1. NEW & EMERGING SOURCES OF REVENUE FOR DEVELOPMENT

2. Key Issues and Priorities
Gradual Increase in budgetary outlays for Social Sectors over the last decade
Changes in Centre – State sharing of resources since
“Reforms” in budgetary processes initiated by the Union Government
Growing needs for Public Expenditure in the state
Need to expand the Resource Base
Bottlenecks in effective utilisation of funds
Concerns pertaining to Transparency, spaces for Participation and Accountability

3. Odisha’s Budget Priorities for key Social Sectors
Share of S&ME Dept budget in State Budget and GSDP (in %)
Share of H & FW budget in State Budget and GSDP (in %)

4. Budgetary Outlay of Select States for Education Sector & Health Sector in India(Figures in Rs. Crore)
Education Sector
Health Sector AE AE RE BE 1
Assam
8290
9812
13104
14043 2
Bihar
14930
16395
24750
22123 3
Chhattisgarh
5499
3646
6278
8473 4
Jharkhand
3105
3870
5213
6712 5
Madhya Pradesh
6484
7893
11625
15435 6
Maharashtra
32594
34775
40063
42621 7
Odisha
8500
10261
12104
14026 8
Rajasthan
19116
21978
25007 9
Tamil Nadu*
23333
24633
27809 10
Uttar Pradesh
29784
32615
41978
51124 AE AE RE BE 1
Assam
1686
1739
4211
3762 2
Bihar
2592
3610
4985
8235 3
Chhattisgarh
1500
2302
1179
2013 4
Jharkhand
1065
1193
1865
2210 5
Madhya Pradesh
3287
4530
5166
6670 6
Maharashtra
6537
7996
10371
9320 7
Odisha
1973
3204
3882
4794 8
Rajasthan
5871
7518
8799 9
Tamil Nadu*
8028
8245
9073 10
Uttar Pradesh
8974
11117
14393
17829

5. What part of State Budget is met from State’s Own Revenue (State’s Own Tax Revenue and Own Non-Tax Revenue) AE RE BE
Bihar
25.1
20.8
22.2
Assam
21.2
26.0
27.5
Odisha
42.0
36.5
35.3
Uttar Pradesh
40.1
33.3
36.3
Madhya Pradesh
43.8
38.4
Jharkhand
36.8
34.1
40.2
Chhattisgarh
45.0
46.2
42.7
Rajasthan
45.4
42.9
44.7
Tamil Nadu
59.2
60.4
53.2
Maharashtra
64.9
61.6
64.3

6. New and Emerging Sources of revenue for Increased development Space in Odisha
Corporate Social Responsibility Fund (CSR)
Rs. 344 cr was spent in by 287 Companies (FIDR White Paper)
6 districts namely Malkanagiri, Kandhamala, Nuapada, Boudh, Gajapati and Deogarh don’t have CSR activities
60% of the investment done directly by CSR, 6% through Govt and 12% by CSOs
Peripherial Development Fund (PDF)
5% of annual net profit for peripherial development (Local Priority)
Constitution of Rehabilation and Periphery development Advisory Committee in 2006
No legal Backing (executive in Nature)
Lack of clarity of Sponsering department

7. Cont… Odisha Mineral Bearing Area Development Corporation (OMBADC)
Constituted as SPV in 2014 to take care of development in Mineral bearing districts
Fund from additional NPV from mining leases
Fund available Rs 1661 Cr
Rs 818 Cr was to be spent in 8 mineral rich districts, Rs 777Cr was released last year
Bulk is not utilised
Odisha Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board (OBOCWWB)
Constituted in 2009 (Cess from Construction Contractors and Companies)
Rs 914 Cr has been accrued
Only 13% spent

8. Cont… Compensatory Afforstation Fund District Mineral Fund (DMF) CAMPA
State CAMPA will deposit fund with National CAMPA
Upon submission of APO, Central CAMPA will release funds upto 90% state’s share
As on March, 2015, Rs Cr is lying with Central CAMPA, Out of which Rs Cr has been deposited by Odisha
The detail guideline is yet to come
From to , State received Rs 1155 Cr, 13% is unutilised
Prime objective of the futilisation of fund is diluted
District Mineral Fund (DMF)
Estd. In january 2015.
Formulated in 30 Districts but holds promise in 12 mineral rich districts
10% of royalty to be paid by Mining Companies
As on Aug Rs Cr has been collected
PMKKKY provides a framework

9. Key issues Full Fund Utilisation and Effectiness of Fund Utilisation
Inclusive Planning and Integration
Transparency
Budget transparency at district and sub district level
Statement on extra budgetary resoures
Civic Awarness

10. Thank You