1. HBr
6pp.. vs. V(m+17) state interactions

2. https://notendur.hi.is/jil3/work/HBr/New%20states.pdf:7
2, 1,0 8
Idea
See slides below)

3. https://notendur.hi.is/jil3/work/HBr/New%20states.pdf:

4. https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/papers/jcp93-4624-90.pdf:
From Q lines
DE(J´,J´-1)
This differs a lot from Longs
Results (Why?): J´

5. https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/papers/jcp93-4624-90.pdf:

6. Is this peak split? Are these J´= 0 and 1 peaks In which case J´=8Br
Atomic
Line? ?

7. DE(J´,J´-1) !! J´ It could be that there are two peaks
It could be that there are two peaks
In this are in which case j’ increases by one
In which case the highest J´observed is indeed J´=8
But not J´=7(?)
DE(J´,J´-1) !! J´

8. Fig. 4 for HBr-New States-paper: Energetics:J
6pp
V(m+17)
V(m+18)
E(n=6) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ref:
C&G
"Tables"
dropbox
250512

9. V1S+(v´=m+18) : Energy / cm-1 Near-reonance Interaction J´
E1S+(n=6; v´=0) 8 8 7
Off-reonance
Interactions 2
V1S+(v´=m+17)
6pp3S-(v´=0)
and PPT file for Fig.4 in HBr-New States-paper

10. DnJ,J+1 = 2(B´-B´´)J´ + 2(B´-B´´) for Q lines :
DnJ,J+1 = 2(B´-B´´)J´ + 2(B´-B´´) for Q lines
a = b (slope = intersect)

11. a(intersect)= = -15.145 ± 4.46 b(slope) = -11.788 ± 1.24 i.e. for J´=0

12. This is what one expected to give closes a and b values
Skip top and bottom points

13. This is what one expected to give closes a and b values

14. Closest values for slope and intersect ERGO: J´min = 3, J+1 =4!
b = ± 1.01
Closest values for slope and intersect
ERGO: J´min = 3, J+1 =4!
a = ± 6.25
b = ± 1.01

15. Large variation in the match of “a” and “b” depending on what peaks are taken
account of. ERGO: comparing “a” and “b” is NOT useful tool to use for
Assignment in this case (as might be expected)