1. AP REVIEW
Footnote Section

2. Footnotes
It is likely that at least one of the reading passages on the AP exam will have a few questions about MLA formatting, citations, and/or footnotes. Make sure you know the order of information as well as what exactly the punctuation indicates.

3. Pages on which info appears
Title of book (note that it is underlined; it could also be italicized)
Author’s name
1 Frank Feather, Canada's Best Careers Guide 2000 (Toronto: Warwick, 2000)
Pages on which info appears
Year of Publication
Place of publication
Publisher
Book with an author

4. Page on which info appears
Title of book (note that it is underlined; it could also be italicized)
4 Microsoft PowerPoint Version 2002 Step by Step, (Redmond,  WA: Perspection, 2001) 235.
Publisher
Page on which info appears
Place of publication
Year of Publication
Book with NO author

5. Title of article (note that it is within quotation marks)
Author’s name
10 Tom Fennell, "From Misfit to Murderer," Maclean's  4 Nov. 2002:
Publication date
Publication (note that it is underlined; it could also be italicized)
Pages on which info appears
Article with an author

6. Internet article with an author
Author’s name (et al. means there are at least 3 more)
Title of article (note that it is within quotation marks)
Publication (note that it is underlined; it could also be italicized)
Publication date
19 James Henretta, et al., "Richard Allen and African-American Identity," America's History, Spring 1997, 11 Feb.2006 
<
Web address
Date of access
Internet article with an author

7. No definitional work is offered
No online sources were referenced
There is not redirection, plus we don’t see any aspect of the cited paper
Establishing credibility of sources isn’t a purpose here, nor is judging them

8. Sources aren’t judged
We have no indication about funding
Sources/material aren’t placed in competition with each other
No definitions are offered

9. Authors/speakers Title of piece Date of conference Place of conference
From the librarian: Since your example says "Proceedings of...", my best guess is that the proceedings of the conference were published and "Observations of Contrails..." is the title of a presentation.
Authors/speakers
Title of piece
Date of conference
Place of conference

10. It ISN”T just sci journals that were consulted; not sure what that “non-specialist” thing is???
One source is dated 1999, but there is no indication that that was the 1st one on the topic
We don’t know WHO led the way in this
research
That’s a generalization; we see the passage as
only 1 example of the author’s writing, so how
are we to know the style of his/her other
pieces?