1. Discussion Case study - mapping techniques
A proposal
Against the background of the seven hypotheses presented in this document, the European Forum for Geostatistics (EFGS), under a generous grant from EUROSTAT, have from the beginning of this year started work on the GEOSTAT ESSnet project. The project consortium of nine NSI’s is led by Statistics Norway. The need to take action for the integration of geography and statistics should not be limited to the European scale.
We therefore propose:
The establishment of a Global Forum For Geostatistics (GFGS) to serve as a professional reference group (PRG) for Geostatistics and provide a professional link between UN and the NSI’s in issues related to this field.. This PRG will primarily be concerned with questions related to the integration of geography (GSDI projects) and statistics (GEOSTAT)
The initiation of a joint UN spatial data infrastructure (SDI) project for geostatistics. This is the first step towards a GSDI based Global Integrated Information System (GGIISS) and should be developed in close cooperation with the national mapping agency (NMA) -led GSDI and INSPIRE projects.
The initiation of the GEOSTAT GSSgrid project to provide a high-resolution harmonised infrastructure for geostatistics liberated from administrative areas and demonstrating its power and utility through a UN project to plot the global population on km grids.
Keywords: GSDI (Global Spatial Data Infrastructure), GSS (Global Statistical System), Small area statistics, GIS (Geographical Information System), GGIISS (Global Geographic Integrated Information Systems of Systems)
Mrs Diana Makarenko-Piirsalu
MSc in Landscape Ecology and Environmental Protection
Geolytics OÜ
Mere tee 15, Saviranna,
Jõelähtme vald, Harjumaa, ESTONIA
Mob
ESTP Course: Use of GIS in NSIs – Representing statistics on thematic maps,
Kongsvinger, Norway, 5th to 37th of March, 2013
Attribution (by) Licensees may copy, distribute, display and perform the work and make derivative works based on it only if they give the author or licensor the credits in the manner specified by these.

2. Map critics
Does the map convey the message for defined purpose and audience? Propose a better solution.
Consider : mapping technique, data standardisation, classification etc
Is the scale used appropriate? Propose a better solution.
Can you find aspects to set-up an improved layout?
Is title, subtitle, legend appropriate?
How can you improve the map element positions?
How can you improve colour composition?
Is there any reason for improving typography ?
Is the map easily readable?

3. THANK YOU!
Mrs Diana Makarenko-Piirsalu
MSc in Landscape Ecology and Environmental Protection
Geolytics OÜ
Mere tee 15, Saviranna,
Jõelähtme vald, Harjumaa, ESTONIA
Mob
ESTP Course: Use of GIS in NSIs – Representing statistics on thematic maps,
Kongsvinger, Norway, 5th to 37th of March, 2013