Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Open vs Closed Loop Frequency Response

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Open vs Closed Loop Frequency Response"— Presentation transcript:

1 Open vs Closed Loop Frequency Response
And Frequency Domain Specifications C(s) G(s) Goal: 1) Define typical “good” freq resp shape for closed-loop 2) Relate closed-loop freq response shape to step response shape 3) Relate closed-loop freq shape to open-loop freq resp shape 4) Design C(s) to make C(s)G(s) into “good” shape.

2 Mr and BW are widely used
Closed-loop phase resp. rarely used

3 BW Prototype 2nd order system closed-loop frequency response
No resonance for z <= 0.7 Mr=0.3dB for z=0.6 Mr=1.2dB for z=0.5 Mr=2.6dB for z=0.4 For small zeta, resonance freq is about wn BW ranges from 0.5 wn to 1.5 wn For good z range, BW is 0.8~1.25 wn So take BW ≈ wn z=0.1 0.2 0.3 -3dB BW w/wn 0.63 1.58 0.79 1.26

4 Closed-loop BW to wn ratio
BW≈wn z

5 Prototype 2nd order system closed-loop frequency response
z=0.1 When z <=0.5  visible resonance peak near w=wn When z >=0.6 no visible resonance peak 0.2 0.3 Since we design for z >=0.5, Mr and wr are of less value No resonance for z <= 0.7 Mr<0.5 dB for z=0.6 Mr=1.2 dB for z=0.5 Mr=2.6 dB for z=0.4 w=wn w/wn

6 Prototype 2nd order system closed-loop frequency response
Mr vs z

7 Mr in dB

8 Percentage Overshoot in closed-loop step response
z > 0.5 is good z

9 Mr < 15% is good, >40% dB not tolerable
Percentage Overshoot in closed-loop step response Mr < 15% is good, >40% dB not tolerable Mr

10 Mr < 1 dB is good, >3 dB not tolerable
Percentage Overshoot in closed-loop step response Mr < 1 dB is good, >3 dB not tolerable Mr in dB

11 0.2 z=0.1 0.3 0.4 wgc In the range of good zeta, wgc is about 0.7 times wn w/wn

12 Open-loop wgc to wn ratio
wgc≈0.7wn z

13 In the range of good zeta,
PM is about 100*z z=0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 w/wn

14 Phase Margin PM = 100z z

15 PM+Mp =70 line Percentage Overshoot in closed-loop step response Phase Margin in degrees

16 Important relationships
Closed-loop BW are very close to wn Open-loop gain cross over wgc ≈ (0.65~0.8)* wn, When z <= 0.6, wr and wn are close When z >= 0.7, no resonance z determines phase margin and Mp: z PM deg ≈100z Mp % PM+Mp ≈70

17 Desired Bode plot shape
High low freq gain for steady state tracking Low high freq gain for noise attenuation Sufficient PM near wgc for stability wgc w 0dB w -90 -180

18 Controller design with Bode
C(s) Gp(s) From specs: => desired Bode shape of Gol(s) Make Bode plot of Gp(s) Add C(s) to change Bode shape Get closed loop system Run step response, or sinusoidal response

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Proportional controller design
Obtain open loop Bode plot Convert design specs into Bode plot req. Select KP based on requirements: For improving ess: KP = Kp,v,a,des / Kp,v,a,act For fixing Mp: select wgcd to be the freq at which PM is sufficient, and KP = 1/|G(jwgcd)| For fixing speed: from td, tr, tp, or ts requirement, find out wn, let wgcd = wn and choose KP as above

27 clear all; n=[0 0 40]; d=[1 2 0]; figure(1); clf; margin(n,d); %proportional control design: figure(1); hold on; grid; V=axis; Mp = 10; %overshoot in percentage PMd = 70-Mp + 3; semilogx(V(1:2), [PMd-180 PMd-180],':r'); %get desired w_gc x=ginput(1); w_gcd = x(1); KP = 1/abs(evalfr(tf(n,d),j*w_gcd)); figure(2); margin(KP*n,d); figure(3); mystep(KP*n, d+KP*n);

28

29

30

31

32 Lead Controller Design

33 Goal: select z and p so that max phase lead is at desired wgc
plead zlead 20log(Kzlead/plead) Goal: select z and p so that max phase lead is at desired wgc and max phase lead = PM defficiency!

