Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1 MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal.

Published byRoel Bauwens Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1 MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1 MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal. bOne patient became pregnant during the trial and therefore did not receive treatment at weeks 8 and 10 (received 4 doses of study drug). MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal. bOne patient became pregnant during the trial and therefore did not receive treatment at weeks 8 and 10 (received 4 doses of study drug). Cris S. Constantinescu et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2015;2:e117 © 2015 American Academy of Neurology

Download ppt "Figure 1 MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal."

Similar presentations

Figure EDSS, FS scores, and Modified MSFC scores

Figure EDSS, FS scores, and Modified MSFC scores
Figure 2 ALSFRS-R changes (A) Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope after 6 months of treatment without (left)

Figure 2 ALSFRS-R changes (A) Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope after 6 months of treatment without (left)
Figure 2 Cumulative proportion of patients experiencing a seizure recurrence after randomization, comparing immediate vs deferred treatment Cumulative.

Figure 2 Cumulative proportion of patients experiencing a seizure recurrence after randomization, comparing immediate vs deferred treatment Cumulative.
Figure 2 Orbital MRI findings One-third of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–positive patients revealed extensive enhancement patterns that.

Figure 2 Orbital MRI findings One-third of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–positive patients revealed extensive enhancement patterns that.
Figure 2. Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit for all participants Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit.

Figure 2. Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit for all participants Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit.
Figure Brain MRI of the patient throughout the disease course(A) Brain MRI at the time of cerebral toxoplasmosis diagnosis (a) and after 1 month of toxoplasmosis.

Figure Brain MRI of the patient throughout the disease course(A) Brain MRI at the time of cerebral toxoplasmosis diagnosis (a) and after 1 month of toxoplasmosis.
Figure 1 Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during each round of Treg infusions Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during.

Figure 1 Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during each round of Treg infusions Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during.
Figure 1 Patient flow diagram

Figure 1 Patient flow diagram
Figure 3 Immune response to neoantigen: Geometric mean titers of antirabies antibody levels over timeAt days 31 and 38, all subjects achieved antibody.

Figure 3 Immune response to neoantigen: Geometric mean titers of antirabies antibody levels over timeAt days 31 and 38, all subjects achieved antibody.
Figure 5 Treatment with fingolimod raises the activation threshold of monocytes in MS Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 8 healthy donors, 7 patients.

Figure 5 Treatment with fingolimod raises the activation threshold of monocytes in MS Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 8 healthy donors, 7 patients.
Figure 3 JCV index changes in JCV+ patients

Figure 3 JCV index changes in JCV+ patients
Figure 1 Cerebral MRI during the disease course Cerebral MRI with multiple cerebral supratentorial lesions during the disease course: periventricular lesions.

Figure 1 Cerebral MRI during the disease course Cerebral MRI with multiple cerebral supratentorial lesions during the disease course: periventricular lesions.
Figure 2 Correlation between total IgG levels and anti-AQP4 IgG titer

Figure 2 Correlation between total IgG levels and anti-AQP4 IgG titer
Figure 1 8-Iso-PGF2α levels in CSF of patients with MS and controlsCSF 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) levels were estimated using an ELISA. (A)

Figure 1 8-Iso-PGF2α levels in CSF of patients with MS and controlsCSF 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) levels were estimated using an ELISA. (A)
Figure 2 Mean serum concentrations of BIIB033 vs time(A) Single ascending dose study and (B) multiple ascending dose study. Mean serum concentrations of.

Figure 2 Mean serum concentrations of BIIB033 vs time(A) Single ascending dose study and (B) multiple ascending dose study. Mean serum concentrations of.
Figure 1 Peripheral blood leukocyte subset counts during dimethyl fumarate treatmentComplete blood cell counts were obtained at baseline (n = 34) and at.

Figure 1 Peripheral blood leukocyte subset counts during dimethyl fumarate treatmentComplete blood cell counts were obtained at baseline (n = 34) and at.
Figure 2. ROC curves for different group comparisons

Figure 2. ROC curves for different group comparisons
Figure 2 DTI values between the hepatitis C group and controls(A) DTI FA values, (B) DTI diffusion values. *Statistically significant at FDR-adjusted p.

Figure 2 DTI values between the hepatitis C group and controls(A) DTI FA values, (B) DTI diffusion values. *Statistically significant at FDR-adjusted p.
Figure 1 Time points of blood sampling

Figure 1 Time points of blood sampling
Figure 3 Responder subset (A) Percentage of “responders” (nonprogressing patients) at week 25 after 6 months of treatment; percentage of “responders” in.

Figure 3 Responder subset (A) Percentage of “responders” (nonprogressing patients) at week 25 after 6 months of treatment; percentage of “responders” in.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google