Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Sediment Sample Digestion Method
Comparative Study Prepared by Ph.D Kwon Seok .Park Marine Police R&D Center
2
Content Study Background And Proficiency Test (push forward content)
2. Comparative Digestion Method 3. Survey Result 4. Conclusion
3
I. Study Background And Objective
International Analysis Efficiency Test and Analysis Ability Appraise by ISO Certification Application Found some problems in digestion Study Objective Differences between Heating Digestion and Microwave Digestion Analysis Result Appraise by Statistical Method
4
2. Progress ’ International Approval Organization Efficiency Test 8. 1 ~ 22 Heavy Metal for Analysis Sample Statistical Interpretation for Analysis Result & Report Analysis Result from APLAC Supervision : (APLAC) Subject : (HKAS) Participate Scale : 42 Countries 109 Institutes
5
Process Digestion Filtering Final Sample Analysis (ICP/MS)
6
ICP/MS Measurement
7
Statistical Interpretation Result by Analysis Result
Cadmium (Cd) : 0.288± mg/kg (Z-Score 0.15) Certified Value : 0.263±0.004mg/kg Lead (Pb) : 1.561± mg/kg (Z-Score 0.24) Certified Value : 1.463±0.025mg/kg 7
8
Z Score 0 Range Won The Best Top Grade
Result Z Score 0 Range Won The Best Top Grade Participate Scale : 42Countries 109Institute 8
9
Comparative Digestion System
10
Comparative Analysis System
11
The Marine Police R&D Center’s Digestion Comparative Method
Heating vs Microwave Heating Vessel vs Teflon Beaker
12
3. Study Method Sample for analysis Analyze Items
Sample : Unknown Powder Sample 5 g (International Approval Organization Menufacture) Reference : RM Class Powder Sample 8 g (Korea Standard Science Researcher Menufacture) Analyze Items Cd, Pb (2ea items) Instrumental Analysis Systems Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectromerty (ICP/MS) Model : Varian 830
13
Digestion Method The Marine Pollution Official Test Method for Sediment Digestion System : Hot Plate, Microwave Heating Microwave
14
Digestion Process 24 hr Stay Microwave digestion Air Cooling Massup
- Conc. HNO3 10 ml 加 - 1 % HNO3 15 ml 加 - Conc. HNO3 5 ml 加 - Conc. HClO4 2.5 ml 加 Standard Stock Solution (10 ppm) Working Standard Solution (1.0 ppm) Calibration (5, 10, 20, 50 ppb) Powder Sampl 0.2 g을 Telfon Cell에 取 24 hr Stay Microwave digestion Air Cooling Massup Filtering - 220, 5hr (Slowly heating up) Put Powder Sample 0.2g into Vessel Heating Room temperature Cooling Mass-up ICP/MS Measurement psi, 30min
15
Digestion Process (Ex.Teflon Beaker)
Put Sample 0.5 g into teflon beaker - Conc. HNO3 5 ml 加 - HClO4 2.5 ml 加 - HF 2.5 ml 加 Heating Standard Stock Solution (10 ppm) - 130 (Slowly heating up) ) Reheating when undigested Working Standard Solution (1.0 ppm) - Conc. HNO3 10 ml 加 - HClO4 10 ml 加 - HF 2.5 ml 加 Room temperature Cooling Calibration (5, 10, 20, 50 ppb) Mass-up Filtering ICP/MS Measurement
16
4. Result Accuracy Heating (Vessel) vs Microwave
17
The concentration changes according to temperature
Heating (Vessel)
18
Recovery Rate Digestion Vessel : Vessel (Closed Type) and Teflon Beaker (Open Type) Digestion Method : Heating
19
Teflon Beaker (Open type)
Digestion Vessel Vessel (Closed type) Teflon Beaker (Open type)
20
Digestion Vessel
21
5. Conclusion Comparative Digestion Methods for Cd, Pb Items
Heating Method Accuracy is higher than Microwave Closed Digestion Vessel’s Recovery Rate is higher than other vessels The similar concentration is maintained over 180 ℃ Leaving the sample for natural digestion impacts on analysis result differences
22
Any Questions ?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.