1. The effect of GOODCOLL versus POORCOLL on LVEF, LVEDV and scar at 4 months.
The effect of GOODCOLL versus POORCOLL on LVEF, LVEDV and scar at 4 months. LVEF, LVEDV and scar at 4- month follow-up in the total population, comparing GOODCOLL (well-developed collaterals to the CTO) and POORCOLL (poorly developed collaterals to the CTO) (first two upper panels) and the total amount of scar, amount of scar in the culprit vessel area and CTO vessel area in patients with GOODCOLL and POORCOLL (lower panel). CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; CTO, coronary chronic total occlusion; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (mL); LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction (%).
Ivo M van Dongen et al. Open Heart 2018;5:e000810
©2018 by British Cardiovascular Society