Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySpencer Carpenter Modified over 5 years ago
1
Associate Professor and Consultant of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
GI Bleeding Approach Dr Nahla Azzam Associate Professor and Consultant of Gastroenterology and Hepatology King Saud University
2
Case 1 A 65 years old male referred for evaluation of 4 months HX of weight loss, fatigue , and weakness. He also gave history of passing dark stool intermittently for the last 3 months. He is known DM on insulin , hyperlipedemia on statin and occasionally aspirin
3
What other information you would like to ask?
5
What is the likely diagnosis?
6
Causes of UGIB Gibson et al. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2011;21:
7
What will be the next step?
9
Case 2 A 42 years old male complaining of chronic recurrent epigastric pain which worsen recently especially when he is fasting For the last 2 days he started to have frequent vomiting associated with blood He is not known to have any chronic medical problems and not on any medications
10
What is the best next step in the approach of such patient?
11
Detailed HX Full Physical examination
12
How would you assess the bleeding severity?
13
Risk Stratification AIMS65 Glasgow- Blatchford Score (GBS)
Rockall Score Modified-GBS AIMS65
14
Bardou et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:97-104.
Urea CBC Physical Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding History Bardou et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:
15
Hearnshaw et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;32:215-24.
History Physical History Panel B shows the Rockall score, with point values assigned for each of three clinical variables (age and the presence of shock and coexisting illnesses) and two endoscopic variables (diagnosis and stigmata of recent hemorrhage). The complete Rockall score ranges from 0 to 11, with higher scores indicating higher risk. Patients with a clinical Rockall score of 0 or a complete Rockall score of 2 or less are considered to be at low risk for rebleeding or death. Data are from Blatchford et al.16 and Rockall et al.17 GI denotes gastrointestinal. To convert the values for blood urea nitrogen to milligrams per deciliter, divide by Hearnshaw et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;32:
16
What is the diagnosis and the associated risk factors?
17
Spurting Blood Gralnek et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:928-37.
High-risks lesions are those that spurt blood (Forrest grade IA, Panel A), ooze blood (grade IB, Panel B), contain a nonbleeding visible vessel (grade IIA, Panel C), or have an adherent clot (grade IIB, Panel D). Low-risk lesions are those that have a flat, pigmented spot (grade IIC, Panel E) or a clean base (grade III, Panel F). Gralnek et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:
18
Non-bleeding Visible Vessel
Gralnek et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:
19
Flat, Pigmented Spot Gralnek et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:
20
Clean Base Gralnek et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:
22
H pylori Patients with bleeding peptic ulcers should be tested for H. pylori Receive eradication therapy if present Confirmation of eradication Negative H. pylori diagnostic tests obtained in the acute setting should be repeated Barkun et al. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:
23
Case 3 A 52 years old lady presented to ER with one day history of vomiting of fresh blood. She also notices passing black tarry stool. She is feeling dizzy and unwell Past HX of jaundice no other medical problems and not on any medications Clinically jaundiced and pale Vital signs BP 100/70 pulse 110/min Abdomen examination showed liver span of 7 cm and spleen felt 3 fingers below costal margin with few spider nevi seen over chest
24
what is the likely diagnosis of this case and list 4 common aetiology ?
27
What is the priority in the management of this patient?
28
IV Fluid Resuscitation
29
What is the target Hb and INR prior to the endoscopy for this cases?
30
3- Blood Transfusions The role of transfusion in clinically stable patients with mild GI bleeding remains controversial, with uncertainty at which hemoglobin level transfusion should be initiated Literature suggesting poor outcomes in patients managed with a liberal transfusion Marik PE, Corwin HL. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 2667 – 2674 Restellini S, Kherad O, Jairath V et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 316 – 322
31
3- Blood Transfusions (cont’d)
The restrictive RBC transfusion had significantly improved survival and reduced rebleeding Villanueva C, Colomo A, Bosch A et al. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 11 – 21
32
3- Blood Transfusions (Cont’d)
7 gm/dl 9 gm/dl
33
3- Blood Transfusions (Cont’d)
34
Patients receiving anticoagulants
Correction of coagulopathy is recommended Endoscopy should not be delayed for a high INR unless the INR is supratherapeutic Barkun et al. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:
35
Timing and need for early endoscopy
Definition of early endoscopy Ranges from 6 to 24 hours AFTER INITIAL PRESENTATION May need to be delayed or deferred: Active acute coronary syndromes Suspected perforation Barkun et al. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:
36
Case 4 A 47 years old male known to have alcoholic liver disease presented with hematemesis of large amount and dizziness after resuscitation an upper GI endoscopy done which showed multiple large oesophageal varix which was banded , however 12 hrs post endoscopy he continued to have melena with drop of Hb and hypotension
37
What is the next step in the patient management?
38
Gastroenterology Interventional Rad. Intensive Care Surgery
YOU ARE NOT ALONE Intensive Care Surgery
39
Summary for steps of GI bledding approach
1- Initial assessment 2- Hemodynamic status and resuscitation 3- Blood transfusions 4- Risk assessment & stratification 5- Pre-endoscopic medical therapy 6- Timing of endoscopy 7- Endoscopic therapy 8- Post-endoscopy
41
Bardou et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:97-104.
Algorithm for optimal management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. On presentation with UGIB, appropriate resuscitation should be carried out. Patients should be assessed and those at very low risk may be discharged. All other patients should be admitted as inpatients and categorized as low-risk or high-risk groups to determine treatment options. Oral PPI therapy can be adequate for low-risk patients but those at high risk should be treated with endoscopy and intravenous, high-dose PPI. All patients should be considered for secondary prophylaxis, including Helicobacter pylori testing and treatments, use of COX2 antagonists as an alternative to NSAIDs, and PPI for those taking low-dose aspirin. Abbreviations: COX2, cyclooxygenase 2 (also known as prostaglandin G/H synthetase 2); UGIB, upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Bardou et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:
42
When to go to surgery? Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Bingener, 2011
43
Conclusions Resuscitation should be initiated prior to any diagnostic procedure Gastrointestinal endoscopy allows visualization of the stigmata, accurate assessment of the level of risk and treatment of the underlying lesion Intravenous PPI therapy after endoscopy is crucial to decrease the risk of cardiovascular complications and to prevent recurrence of bleeding Helicobacter pylori testing should be performed in the acute setting Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding Bardou et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.