1. The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
Corrections in the Community, 5e
25 February 2019
Chapter 10
Intermediate Sanctions
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 2 — Instructions: Language of the Computer

2. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
BOX 10.1
Intermediate sanctions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

3. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
FIGURE 10.2
Models of ISP programs.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

4. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
BOX 10.4
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

5. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
FIGURE 10.4
Ohio day-reporting study: Rearrest rates.
Source: Latessa , E., Travis , L., Holsinger , A., & Hartman, J. (1998). Evaluation of Ohio’s Pilot Day Reporting Program Final Report. Cincinnati: Division of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

6. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
FIGURE 10.5
Ohio day-reporting study: Incarceration rates.
Source: Latessa , E., Travis , L., Holsinger , A., & Hartman, J. (1998). Evaluation of Ohio’s Pilot Day Reporting Program Final Report. Cincinnati: Division of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

7. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
FIGURE 10.6
Electronic monitoring devices in use.
Source: National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (1999). Keeping Track of Electronic
Monitoring. Washington, DC: NLECTC . Data for 2003 estimated.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

8. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
FIGURE 10.7
Key decision points where electronic monitoring (EM) is being used.
Source: Bureau of Justice Assistance (1989) . Electronic Monitoring in Intensive Probation and Parole Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

9. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
FIGURE 10.8
Program termination from electronic monitoring program.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

10. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
BOX 10.7
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

11. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
FIGURE 10.11
Rearrest rates for residents discharged from community correctional facilities in Texas: two- year follow-up (percent).
Source: Community Corrections Facilities Outcome Study, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, January 1999.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

12. Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 10
TABLE 10.3
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved