Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer"— Presentation transcript:

1 CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer
Expert Perspectives on New Data Faculty Javier Cortes, MD, PhD Head Breast Cancer Program Oncology Department Ramon y Cajal University Hospital Madrid, Spain Fabrice André, MD, PhD Professor Chairman, Inserm Unit U981 Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif, France CKD = cyclin-dependent kinase

2 Program Overview In this program, we will discuss
The evolution of the treatment of HR+, HER2- MBC The role of CDK 4/6 inhibitors, including recently presented data on their efficacy, safety, and use in clinical practice HER2- = HER2-negative HR+ = hormone receptor-positive MBC = metastatic breast cancer

3 CDK 4/6 Inhibitors: Consistency of Response
Palbociclib With LET for HR+, HER2- ABC as initial ET in postmenopausal women PFS = 10.2 months (PBO + LET) vs 20.2 months (PAL + LET); HR (95% CI): (0.319, 0.748); P = .0004 PALOMA-1[a] With FUL for HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC with PD following ET PFS = 9.2 months (PAL + FUL) vs 3.8 months (PBO + FUL); HR (95% CI): 0.42 (0.32, 0.56); P < .001 PALOMA-3[b] HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC with AI as initial ET in postmenopausal women PFS = 24.8 months (PAL) vs 14.5 months (PBO); HR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.46, 0.72); P < .001 PALOMA-2[c] HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC in combination with an AI as initial ET or in combination with FUL following prior ET[b,c] Ribociclib With an AI as initial ET for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC PFS = 14.7 months (RIB) vs NR (PBO); HR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.43, 0.72); P < 3.29 × 10−6 MONALEESA-2[d] With an AI as initial ET for pre- or perimenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC PFS: 23.8 months (RIB) vs 13.0 months(PBO); HR (95% CI): (0.44, 0.69); P < .0001 MONALEESA-7[e] With FUL for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC as initial ET or following PD on ET Estimated median PFS = months (RIB) vs 12.8 months (PBO); HR (95% CI): 0.593; (0.480, 0.732); P < .0001 MONALEESA-3[f] With an AI as initial ET for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC[d] Abemaciclib With FUL in HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC with PD following ET PFS = 16.4 months (ABE) vs 9.3 months (PBO); HR (95% CI): (0.449, 0.681) P < .001 MONARCH-2[g] As monotherapy for HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC with PD following ET and prior CT PFS = 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.2, 7.5) MONARCH-1[h] With an AI as initial ET for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC PFS = NR (ABE) vs 14.7 months (PBO); HR (95% CI): (0.409, 0.723); P = MONARCH-3[i] With an AI or FUL as initial ET or in women who have received prior ET[g,i] ABC = advanced breast cancer ABE = abemaciclib AI = aromatase inhibitor CI = confidence interval CT = chemotherapy ET = endocrine-based therapy FUL = fulvestrant HR = hazard ratio LET = letrozole NR = not reached PAL = palbociclib PBO = placebo PD = progression of disease PFS = progression-free survival a. Finn RS, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25-35; b. Turner NC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373: ; c. Finn RS, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375: ; d. Hortobagyi GN, et al. Ann Oncol. 2018;29: ; e. Tripathy D, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19: ; f. Slamon DJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36: ; g. Sledge GW Jr, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35: ; h. Dickler MN, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23: ; i. Goetz MP, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:

4 PALOMA-3: OS (ITT) ITT = intention to treat OS = overall survival N = 521 patients with hormone-receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had progression or relapse during previous endocrine therapy. Absolute improvement in median OS in the palbociclib arm vs the placebo arm was 6.9 months. From N Engl J Med, Nicholas C. Turner, M.D, et al., Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer, Copyright © 2018 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission from Massachusetts Medical Society.

5 PALOMA-3: OS by Sensitivity to Prior ET
Patients With Sensitivity to Previous ET Patients Without Sensitivity to Previous ET From N Engl J Med, Nicholas C. Turner, M.D, et al., Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer, Copyright © 2018 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission from Massachusetts Medical Society.

6 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With or Without OR: Results From PALOMA-2
DOR = duration of response OR = objective response In patients who achieved an OR, median DOR was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole (27.7 months; 95% CI: 24.7, 36.1) vs placebo plus letrozole (20.9 months; 95% CI: 16.5, 27.6). Rugo HS, et al ESMO Congress. Poster 332P.

7 SOLAR-1: Alpelisib + Fulvestrant for HR+, HER2- ABC
Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the safety/efficacy of alpelisib in addition to fluvestrant in men and postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC, who received prior treatment with an AI, with or without a CDK 4/6 inhibitor[a] Approximately 40% of patients with HR+ ABC have PIK3CA mutations[b,c] The PI3K pathway is the most commonly mutated pathway associated with tumor progression in HR+ ABC a. André F, et al ESMO Congress. Abstract LBA3; b. Sabine VS, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32: ; c. Lee JJ, et al. Cancer Biol Med. 2015;12:

8 SOLAR-1: Median PFS in Patients With PIK3CA Mutations
HR (95% CI): 0.65 (0.50, 0.85) P = PFS determined by local assessment. There was no advantage to alpelisib on median PFS in patients without a PIK3CA mutation. André F, et al ESMO Congress. Abstract LBA3.

9 Implications of SOLAR-1 Trial Results
In the future, may consider different treatment options based on genomic testing results, as well as estrogen- receptor positivity Genomic testing is used in other fields of cancer medicine It is expected that other drugs will show efficacy according to genomic segments in the future

10 Risk of VTE in Patients Receiving CDK 4/6 Inhibitors: Updated Meta-Analysis
Homogeneity existed between RCTs Patients receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitors experienced an increase in VTE risk vs control group Pooled RR: 3.56 (95% CI: 1.57, 8.06; P = .002) RCT = randomized clinical trials RR = risk ratio VTE = venous thromboembolism 6 studies (PALOMA-1, PALOMA-2, PALOMA-3, MONARCH-2, MONARCH-3, MONALEESA-2) with a total of 3159 eligible patients. Thein KZ, et al ESMO Congress. Poster 1691P.

