Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PHYS 3446 – Lecture #2 Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PHYS 3446 – Lecture #2 Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu"— Presentation transcript:

1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #2 Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu
Introduction History on Atomic Models Rutherford Scattering Rutherford Scattering with Coulomb force Scattering Cross Section Measurement of Cross Sections Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

2 Announcements Mail distribution list is ready. Go ahead and subscribe!
5 points extra credit if done by next Wednesday, Sept. 6 3 points extra credit if done by next Friday, Sept. 8 Extra credit opportunities Obtain a particle data booklet and a pocket diary Subscribe to the Symmetry Magazine (free!) Request for printed copies Subscribe to the printed copies of CERN Courier Magazine Send to Janice Voss at 3 points each if done by Wednesday, Sept. 6. Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

3 Why do Physics? Exp.{ Theory {
To understand nature through experimental observations and measurements (Research) Establish limited number of fundamental laws, usually with mathematical expressions Predict nature’s courses Theory and Experiment work hand-in-hand Theory works generally under restricted conditions Discrepancies between experimental measurements and theory presents opportunities to quantum leap Improves our everyday lives, though some laws can take a while till we see amongst us Theory { Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

4 Condensed matter/Nano-Science/Chemistry
Structure of Matter Matter Molecule Atom Nucleus High Energy Physics Baryon (Hadron) u Quark 10-2m 10-9m 10-10m 10-14m 10-15m <10-19m Condensed matter/Nano-Science/Chemistry protons, neutrons, mesons, etc. p,W,L... top, bottom, charm, strange, up, down Atomic Physics Nuclear Physics Electron (Lepton) <10-18m Give scale and relationship to the domain that high energy physicists work in. Introduce the fundamental bits of matter loosely so that audience can point back to bulk matter. Domain. Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

5 Theory for Microscopic Scale, QM
Difficult to describe Small scale phenom. w/ just CM and EM The study of atomic structure led to quantum mechanics Long range EM force is responsible for holding atoms together (why ?) Yet sufficiently weak for QM to estimate properties of atoms reliably In Nucleus regime, the simple Coulomb force does not work. Why? The force in nucleus holds positively charged particles together The known forces in nature Strong ~ 1 Electro-magnetic ~ 10-2 Weak ~ 10-5 Gravitational ~ 10-38 Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

6 Evolution of Atomic Models
1803: Dalton’s billiard ball model 1897: J.J. Thompson Discovered electrons Built on all the work w/ cathode tubes Called corpuscles Made a bold claim that these make up atoms Measured m/e ratio 1904: J.J. Thompson Proposed a “plum pudding” model of atoms Negatively charged electrons embedded in a uniformly distributed positive charge Cathode ray tube Thompson’s tubes Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

7 History of Atomic Models cnt’d
1911: Geiger and Marsden with Rutherford performed a scattering experiment with alpha particles shot on a thin gold foil Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

8 History of Atomic Models cnt’d
1912: Rutherford’s planetary model, an atomic model with a positively charged heavy core surrounded by circling electrons Deficiency of instability. Why? The electrons will eventually get pulled onto the nucleus, destroying the atom Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

9 History of Atomic Models cnt’d
1913: Neils Bohr proposed the Orbit Model, where electrons occupy well quantified orbits Electrons can only transition to pre-defined orbits Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

10 History of Atomic Models cnt’d
1926: Schrödinger and de Broglie proposed the Electron Cloud Model based on quantum mechanics Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

11 Rutherford Scattering
A fixed target experiment with alpha particle as projectile shot on thin gold foil Alpha particle’s energy is low  Speed is well below 0.1c (non-relativistic) An elastic scattering of the particles What are the conserved quantities in an elastic scattering? Momentum Kinetic Energy Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

12 Elastic Scattering From momentum conservation
ma q After Collisions ma mt f mt From momentum conservation From kinetic energy conservation From these two, we obtain Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

13 Analysis Case I If mt<<ma, left-hand side becomes positive
va and vt must be in the same direction Using the actual masses and We obtain If mt=me, then mt/ma~10-4.  Thus, pe/pa0<10-4. Change of momentum of alpha particle is negligible Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

14 Analysis Case II If mt>>ma,
left-hand side of the above becomes negative va and vt is opposite direction Using the actual masses and We obtain If mt=mAu, then mt/ma~50.  Thus, pe/pa0~2pa0. Change of momentum of alpha particle is large a particle can even recoil Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

15 Rutherford Scattering with EM Force 1
Let’s take into account only the EM force between the a and the atom Coulomb force is a central force, so a conservative force Coulomb potential between particles with Ze and Z’e electrical charge separated by distance r is Since the total energy is conserved, Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

16 Rutherford Scattering with EM Force 2
The distance vector r is always the same direction as the force throughout the entire motion, so the net torque (rxF) is 0. Since there is no net torque, the angular momentum (l=rxp) is conserved.  The magnitude of the angular momentum is l=mvb. Impact parameter From the energy relation, we obtain From the definition of angular momentum, we obtain an equation of motion From energy conservation, we obtain another equation of motion Centrifugal barrier Effective potential Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

17 Rutherford Scattering with EM Force 3
Rearranging the terms for approach, we obtain and Integrating this from r0 to infinity gives the angular distribution of the outgoing alpha particle Distance of closest approach Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

18 Rutherford Scattering with EM Force 4
What happens at the DCA? Kinetic energy reduces to 0. The incident alpha could turn around and accelerate We can obtain This allows us to determine DCA for a given potential and c0. Define scattering angle q as the changes in the asymptotic angles of the trajectory, we obtain Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

19 Rutherford Scattering with EM Force 5
For a Coulomb potential DCA can be obtained for the given impact parameter b, And the angular distribution becomes Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

20 Rutherford Scattering with EM Force 6
Replace the variable 1/r=x, and performing the integration, we obtain This can be rewritten Solving this for b, we obtain Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

21 Rutherford Scattering with EM Force 7
From the solution for b, we can learn the following For fixed b, E and Z’ The scattering is larger for a larger value of Z. Makes perfect sense since Coulomb potential is stronger with larger Z. Results in larger deflection. For fixed b, Z and Z’ The scattering angle is larger when E is smaller. If particle has low energy, its velocity is smaller Spends more time in the potential, suffering greater deflection For fixed Z, Z’, and E The scattering angle is larger for smaller impact parameter b Makes perfect sense also, since as the incident particle is closer to the nucleus, it feels stronger Coulomb force. Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu

22 Assignments Compute the masses of electron, proton and alpha particles in MeV/c2, using E=mc2. Need to look up masses of electrons, protons and alpha particles in kg. Compute the gravitational and the Coulomb forces between two protons separated by 10-10m and compare their strengths Derive the following equations in your book: Eq. # 1.3, 1.17, 1.32 Must show detailed work and accompany explanations These assignments are due next Wednesday, Sept. 6. Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu


Download ppt "PHYS 3446 – Lecture #2 Wednesday, Aug. 30, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google