1. Self-Care Among Social Work educators

2. Topic and research question
Self-care practices and policies within the University of Nebraska at Omaha’s Grace Abbott School of Social Work (GASSW) and how each individual who teaches self-care practices it.
Help instructors in GASSW to identify strong and weak points in their self-care practices/policies in the school and in each individual’s lives as well.
Research Question: How do social work educators’ self- care practices affect the way that they educate on self- care?

3. Literature Review
Self-care is imperative for social worker professional performance, overall well- being, and reducing the risk of compassion fatigue and burnout rates.
Social work educators need to “walk the walk”
Several beneficial dimensions of self-care
Physical, psychological, emotional, spiritual, professional
The literature underlined that while social workers tend to tell others that they should practice self-care, many do not implement it adequately in their own lives.
social workers valued self-care in combating stress, though social workers are not always taught to effectively practice self-care through their education or employers.
Students and practitioners deserve educators and employers that not only promote and teach effective self-care practices, but exemplify them
There are major gaps in the literature concerning how social work educators’ own self-care practices affect how they educate on self-care. More research in this domain would be valuable to social work educators, students, and the social work profession equally.

4. Methods Post-test only survey
Assess self-care habits as well as frequency of and approaches to teaching self-care in social work classrooms among social work educators in GASSW.
15 questions on survey
Nonprobability sampling
Cross-sectional design
Paper and electronic surveys sent to a total of 27 full-time and adjunct GASSW instructors
19 surveys completed and turned in (n=19)
Six Likert scale questions were used to determine instructors’ personal self-care practices. One open-ended question assessed the instructors’ opinions concerning their feelings on encouragement and motivation of self-care practices within GASSW and another open-ended question assessed examples of how instructors taught self-care in the classroom. Additional close-ended questions were asked to determine whether instructors taught self-care in the classroom, instructors’ total years teaching, instructors’ ages, and whether instructors were currently in a paid social work position. Two other Likert scale questions assessed frequency of self-care taught in the classroom and whether instructors felt their students absorbed their self-care teachings. One check-all question assessed what aspects of self-care instructors teach in the classroom.

5. Qualitative findings
Question about feelings of motivation or encouragement of self-care within GASSW
Themes:
Educator autonomy & flexibility of time
Time off, own schedule, work from home
Colleague support
Easy to find support among colleagues
Lack of encouragement or motivation within GASSW
Little information or resources, wished for more informal & formal gatherings, no real conversation about it
“we are allowed a lot of flexibility with our time which makes it easy to take care of oneself.”
One respondent said that they “think we do a great job of supporting and helping one another” and another said that “the Social Work Department and staff are always supportive and caring.”
One respondent expressed that there is “a lot of talk about self-practice but no real or practical tactics given to ensure those can happen.”

6. Quantitative Findings - demographics
Over half of survey respondents reported having five or less years of teaching experience (53%, n=10), with the remainder being disbursed between 6 to 10 years (5%, n=1), 11 to 15 years (11%, n=2), 16 to 20 years (11%, n=2), and 21 years or more (21%, n=4).

7. Quantitative Findings - demographics
The age options for respondents ranged from 30 years or younger to 61 years or older. Respondents ages ranged from 31 to 35 years to 61 years or older. The age category that generated the most responses was 31 to 35 years old (42%, n=8) and the lowest was 30 or younger (0%, n=0). The remaining respondents fell in between with 46 to 50 years old, 51 to 55 years old, and 56 to 60 years old being on the lower end (5%, n=1), 36 to 40 years old and 41 to 45 years old being in the middle (11%, n=2), and 61 years old or older being on the higher end (21%, n=4).

8. Quantitative Findings - demographics
Over half of respondents reported not currently having a paid social work position alongside their employment as an instructor (58%, n=11). The remaining respondents reported currently being in a paid social work position (42%, n=8).

9. Quantitative Findings
Close to 80% of respondents reported teaching self-care in the classroom (79%, n=15) while less reported not teaching self-care in the classroom (21%, n=4).

