
11
Animated James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
12
3.8T is bad IR target obscured, Z is bad
James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
13
BACKUP MATERIAL James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
14
0T ME+1/2 Cocoa vs Ideal 6 measured centers Overall rotation
and translation is removed cm James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
15
0T ME+1/3 Cocoa vs Ideal 5 measured centers Overall rotation
and translation is removed cm James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
16
3.8T ME+1/2 Cocoa vs Ideal 6 measured centers Overall rotation
and translation is removed cm James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
17
3.8T ME+1/3 Cocoa vs Ideal 5 measured centers Overall rotation
and translation is removed cm James N. Bellinger 9-March-2009
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.