Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: is there a difference?  L.Richard Sprouse,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: is there a difference?  L.Richard Sprouse,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: is there a difference?  L.Richard Sprouse, MD, George H Meier, MD, Christopher J LeSar, MD, Richard J DeMasi, MD, Jaideep Sood, MS,, F.Noel Parent, MD, Michael J Marcinzyck, MD, Robert G Gayle, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery  Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003) DOI: /S (03)

2 Fig 1 Measurement of maximal aneurysm diameter with CTmax (black line) (56.9 mm) compared with USmax (white line) (47.4 mm). CTmax significantly greater than USmax (P < .001). Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (03) )

3 Fig 2 Correlation between CTmax and USmax.
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (03) )

4 Fig 3 Limits of agreement (broken lines) between CTmax and USmax (− mm) compared with clinically acceptable limits of agreement (highlighted area) between CTmax and USmax (− mm). Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (03) )

5 Fig 4 Limits of agreement (broken lines) between CTmin and USmax (− mm) compared with clinically acceptable limits of agreement (highlighted area) between CTmin and USmax (− mm). Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (03) )


Download ppt "Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: is there a difference?  L.Richard Sprouse,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google