1. Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 51-59 (March 2016)
Sexually dimorphic proteinuria in Wistar rats: Relevance to clinical models 
Eseigbe Christian Imafidon, Rufus Ojo Akomolafe, Abraham Ayodele Oladele 
Pathophysiology 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (March 2016)
DOI: /j.pathophys
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1 Experimental protocol.
n=number of rats per group; AC=after acclimatization; and *=point at which rats were sacrificed.
Pathophysiology  , 51-59DOI: ( /j.pathophys )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Bar chart depicting sexual dimorphism in total urine protein (mg/mL), body weight (g) and protein/100g bodyweight (mg) of the rats.
Each value represents mean±S.E.M (n=5); *=significantly different from group 1 (p<0.05); #=significantly different from group 2 (p<0.05); §=significantly different from group 3 (p<0.05).
Pathophysiology  , 51-59DOI: ( /j.pathophys )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Bar chart depicting sexual dimorphism in the (a) circumference of Bowman’s capsule (μm); (b) circumference of glomerulus (μm); (c) diameter of Bowman’s capsule (μm); and (d) diameter of glomerulus (μm) of the rats.
Each value represents mean±S.E.M (n=5); *=significantly different from group 1 (p<0.05); #=significantly different from group 2 (p<0.05); §=significantly different from group 3 (p<0.05).
Pathophysiology  , 51-59DOI: ( /j.pathophys )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
Bar chart depicting sexual dimorphism in the diameter of Bowman’s capsular space (μm) of the rats.
Each value represents mean±S.E.M (n=5); *=significantly different from group 1 (p<0.05); #=significantly different from group 2 (p<0.05); §=significantly different from group 3 (p<0.05).
Pathophysiology  , 51-59DOI: ( /j.pathophys )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
Bar charts depicting sexual dimorphism in the relative kidney weight (%) of the rats.
Each value represents mean±S.E.M (n=5); *=significantly different from group 1 (p<0.05); #=significantly different from group 2 (p<0.05); §=significantly different from group 3 (p<0.05).
Pathophysiology  , 51-59DOI: ( /j.pathophys )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

7. Fig. 6
Bar charts depicting sexual dimorphism in (a) plasma creatinine (mg/dL); (b) urine creatinine (mg/dL); and (c) level of creatinine clearance (×10−3mL/min) in the rats.
Each value represents mean±S.E.M (n=5); *=significantly different from group 1 (p<0.05); #=significantly different from group 2 (p<0.05); §=significantly different from group 3 (p<0.05).
Pathophysiology  , 51-59DOI: ( /j.pathophys )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

8. Fig. 7
Bar charts depicting sexual dimorphism in urine protein to creatinine ratio (mg/g) of the rats.
Each value represents mean±S.E.M (n=5); *=significantly different from group 1 (p<0.05); #=significantly different from group 2 (p<0.05); §=significantly different from group 3 (p<0.05).
Pathophysiology  , 51-59DOI: ( /j.pathophys )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

9. Fig. 8
Photomicrographs of the kidney of the rats showing apparently intact renal corpuscles (magnification ×100).
G1=group 1 (male 1); G2=group 2 (female 1); G3=group 3 (male 2); and G4=group 4 (female 2).
Pathophysiology  , 51-59DOI: ( /j.pathophys )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions