Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLyric Thornberry Modified over 10 years ago
1
THE MODEL CITY BENCHMARK (TOCE) 3RD IMPACT Workshop November 5-8, 2003 Université Catholique de Louvain Lovain-la-Neuve, Belgium
2
TEST CASE: 1A vs 1B
3
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 2)
4
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 3)
5
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 4)
6
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 5)
7
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 6)
8
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 7)
9
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 8)
10
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 9)
11
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 10) wake
12
TEST CASE: 2A vs 2B
13
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 2)
14
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 3)
15
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 4)
16
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 5) Chaneled probes are less accurate
17
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 6)
18
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 7)
19
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 8)
20
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 9)
21
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 10)
22
TEST CASE: 3A vs 3B
23
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 2)
24
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 3)
25
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 4)
26
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 5)
27
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 6)
28
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 7)
29
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 8)
30
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 9)
31
TEST CASE: 4A vs 4B vs 4C
32
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 2) Bottom elevation Solid walls High friction
33
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 3) Solid walls Bottom elevation High friction
34
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 4) Solid wallsBottom elevation High friction
35
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 5) Solid walls Bottom elevation High friction
36
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 6) Solid wallsBottom elevation High friction
37
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 7) Solid wallsBottom elevation High friction
38
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 8) Solid wallsBottom elevation High friction
39
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 9) Solid walls Bottom elevation High friction
40
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 10) Solid walls Bottom elevation High friction
41
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 10)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.