1. Introduction on data submissions, quality checks and feedback stages
EEA/ETC-ACM | 3rd of October 2017 | 22nd EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment and Management, Lisbon
Introduction on data submissions, quality checks and feedback stages
EEA & ETC-ACM work compiled by Artur Gsella, Michel Houssiau and Jaume Targa

2. Presentation plan Automatic checks in CDR Final feedback stage
Feedback reports

3. Final Feedback (Release)
Automatic checks in CDR
CDR
Countries
DATABASES
Blocker QA
Draft
Final Feedback (Release)

4. Final Feedback (Release)
Final feedback stage
Correction Requested
CDR
Completion QA
Countries
DATABASES QA
Draft
Final Feedback (Release) QA

5. Final Feedback (Release)
Feedback reports
Correction Requested
Technically Accepted
CDR
Completion
Feedback Reports QA
Countries
DATABASES QA
Draft
Final Feedback (Release) QA

6. Status of data deliveries and feedback
EEA/ETC-ACM | 3rd of October 2017 | 22nd EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment and Management, Lisbon
Status of data deliveries and feedback
EEA & ETC-ACM work compiled by Artur Gsella, Michel Houssiau and Jaume Targa

7. Presentation plan Data deliveries and feedback for 2016 (B-G)
Scoring for E2a data flow
Further actions
(Status on 03/10/2017)

8. Data deliveries and feedback for 2016 (B-G)
Data delivery timeline for B-G data flows – earlier start of peaks above 15 envelopes/day.

9. Data deliveries and feedback for 2016 (B-G)
The feedback is based both
on QA checks running in CDR and additional checks performed outside CDR (geometry validation).
Data flow B: 31 countries (28 EU + IS, NO and TR).

10. Data deliveries and feedback for 2016 (B-G)
Automated final feedback (acceptance/correction request) based on QA results.
Data flow C: 30 countries (27 EU + IS, NO and TR).

11. Data deliveries and feedback for 2016 (B-G)
Automated final feedback (acceptance/correction request) based on QA results.
Data flow D: 36 countries (27 EU + AL, BA, CH, IS, MK, NO, RS, TR and XK).

12. Data deliveries and feedback for 2016 (B-G)
Similar as for data flow B, the feedback is based both
on QA checks running in CDR and additional checks performed outside CDR (import into SQL DB, aggregations).
Due to amount of data, complexity of checks and allowed partial resubmissions, process is more difficult to follow than in case of B data flow.
Data flow E1a: 36 countries (27 EU + AL, BA, CH, IS, MK, NO, RS, TR and XK).

13. Data deliveries and feedback for 2016 (B-G)
Automated final feedback (acceptance/correction request) based on QA results.
Data flow D1b: 11 EU countries (includes AQ models and objective estimation).

14. Data deliveries and feedback for 2016 (B-G)
Data flow E1b: 7 EU countries (includes values from AQ models and objective estimation).

15. Data deliveries and feedback for 2016 (B-G)
Automated final feedback (acceptance/correction request) based on QA results.
Data flow G: 27 countries (26 EU + NO).

16. Scoring of E2a data flow
Daily follow up on average data delivery time (measurement  EEA’s data base).
Data flow E2a: current scoring status for 2017

17. Further actions 2017
Follow up on QA issues
Follow up/ feedback on B and E1a/b

18. Further actions 2017: H-K
Data processing (monitoring, QA) is not well adapted yet to follow the H-K deliveries where same year submissions occur in many envelopes.
We recommend uploading H-K reports in one envelope/country.

19. Further actions 2017: H-K
QA checks in CDR
(Automated) final feedback stage
Feedback reports

20. EEA/ETC-ACM | 3rd of October 2017 | 22nd EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment and Management, Lisbon
Thank you for your work!

21. Progress on data quality
2013
2014
2015
Import of compliance related data sets (B, C, G) into data bases using the same constraints on interlinkages – notice improvement towards the latest year.