1. A Meta-Analysis of Miniaturized Versus Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation in Valve Surgery 
Chuangshi Wang, MM, Kun Hua, PhD, Lu Yin, PhD, Yang Wang, MSc, Wei Li, PhD 
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
DOI: /j.athoracsur
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1 Flow diagram of the literature search process.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
Forest plots for (A) intensive care unit (ICU) stay and (B) total hospital stay comparing miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) versus conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) in randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies. 1p for heterogeneity. 2Weights are from random effects analysis. (CI = confidence interval; WMD = weighted mean difference.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
Forest plots for binary outcomes (events) comparing miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) versus conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) in randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies. (A) Mortality. (B) Arrhythmia. (C) Neurologic events. (D) Inotropic support. 1p for heterogeneity. (CI = confidence interval; RR = risk ratio.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

5. Supplemental Fig 1
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

6. Supplemental Fig 2
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions