1. The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile
How Universal are the QCD MC Model Tunes?
Rick Field
University of Florida
Outline
Chicago May 2012
How Universal are the QCD MC Model Tunes?
Do we need a separate tune for each center-of-mass energy? 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, etc.
Do we need a separate tune for each hard QCD subprocess? Jet Production, Drell-Yan Production, etc.
Do we need separate tunes for “Min-Bias” (MB) and the “underlying event” (UE) in a hard scattering process?
A close look at two PYTHIA tunes:
PYTHIA 6.2 Tune DW (CDF UE tune).
PYTHIA 6.4 Tune Z1 (CMS UE tune).
New CDF UE Data: The Tevatron Energy Scan (300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV).
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

2. QCD Monte-Carlo Models: High Transverse Momentum Jets
“Hard Scattering” Component
“Underlying Event”
Start with the perturbative 2-to-2 (or sometimes 2-to-3) parton-parton scattering and add initial and final-state gluon radiation (in the leading log approximation or modified leading log approximation).
The “underlying event” consists of the “beam-beam remnants” and from particles arising from soft or semi-soft multiple parton interactions (MPI).
Of course the outgoing colored partons fragment into hadron “jet” and inevitably “underlying event” observables receive contributions from initial and final-state radiation.
The “underlying event” is an unavoidable background to most collider observables and having good understand of it leads to more precise collider measurements!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

3. QCD Monte-Carlo Models: Lepton-Pair Production
“Hard Scattering” Component
“Underlying Event”
Start with the perturbative Drell-Yan muon pair production and add initial-state gluon radiation (in the leading log approximation or modified leading log approximation).
The “underlying event” consists of the “beam-beam remnants” and from particles arising from soft or semi-soft multiple parton interactions (MPI).
Of course the outgoing colored partons fragment into hadron “jet” and inevitably “underlying event” observables receive contributions from initial-state radiation.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

4. Traditional Approach
CDF Run 1 Analysis
Charged Particle Df Correlations PT > PTmin |h| < hcut
Leading Calorimeter Jet or Leading Charged Particle Jet or
Leading Charged Particle or
Z-Boson
“Transverse” region very sensitive to the “underlying event”!
Look at charged particle correlations in the azimuthal angle Df relative to a leading object (i.e. CaloJet#1, ChgJet#1, PTmax, Z-boson). For CDF PTmin = 0.5 GeV/c hcut = 1.
Define |Df| < 60o as “Toward”, 60o < |Df| < 120o as “Transverse”, and |Df| > 120o as “Away”.
All three regions have the same area in h-f space, Dh×Df = 2hcut×120o = 2hcut×2p/3. Construct densities by dividing by the area in h-f space.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

5. “Transverse” Charged Density
Shows the charged particle density in the “transverse” region for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1) at 7 TeV as defined by PTmax, PT(chgjet#1), and PT(muon-pair) from PYTHIA Tune DW at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Charged particle jets are constructed using the Anti-KT algorithm with d = 0.5.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

6. Min-Bias “Associated” Charged Particle Density
LHC14
LHC10
LHC7
Tevatron
900 GeV
RHIC
0.2 TeV → 1.96 TeV
(UE increase ~2.7 times)
1.96 TeV → 14 TeV
(UE increase ~1.9 times)
RHIC
Tevatron
LHC
Shows the “associated” charged particle density in the “transverse” region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1, not including PTmax) for “min-bias” events at 0.2 TeV, 0.9 TeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, 10 TeV, 14 TeV predicted by PYTHIA Tune DW at the particle level (i.e. generator level).
Linear scale!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

7. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
PYTHIA Tune DW
CMS
ATLAS
CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2. The data are uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune DW after detector simulation.
ATLAS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune DW at the generator level.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

8. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
PYTHIA Tune DW
Ratio
CMS
CMS
CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2. The data are uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune DW after detector simulation.
Ratio of CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2. The data are uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune DW after detector simulation.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

9. Charged Particle Density
New
Large increase in the UE in going from 1.96 TeV to 7 TeV as predicted by PYTHIA Tune DW!
CMS
CDF: Proton-Antiproton Collisions at 1.96 GeV
Lepton Cuts: pT > 20 GeV |h| < 1.0
Mass Cut: 70 < M(lepton-pair) < 110 GeV
Charged Particles: pT > 0.5 GeV/c |h| < 1.0
CMS: Proton-Proton Collisions at 7 GeV
Lepton Cuts: pT > 20 GeV |h| < 2.4
Mass Cut: 60 < M(lepton-pair) < 120 GeV
Charged Particles: pT > 0.5 GeV/c |h| < 2.0
CDF data at 1.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dN/dhdf, with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 1 for Drell-Yan production as a function of PT(Z) for the “toward”, “away”, and “transverse” regions compared with PYTHIA Tune DW.
CMS data at 7 TeV on the density of charged particles, dN/dhdf, with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2 for Drell-Yan production as a function of PT(Z) for the “toward”, “away”, and “transverse” regions compared with PYTHIA Tune DW.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

10. PYTHIA Tune DW CMS Overall PYTHIA Tune DW
is in amazingly good agreement with the
Tevatron Jet production and Drell-Yan data
and did a very good job in predicting the
LHC Jet production and Drell-Yan data!
(although not perfect)
CMS
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

11. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
CMS UE Data
CMS
CMS
Tune Z1
Tune Z1
CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged PTsum density, dPT/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
CMS corrected
data!
CMS corrected
data!
Very nice agreement!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

12. ATLAS publication – arXiv:1012.0791
ATLAS UE Data
ATLAS
ATLAS
Tune Z1
Tune Z1
ATLAS published data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
ATLAS published data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged PTsum density, dPT/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generrator level.
ATLAS publication – arXiv:
December 3, 2010
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

13. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
CMS-ATLAS UE Data
CMS: Chgjet#1
ATLAS: PTmax
Tune Z1
Tune Z1
CMS preliminary data at 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2.0 together with the ATLAS published data at 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2.5 The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
Amazing agreement!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

14. Jet Radius Dependence It seems that large jet radius “biases” the UE
The UE activity is higher
for large jet radius!
Tune Z1
The charged particle density in the “transverse” region as defined by the leading charged particle jet from PYTHIA Tune Z1. The charged particles are in the region pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < Charged particle jets are constructed using the Anti-KT algorithm with d = 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 from charged particles in the region pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2.5, however, the leading charged particle jet is required to have |h(chgjet#1)| < 1.5.
It seems that large jet radius “biases” the UE
to be more active!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

15. Tune Z1 describes the energy dependence fairly well!
PYTHIA Tune Z1
Tune Z1 describes the energy dependence fairly well!
CMS
CDF data at 1.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dN/dhdf, with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 1 for Drell-Yan production as a function of PT(Z) for the “toward”, “away”, and “transverse” regions compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1.
CMS data at 7 TeV on the density of charged particles, dN/dhdf, with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2 for Drell-Yan production as a function of PT(Z) for the “toward”, “away”, and “transverse” regions compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

16. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
PYTHIA Tune Z1
Tune Z1
Tune Z1
CMS data at 900 GeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2.0. The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
CDF data at TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading calorimeter jet (jet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 1.0. The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

17. PYTHIA Tune Z1 Overall amazingly good agreement
with the LHC and Tevatron
Jet production and Drell-Yan!
(although not perfect yet)
Tune Z1
Tune Z1
What about Min-Bias?
Tune Z1
Tune Z1
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

18. The Inelastic Non-Diffractive Cross-Section
Occasionally one of the parton-parton collisions is hard
(pT > ≈2 GeV/c)
Majority of “min-bias” events!
“Semi-hard” parton-parton collision
(pT < ≈2 GeV/c) + + +
+ …
Multiple-parton interactions (MPI)!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

