Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarylou Hoover Modified over 6 years ago
1
HW 7b: HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop May 2009 Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross – Prediction of Safety Performance for Intersections Session #7 – Exercise III – US 52 in Iowa (west of DuBuque and the Mississippi River) – Prediction of Safety Peformance for Intersections and Comparison to Substantive Safety Performance Session 7 – Exercise III - Intersections
2
Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross
Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop May 2009 Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Learning Outcomes: Select Intersection Crashes out of Total Crashes Apply SPF Base Model equations for prediction of crash frequency performance Compare predicted crash frequency to Substantive Safety performance Learning Objectives for Session #9 – Exercise III – Prediction of safety performance for Intersections on US 52 Session 7 – Exercise III - Intersections
3
Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross
Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop May 2009 Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Session 7 – Exercise III - Intersections
4
Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross
Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop May 2009 Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Session 7 – Exercise III - Intersections
5
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Exercise III: US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross – Segments/Grade/Curves August 2010 LOCATION NUMBER On Roadway Segments 63 Within Intersection 16 Intersection Related 1 On-Grades 3 On Curves 39 Total 122 Crashes by location Session 2 – Exercise I
6
Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross
Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop May 2009 Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Stop-Controlled Intersections on US 52: (AADTmaj = 2,500) Station Location Type Side Road ADT Predicted Crashes Skew Crashes x CMF 107 East of D 3-leg 450 15 deg 126 West of D 250 5 deg 262 East of F 70 deg 559 F 4-leg 300 0 deg TOTAL ? Complete the table: Predicted crashes of the four stop-controlled intersections and their AMF for skew. Sum the results to obtain the total number of predicted crashes for the four intersections. Session 7 – Exercise III - Intersections
7
Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross
Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop May 2009 Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Compute the predicted crashes for the four (4) intersections on US 52 Compare the Actual Crash Frequency to the Predicted Crash Frequency per year for the Intersections Discussion Pause at this slide; continue on when participants have worked on the exercise. Use Worksheet Exercise III Session 7 – Exercise III - Intersections
8
Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross
Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop May 2009 Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross From the US 52 corridor crash information, perform the following: Compare the actual crash frequency per year with the Predicted Crash Frequency performance for the Intersections Actual Crash Frequency = __ crashes / __ years = ___ crashes / year Predicted Intersection Crash Freuency = ____ crashes/year Session 7 – Exercise III - Intersections
9
Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross
Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop May 2009 Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Learning Outcomes: Selected Intersection Crashes out of Total Crashes Applied SPF Base Model equations for prediction of crash frequency performance Compared predicted crash frequency to Substantive Safety performance Learning Objectives for Session #9 – Exercise III – Prediction of safety performance for Intersections on US 52 Session 7 – Exercise III - Intersections
10
Questions and Discussion
HSM Applications to Two-Lane Rural Highways Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop May 2009 Questions and Discussion Session 7 – Exercise III - Intersections
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.