11 CDK 4/6 Inhibitors and the Risk for VTE: Implications of Meta-Analysis
Although the risk of VTE was higher in patients who received a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, overall incidence was low Evaluate other factors, which may contribute to increased VTE risk in patients receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitors

12 Importance of Real-World Data in Oncology
Support active pharmacovigilance Develop external control arms Enable evidence generation based on pragmatic clinical trials Support randomized study designs Expand clinical research to point of care May help increase access to experimental therapies Increase patient participation in clinical trials Importance of Real-World Data in Oncology Khozin S, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109.

13 Real-World Use of Palbociclib in Patients With HR+, HER2- ABC: Results From POLARIS
Disease-Free Interval, Patients Who Received Palbociclib as First-Line ABC Therapy A heterogeneous population received palbociclib Older, premenopausal, black, Latino/Hispanic, and male patients not commonly represented in clinical trials 69.9% of patients received palbociclib combination as first-line ABC therapy 56.6% received palbociclib in combination with letrozole or anastrozole, 39.5% with fulvestrant, and 3.9% with exemestane This interim analysis includes the first 402 patients (target enrollment 1500 patients) with completed baseline case report forms from 86 sites in the United States (data cutoff, August 13, 2018). Blum JL, et al ESMO Congress. Poster 344P.

14 Real-World Treatment With Palbociclib Therapy in Germany: Results From IRIS
Reasons for Discontinuation Overall PAL + AI PAL + FUL Total, n 257 194 63 PD following initial control/response, n (%) 5 (13.2) 3 (10.0) 2 (25.0) PD without initial control/response, n (%) 3 (7.9) 2 (6.7) 1 (12.5) Pill burden/compliance, n (%) 1 (2.6) 1 (3.3) 0 (0) Side effects/toxicity, n (%) 13 (34.2) 12 (40.0) Patient request, n (%) 7 (18.4) 5 (16.7) Other, n (%) 7 (23.3) EMA = European Medicines Agency Evaluation of treatment patterns in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC/MBC in Germany who received palbociclib combinations (palbociclib + an AI or palbociclib + fulvestrant) in line with EMA labeled indications. Mitra D, et al ESMO Congress. Poster 338P.

15 Treatment Landscape of HR+, HER2- MBC
Evolving with recent positive advances In the past 3 years, CDK 4/6 inhibitors, a novel class of targeted therapy, have been approved for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC Palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib Fernandes MT, et al. Drugs Context. 2018;7:

16 Treatment Landscape of HR+, HER2- MBC (cont)
Demonstrated benefit of CDK 4/6 inhibitors All agents exhibit PFS benefit vs standard of care Benefits also demonstrated in terms of OS CKD 4/6 inhibitors for all patients? CDK 4/6 inhibitors are efficacious among different patient subgroups Further studies are needed to select patients who will receive the greatest benefit CDK 4/6 inhibitors generally have fewer AEs vs traditional chemotherapeutic options AE = adverse event Fernandes MT, et al. Drugs Context. 2018;7:

17 HR+, HER2- MBC Treatment: Challenges for the Future
Optimizing the role of biomarkers to select patient populations that would receive the greatest benefit from CDK 4/6 inhibitors While the use of biomarkers for patient selection may not be achievable in the short term, clinicians can work to determine which patients are not receiving adequate benefit from a CKD 4/6 inhibitor Consider dynamic biomarkers

18 HR+, HER2- MBC Treatment: Challenges for the Future (cont)
Determining the role of continued treatment with CDK 4/6 inhibitors after treatment progression Exploring mechanisms of resistance Majority of mechanisms of resistance are to ET vs CDK 4/6 inhibitors, specifically[a] a. Turner N. ASCO® Oral presentation 1001.

19 HR+, HER2- MBC Treatment: Challenges for the Future (cont)
Clarifying the role of CDK 4/6 inhibitors for patients with important visceral metastases, but not in visceral crisis Guidelines recommend ET for patients with HR+ disease, even in the presence of visceral disease, unless there is a visceral crisis[a] However, a group of patients with high disease burden, but not yet in visceral crisis exist There is a role for CKD 4/6 inhibition in this group of patients Exploring the role of CDK 4/6 inhibitors vs chemotherapy in patients with visceral crisis a. Cardoso F, et al. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:16-33.

20 Summary CDK 4/6 inhibitors are promising agents for the treatment of HR+, HER2- MBC Efficacy is similar between agents Different AE profiles between agents, but with better overall tolerability profile vs traditional chemotherapeutic agents Several unanswered questions remain regarding the use of CDK 4/6 inhibitors Optimal treatment sequence Ideal patient population

21 Abbreviations ABC = advanced breast cancer ABE = abemaciclib AE = adverse event AI = aromatase inhibitor CI = confidence interval CKD = cyclin-dependent kinase CT = chemotherapy DOR = duration of response EMA = European Medicines Agency ET = endocrine-based therapy FUL = fulvestrant HR+ = hormone receptor-positive HR = hazard ratio ITT = intention to treat LET = letrozole MBC = metastatic breast cancer NR = not reached OR = objective response OS = overall survival

22 Abbreviations (cont) PAL = palbociclib PBO = placebo PD = progression of disease PFS = progression-free survival RCT = randomized clinical trials RR = risk ratio VTE = venous thromboembolism


Download ppt "CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google