34

35 Lead Design From specs => PMd and wgcd From plant, draw Bode plot
Find PMhave = angle(G(jwgcd) DPM = PMd - PMhave + a few degrees Choose a=plead/zlead so that fmax = DPM and it happens at wgcd

36 Lead design example Plant transfer function is given by:
n=[50000]; d=[ ]; Desired design specifications are: Step response overshoot <= 16% Closed-loop system BW>=20;

37 n=[50000]; d=[ ]; G=tf(n,d); figure(1); margin(G); Mp_d = 16/100; zeta_d =0.5; % or calculate from Mp_d PMd = 100*zeta_d ; BW_d=20; w_gcd = BW_d*0.7; Gwgc=evalfr(G, j*w_gcd); PM = pi+angle(Gwgc); phimax= PMd*pi/180-PM; alpha=(1+sin(phimax))/(1-sin(phimax)); zlead= w_gcd/sqrt(alpha); plead=w_gcd*sqrt(alpha); K=sqrt(alpha)/abs(Gwgc); ngc = conv(n, K*[1 zlead]); dgc = conv(d, [1 plead]); figure(1); hold on; margin(ngc,dgc); hold off; [ncl,dcl]=feedback(ngc,dgc,1,1); figure(2); step(ncl,dcl);

38 After design Before design

39 Closed-loop Bode plot by:
margin(ncl*1.414,dcl); Magnitude plot shifted up 3dB So, gc is BW

40

41 n=[50]; d=[1/5 1 0]; figure(1); clf; margin(n,d); grid; hold on; Mp = 20/100; zeta = sqrt((log(Mp))^2/(pi^2+(log(Mp))^2)); PMd = zeta * ; ess2ramp= 1/200; Kvd=1/ess2ramp; Kva = n(end)/d(end-1); Kzp = Kvd/Kva; figure(2); margin(Kzp*n,d); grid; [GM,PM,wpc,wgc]=margin(Kzp*n,d); w_gcd=wgc; phimax = (PMd-PM)*pi/180; alpha=(1+sin(phimax))/(1-sin(phimax)); z=w_gcd/sqrt(alpha); p=w_gcd*sqrt(alpha); ngc = conv(n, alpha*Kzp*[1 z]); dgc = conv(d, [1 p]); figure(3); margin(tf(ngc,dgc)); grid; [ncl,dcl]=feedback(ngc,dgc,1,1); figure(4); step(ncl,dcl); grid; figure(5); margin(ncl*1.414,dcl); grid;

42

43

44

45

46

47

48 n=[50]; d=[1/5 1 0]; figure(1); clf; margin(n,d); grid; hold on; Mp = 20/100; zeta = sqrt((log(Mp))^2/(pi^2+(log(Mp))^2)); PMd = zeta * ; ess2ramp= 1/200; Kvd=1/ess2ramp; Kva = n(end)/d(end-1); Kzp = Kvd/Kva; figure(2); margin(Kzp*n,d); grid; [GM,PM,wpc,wgc]=margin(Kzp*n,d); w_gcd=wgc; phimax = (PMd-PM)*pi/180; alpha=(1+sin(phimax))/(1-sin(phimax)); z=w_gcd/alpha^.25; %sqrt(alpha); p=w_gcd*alpha^.75; %sqrt(alpha); ngc = conv(n, alpha*Kzp*[1 z]); dgc = conv(d, [1 p]); figure(3); margin(tf(ngc,dgc)); grid; [ncl,dcl]=feedback(ngc,dgc,1,1); figure(4); step(ncl,dcl); grid; figure(5); margin(ncl*1.414,dcl); grid;

49

50

51

52

53

54


Download ppt "Open vs Closed Loop Frequency Response"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google