10. Quantitative Findings
The chart below is comprised of the 15 respondents that said they teach self-care in the classroom. If instructors responded that they taught self-care in the classroom, they typically felt that their students absorbed what they were taught (40%, n=6) or the instructors felt neutral about how well their students absorbed the self-care content (53%, n=8). Otherwise one respondent reportedly disagreed with the feeling that their students absorbed self-care teachings (33%, n=1). No respondents felt strongly on either end as to whether their students absorb their self-care teachings (0%, n=0). Responses were then coded, with five being “strongly agree” and one being “strongly disagree.” With this coding, the mean (average) was 3.3. The median (middle-most number), along with the mode (number that occurs the most) were both 3.0.

11. Quantitative Findings
The chart below summarizes compilation of results from the five Likert scale questions assessing how effectively each respondent felt they met their needs in each aspect of self-care. These responses were coded, with a score of five being “extremely effectively” and one being “not at all effectively.” Average scores were highest for emotional and professional self-care (avg. = 3.8). Average scores were lowest for physical and spiritual self-care (avg. = 3.3). Psychological self-care scored in the middle (avg. = 3.6).

12. Quantitative Findings
The chart below summarizes results from a “check all that apply” question assessing the types of self-care respondents teach in the classroom. Percentages were calculated with data from the 15 respondents who said that they teach self-care in the classroom (n=15). Percentages were highest for psychological and emotional aspects (93%, n=14). Percentages were lowest for spiritual self-care (60%, n=9). In the middle were percentages for professional (73%, n=11) and physical (80%, n=12) aspects.

13. This study revealed that social work educators rated themselves rather high in terms of their own self-care practices. Respondents in this study felt that they did an adequate job of providing means for their own self-care, especially in terms of professional and emotional self-care. However, this high esteem did not exactly line up with the aspects of self-care instructors teach in the classroom. While emotional and professional aspects were the highest average scores for self-care aspects practiced by instructors (avg. = 3.8), emotional and psychological self-care were the highest scores for self-care aspects taught (93%, n=14). Physical self-care was another aspect taught at a rather high rate (80%, n=12) yet practiced the least among respondents (avg. = 3.3). Spiritual self-care was an aspect found to be practiced the least as well among respondents (avg. = 3.3) which lined up well with it being the aspect taught the least (60%, n=9). Professional self-care was among the highest scored among respondents who said they practiced it (avg. = 3.8), yet it was almost the lowest score among respondents who taught it (73%, n=11).

14. Respondents in this study reported higher rates of teaching self-care in the classroom (79%, n=15). While this high rate of teaching self-care is encouraging, there is uncertainty among respondents about whether their students are absorbing self-care teachings. Many respondents who reported teaching self-care said they agreed to the feeling that their students absorbed their self-care teachings (40%, n=6); whereas 53% (n=8) were neutral and 6% (n=1) disagreed. Because of these two responses being disjointed when compared and social work educators not seeing their students exhibiting their self-care habits, there seems to be a need for more self-care encouragement, teaching, and/or reassurance among social work students.

15. recommendations
Creation of a self-care committee within GASSW (option of fully faculty v. partially student-owned committee, monthly or quarterly meetings). This committee would plan and possibly facilitate self-care trainings, "lunch & learns," activities, etc. to encourage self-care among GASSW faculty, staff, and students.
Encourage community partnerships with places that offer therapy and other services sometimes needed for self-care.
Initiate self-care curriculum offerings through GASSW.
Initiate self-care scholarships for students who could otherwise not afford to tend to certain aspects of their self-care (therapy, mindfulness/self-care classes or training's).
Staff trainings on self-care
Continued or more frequent informal "after-work" gatherings, events, activities, etc. for GASSW faculty to encourage informal support.
Faculty trainings on how to teach self-care in the classroom.
Engage faculty and students in GASSW sponsored self-care workshops, possibly offering CEU credits.

16. Discussion/conclusions
Unique Study
Sample is relevant yet limited
Small sample size (n=19)
Availability of relevant participants limited (27 surveys sent out)
Increase sample size, expand to other institutions, survey students
More research and follow up needed on this topic!

18. Questions??