Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

J. L. Lemaire (Inst. des Sciences Moleculaires d’Orsay), M

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "J. L. Lemaire (Inst. des Sciences Moleculaires d’Orsay), M"— Presentation transcript:

1 High-resolution Spectroscopy of the A1Π(vˊ=0-10)–X1Σ+(vˊˊ=0) Bands in 13C18O
J.L. Lemaire (Inst. des Sciences Moleculaires d’Orsay), M. Eidelsberg (Obs. de Paris), A.N. Heays (Leiden), L. Gavilan (UMPC), S.R. Federman (U. of Toledo), G. Stark (Wellesley), J.R. Lyons (ASU), N. de Oliveira, and D. Joyeux (SOLEIL) This research was supported by grants from NASA and CNRS-PCMI program

2 Outline Background New Results from SOLEIL Concluding Remarks

3 Processes affecting mix of isotopologues
Background Processes affecting mix of isotopologues Isotope Charge Exchange – favors 13C16O It has lower zero-point energy 13C+ + 12C16O → 12C+ + 13C16O – ΔE (ΔE/k ≈ 35 K) Selective Isotopic Photodissociation – favors more abundant isotopic variant Dissociation occurs through line absorption at far UV wavelengths More abundant variant has lines that are more optically thick, shielding itself from further dissociation

4 Background Results on diffuse molecular clouds (Sheffer et al. 2008, ApJ, 687, 1075) Selective Isotope Photodissociation 13CO also self shielded Isotope Charge Exchange

5 Importance of self shielding (Sheffer et al. 2008)
Background Importance of self shielding (Sheffer et al. 2008)

6 Background Results depend on f-values for isotopologues (Sheffer et al. 2002, ApJ, 574, L171)

7 SOLEIL Experiments DESIRS beamline with a VUV FTS at SOLEIL Synchrotron

8 SOLEIL Experiments The FTS (de Oliveira et al. 2009, Rev. Sci. Instru., 80, ; de Oliveira et al. 2011, Nature Photonics, 5, 149) Resolving power as high as 750,000 (here we used 350,000) Based on wave front division instead of amplitude division Relies on modified bimirror configuration requiring only flat mirrors Path difference scanning through translation of one reflector

9 SOLEIL Experiments Need calibration band: use B – X (0,0)
This band is isolated For 12C16O, its band f-value is well characterized (with weighted uncertainty of 6%) For 13C18O, close-coupling model of interaction between B 1Σ+ and D′ 1Σ+ indicates f-value varies less than 1.7% among isotoplogues (Stark et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 67) Fit of 12C16O band (Eidelsberg et al. 2012, A&A, 543, 69)

10 Our previous related work using SOLEIL
SOLEIL Experiments Our previous related work using SOLEIL Gavilan et al. 2013, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 9644 – terms values for 13C16O Hakalla et al. 2016, RSC Advances, 6, – deperturbation analysis for 12C17O Federman et al. 1997, ApJ, 477, L61 – relative f-values for 12C16O Jolly et al. 1997, J. Phys. B, 30, 4315 – comparison of experimental and theoretical f-values for 12C16O Eidelsberg et al. 1999, A&A, 346, 705 – recommended f-values for 12C16O

11 SOLEIL Experiments Comparison of bands

12 SOLEIL Experiments A–X vˊ=3 band (red: perturbing band; blue unidentified lines)

13 SOLEIL Experiments Example of reduced term values (1/I and 2/II newly detected)

14 SOLEIL Experiments Graphical representation of perturbations

15 SOLEIL Experiments Detected 4 new perturbing bands – 11Σ+ and 21Π affecting vˊ=0 band; 31Π and 41Π affecting vˊ=3 and 8 bands, respectively Fraction of f-value – 11Σ+ (32.1%) and 21Π (12.5%) for vˊ=0; 31Π (6.4%) and 41Π (4.6%) for their respective bands Additional unidentified lines seen in spectra of vˊ=0,1,2,8,10 bands These lines contribute between 0.1 to 11.4% for their respective bands’ f-values Confirm many of the perturbations seen by Haridass et al. (1994, J. Mol. Spec., 167, 334) See additional, weaker perturbations associated with e3Σ- (vˊ=1), aˊ3Σ+ (vˊ=9,12), I1Σ- (vˊ=2), and D1Δ (vˊ=4)

16 Concluding Remarks Work in press – Lemaire et al. et al. (2016, J. Phys. B) Next steps: Complete deperturbation analysis of A–X bands in 13C17O Analyze perturbations in B–X series of bands Obtain f-values for A–X and triplet-singlet bands in 13C16O Obtain f-values for bands involving the B, C, and E states with greater precision (<5%) for photochemical models


Download ppt "J. L. Lemaire (Inst. des Sciences Moleculaires d’Orsay), M"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google