Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAmelia Marshall Modified over 6 years ago
1
Ceri Nursaw www.nursawassociates.com
What did we learn? Ceri Nursaw
2
Are they all the same? Large proportion of social housing
White working class Access to employment Low participation in higher education
3
How different places can be …
Qualification level School type and quality Pupil premium gaps Rural, urban, wealthy and poor Community
4
Paulsgrove and Coxford
University cities Urban communities Similar gap in participation Good economic activity rates Level 1 and 2 qualifications
5
Paulsgrove and Coxford
Drop off during post-16 study School requires improving Closing the pupil premium gap Majority of LSOAs with less than 30% HE Coxford Good schools Large pupil premium gaps Boys significant underachievement One area less than 4% attend HE
6
What was I able to see? Families and their circumstances within communities Educational context Economic context Identify areas of work
7
Areas of work Families Few graduate parents
Low proportion of parents with Level 4 or above Significant numbers with no qualifications Social housing comprises a third
8
Areas of work Boys Boys are not performing well at secondary school
Boys perform significantly worse than girls at GCSE following comparable Key Stage 2 results
9
Areas of work Transition and pathways
A significant proportion of students move into post-16 study, but this drops significantly at Year 13 Only 58% of students progress onto further education.
10
Areas of work Pupil premium gaps
The schools are good. There are significant performance gaps between those who do and do not receive pupil premium.
11
Using research to inform
Pupil premium students do best when they are a large or small proportion (Ofsted, 2013) Poor white men underachieve (HEPI, 2016) Boys spend 1 hr a week less on homework (OECD 2015) Parental involvement in school and their aspirations is the most important factor in low educational achievement (Goodman and Gregg, 2010) Belief is that leaving school at 16 does not limit career opportunities (Bowes et al, 2015).
12
Using research for practice
Parental engagement with school Individualised approaches Targeted and sustained interventions Pupil premium funding targeted directly at the pupil Male role models
13
Benefits to practitioners
Builds on solid foundations Know the baseline Target resources and activity Know the scale of the challenge What interventions are needed
14
Is a change required? Closer to communities
Making families an integral part Financial support considered in a different way Informed practice
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.