Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Searches for Non-SM Higgs at the Tevatron

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Searches for Non-SM Higgs at the Tevatron"— Presentation transcript:

1 Searches for Non-SM Higgs at the Tevatron
Thomas Wright University of Michigan on behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations This talk: neutral MSSM Higgs searches More exotic Higgs to follow (M. Mulhearn) XLIIIth Rencontres de Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions March 8-15, 2008

2 Higgs in the MSSM In the standard model, one complex doublet = four scalar fields Three turn into W/Z mass  one physical scalar Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) requires two doublets One couples only to up-type fermions, the other only to down-type Ratio of VEV’s - “tanb” Eight scalar fields – three for W/Z mass = five physical scalars Three neutral (h, H, A), two charged (H±) Properties of the Higgs sector largely determined by two parameters: mA : mass of pseudoscalar tanb : ratio of VEV’s Higher-order effects introduce other SUSY parameters (benchmark scenarios, see Carena et al., hep-ph/ ) Typically, mh < mA < mH , and mH± ~ mA For tanb near 1, h is SM-like and light – SM Higgs limits apply Larger tanb and light mA shows more interesting behavior

3 Higgs at High tanb b 0 b 0 Processes involving bottom quarks (down-type) can be enhanced (goes like tan2b) Boost from femtobarns to picobarns Could be observable at Tevatron! f0 = h/H/A via top loop H = SM Higgs here, H = A or h/H

4 Higgs at High tanb Neutral sector simplifies at high tanb
A and h/H become degenerate Other scalar SM-like, low cross section Only need to search for a single mass peak (f) For the A and its twin h/H, at high tanb decays into bb (90%) and tt (10%) dominate So, for example, won’t see enhancement in HWW* channel CDF and DØ are searching in both of these decay modes

5 The    Channel th ID t cone
Unique final state – can look for inclusive f production Main backgrounds: Z  tt, W+jets, dibosons One tau decays leptonically: e/m (CDF) or m (DØ) (plus n’s) pT > 10 GeV/c (CDF), 15 GeV/c (DØ) Other tau hadronic (both) (and nt) One or three tracks (Sqtrk = ±1), opposite to lepton CDF : isolation 30°, shrinking t cone (10°  3°) DØ : three types (p±, p±p0, 3-prong), NN score No electron veto (allows em) pT > 15 GeV/c (1-prong), 20 GeV/c (3-prong) Also tt  em (CDF), pT > 10, 6 GeV/c Reject non-tt background Lepton and missing energy inconsistent with W HT cut (CDF) or kinematic NN (DØ) th ID t cone isolation Multiple neutrinos  can’t reconstruct tt mass very well

6 CDF tt Results Moriond 2007, CDF 1 fb-1
mvis (GeV/c2) Last year at this time, CDF had a >2s excess around 160 GeV/c2 (<2s over all mf) Updated Fall 2007 with an additional 0.8 fb-1 of data No excess in e/m + thad channel after update mvis (GeV/c2)

7 CDF tt Results No apparent excess in em channel either
Set s x BR limits mvis (GeV/c2) mvis (GeV/c2)

8 DØ tt Results Visible mass (like CDF)
Just one input to search NN, along with lepton, tau kinematics Do not see any excess (as was the case last winter) Set s x BR limits

9 MSSM Interpretation DØ btt 340 pb-1
Interpret s x BR limits as limits on tanb vs mA in MSSM benchmark scenarios More data and analysis improvements on the way Project missing momentum onto t axes for boosted Higgs (improve mtt) Split into b-tagged and untagged samples (already demonstrated by DØ) Updated results from DØ in tt and btt channels coming soon!

10 too much background The fbb Channel 0 b b 0
Dawson, Jackson, Reina, Wackeroth hep-ph/ b quark pT >20 GeV/c, |h|<2 b 0 too much background b 0 with fbb, 3b total Inclusive H  bb is too hard due to QCD background Require one additional bottom quark jet besides the two from Higgs decay “3b” channel best compromise between signal and background rates

11 B-Jet Identification CDF CDF : displaced vertices with Lxy/s cut
Vertex mass separation DØ : combine vertex properties and displaced track info with NN Tag to h beyond 2

12 DØ 3b Channel Result with 0.9 fb-1 (2006), update coming soon!
Search uses invariant mass of the two leading jets m01 in triple-tagged events Derive background shape from double-tagged sample Correct for kinematic bias of third jet tag Normalize background to data in sideband region, look inside the signal window No excess observed, set limits on s x BR mH = 120

13 CDF 3b Channel New result for Moriond QCD 2008, using 1.9 fb-1
Search in mass of two lead jets m12 Backgrounds are events with two true b-tags, and a b/c/fake tag Characteristic m12 spectra for each Start from bb+jet sample (corrected double-tags), weight events by flavor hypothesis Correct bbb and bcb shapes for double/triple-tag selection bias Largest systematic error Fit the observed m12 spectrum with the backgrounds and a Higgs shape

14 CDF 3b Channel Improve prediction of total background m12 using tag properties Invariant mass of tracks in each vertex mj m1+m2 : bbb+bbx / bcb+bqb m3 : bbx / bbb+bcb+bqb Unstack into 1D variable “xtags” for plotting/fitting Fits are 2D – m12 vs xtags Four backgrounds Higgs signal template

15 CDF 3b Results No significant excess observed Set limits on s x BR
Background systematics limiting improvement at low mH Focus of the next round

16 MSSM Interpretation Interpret in MSSM scenarios
Include effect of Higgs width (~20% for tanb = 100) Lose sensitivity (lower S/B) Lowers event yield Best limits obtained in scenarios with m < 0 (loop enhancements)

17 Summary CDF and DØ are looking hard for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons
Lots of progress but no discovery as of yet Techniques are well-advanced but still room for improvement Taus: split samples to improve mtt and S/B with b-tagging 3b: background shape systematics (CDF) DØ updates on all three channels (tt, btt, 3b) coming soon Combination of experiments/channels is planned Results today use 1-2 fb-1, expect 5-6 by 2009 (7 by 2010?) Could probe down to tanb in the 20’s with full Run II samples Or, with the right mA and tanb, make a discovery!

18 Backup Material

19 Charged Higgs CDF : use dilepton, l+jets (single and double-tagged), and lepton+tau s’s Consider H+  tn, cs, t*b, W+bb Map out allowed and excluded regions in mH+ vs tanb using CPsuperH and CDF simulation to predict effects on top s’s Search in top decays t  H+b DØ : ration of cross sections l+jets/dilepton BR(t  H+b) < 95% CL (for H+  cs)

20 CDF tt Projections


Download ppt "Searches for Non-SM Higgs at the Tevatron"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google