19. The “Underlying Event”
Select inelastic non-diffractive events that contain a hard scattering
Hard parton-parton collisions is hard
(pT > ≈2 GeV/c)
1/(pT)4→ 1/(pT2+pT02)2
“Semi-hard” parton-parton collision
(pT < ≈2 GeV/c)
The “underlying-event” (UE)! + +
+ …
Given that you have one hard scattering it is more probable to have MPI! Hence, the UE has more activity than “min-bias”.
Multiple-parton interactions (MPI)!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

20. Model of sND + + + + … 1/(pT)4→ 1/(pT2+pT02)2
Allow leading hard scattering to go to zero pT with same cut-off as the MPI!
Model of the inelastic non-diffractive cross section!
1/(pT)4→ 1/(pT2+pT02)2
“Semi-hard” parton-parton collision
(pT < ≈2 GeV/c) + + +
+ …
Multiple-parton interactions (MPI)!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

21. UE Tunes + + + + … “Underlying Event”
Allow primary hard-scattering to go to pT = 0 with same cut-off!
Fit the “underlying event” in a hard scattering process.
1/(pT)4→ 1/(pT2+pT02)2
“Min-Bias” (add single & double diffraction)
“Min-Bias” (ND) + + +
Predict MB (ND)!
Predict MB (IN)!
+ …
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

22. Min-Bias Collisions Okay not perfect, but remember
ALICE
INEL = NSD + SD
NSD = ND + DD
CMS
Tune Z1
Tune Z1
CMS NSD data on the charged particle rapidity distribution at 7 TeV compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1. The plot shows the average number of particles per NSD collision per unit h, (1/NNSD) dN/dh.
ALICE NSD data on the charged particle rapidity distribution at 900 GeV compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1. The plot shows the average number of particles per INEL collision per unit h, (1/NINEL) dN/dh.
Okay not perfect, but remember
we know that SD and DD are not modeled well!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

23. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
MB versus UE
Divide be 2p
NSD = ND + DD
CMS
Tune Z1
CMS NSD data on the charged particle rapidity distribution at 7 TeV compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1. The plot shows the average number of charged particles per NSD collision per unit h, (1/NNSD) dN/dh.
CMS NSD data on the charged particle rapidity distribution at 7 TeV compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1. The plot shows the average number of charged particles per NSD collision per unit h-f, (1/NNSD) dN/dhdf.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

24. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
MB versus UE
CMS
Tune Z1
Factor of 2!
NSD = ND + DD
Tune Z1
Shows the density of charged particles in the “transverse” region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (All pT, |h| < 2) at 7 TeV from PYTHIA Tune Z1.
CMS NSD data on the charged particle rapidity distribution at 7 TeV compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1. The plot shows the average number of charged particles per NSD collision per unit h-f, (1/NNSD) dN/dhdf.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

25. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
MB versus UE
ATLAS
CMS
Tune Z1
Factor of 2!
NSD = ND + DD
ATLAS data on the density of charged particles in the “transverse” region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (pT > 0.1 GeV/c, |h| < 2.5) at 7 TeV compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1.
CMS NSD data on the charged particle rapidity distribution at 7 TeV compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1. The plot shows the average number of charged particles per NSD collision per unit h-f, (1/NNSD) dN/dhdf.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

26. NSD Multiplicity Distribution
Difficult to produce enough events with large multiplicity!
CMS
Tune Z1
Generator level charged multiplicity distribution (all pT, |h| < 2) at 900 GeV and 7 TeV. Shows the NSD = HC + DD prediction for Tune Z1. Also shows the CMS NSD data.
Okay not perfect!
But not that bad!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

27. Difficult to produce enough events with large multiplicity!
MB & UE
“Min-Bias”
“Underlying Event”
CMS
CMS
Tune Z1
Tune Z1
Difficult to produce enough events with large multiplicity!
Difficult to produce enough events with large “transverse” multiplicity at low hard scale!
Generator level charged multiplicity distribution (all pT, |h| < 2) at 900 GeV and 7 TeV. Shows the NSD = HC + DD prediction for Tune Z1. Also shows the CMS NSD data.
CMS corrected data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the charged particle multiplicity distribution in the “transverse” region for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 2) as defined by the leading charged particle jet with PT(chgjet#1) > 3 GeV/c compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

28. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
MB&UE Working Group
MB & UE Common Plots
CMS
ATLAS
The LPCC MB&UE Working Group has suggested several MB&UE “Common Plots” the all the LHC groups can produce and compare with each other.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

29. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
CMS Common Plots
Observable
900 GeV
7 TeV
MB1: dNchg/dh Nchg ≥ 1
|h| < 0.8 pT > 0.5 Gev/c & 1.0 GeV/c
Done
QCD
MB2: dNchg/dpT Nchg ≥ 1 |h| < 0.8
Stalled
MB3: Multiplicity Distribution
|h| < 0.8 pT > 0.5 GeV/c & 1.0 GeV/c
MB4: <pT> versus Nchg
In progress
(Antwerp)
UE1: Transverse Nchg & PTsum as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax
(M. Zakaria)
Direct charged particles (including leptons) corrected to the particle level with no corrections for SD or DD.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

30. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
ALICE-ATLAS UE
ALICE
ATLAS
Tune Z1
Tune Z1
ALICE preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
ATLAS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generrator level.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

31. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
ALICE-ATLAS UE
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

32. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Tevatron Energy Scan
300 GeV
1.96 TeV
900 GeV
Just before the shutdown of the Tevatron CDF has collected more than 10M “min-bias” events at several center-of-mass energies!
300 GeV 12.1M MB Events
900 GeV 54.3M MB Events
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

33. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
New CDF Energies
Tune Z1
ATLAS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
Predictions for CDF on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 0.8 from PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level.
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

34. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
CDF Common Plots
Observable
300 GeV
900 GeV
1.96 TeV
MB1: dNchg/dh Nchg ≥ 1
|h| < 0.8 pT > 0.5 Gev/c & 1.0 GeV/c
In progress
(Rick, Craig, David)
MB2: dNchg/dpT Nchg ≥ 1 |h| < 0.8
MB3: Multiplicity Distribution
|h| < 0.8 pT > 0.5 GeV/c & 1.0 GeV/c
MB4: <pT> versus Nchg
UE1: Transverse Nchg & PTsum as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax
(R. Field)
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

35. Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
gmbsar
Files = 273 Events = 66,374,130
Size = 803,837,367 KB
1.96 TeV
1 and only 1 Q12 Vertex
P0-5 19,420,876 Events
900 GeV
0 or 1 Q12 Vertex
38,306,169 Events
Raw CDF data at 300 GeV, 900 GeV, and 1.96 TeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dhdf, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 1.0.
300 GeV
0 or 1 Q12 Vertex
7,484,514 Events
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS

36. How Universal are the Tunes?
What we are learning should
allow for more precise
predictions at future LHC energies
(10 TeV, 13 TeV)!
Do we need a separate tune for each center-of-mass energy? 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, etc.
PYTHIA Tune DW did a nice (although not perfect) job predicting the LHC Jet Production and Drell-Yan UE data. I am still hoping for a single tune that will describe all energies!
Tune Z1 also very good!
Soon we will have UE data at 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, & 8 TeV and can map out the energy dependence!
Color
Connections
Do we need a separate tune for each hard QCD subprocess? Jet Production, Drell-Yan Production, etc.
PARP(90)
The same tune can describe both Jet Production and Drell-Yan!
Do we need separate tunes for “Min-Bias” (MB) and the “underlying event” (UE) in a hard scattering process?
PARP(82)
Diffraction
PHTHIA Tune Z1 does fairly well at both the UE and MB, but you cannot expect such a naïve approach to be perfect!
NW-Argonne Higgs Workshop Chicage May 16, 2012
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS