Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKatriina Martta Majanlahti Modified over 5 years ago
1
Public Schools District Supervisors
FINDINGS/ ISSUES AND CONCERNS Public Schools District Supervisors
2
Findings to cater the needs of the pupils
• Reading materials are sufficient enough to cater the needs of the pupils • All teachers were allowed to utilize school resources to augment their needs in teaching
3
NUMBER OF SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTING THE 2QAD
Findings • All public elementary schools are implementing 2QAD NUMBER OF SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTING THE 2QAD District Implementing Not Implementing Ambray 10 Dapdapan Del Remedio 9 Fule Almeda Lakeside 5 San Francisco 11 Sto. Angel Total 65 Although schools are implementing the 2QAD, but they are not consistent in doing it. Furthermore, the questions that they prepared are of NAT style; not HOTS questions
4
NUMBER OF DepEd PERSONNEL WHO CONDUCTED RESEARCHES
Findings • Few DepEd personnel conducted researches NUMBER OF DepEd PERSONNEL WHO CONDUCTED RESEARCHES District Number Total Number of Teachers and Sch. Head plus PSDS Percentage Ambray 13 145 8.97% Dapdapan 21 140 15.00% Del Remedio 11 179 6.15% Fule Almeda 14 137 10.22% Lakeside 26 169 15.38% San Francisco 29 204 14.22% Sto. Angel 22 15.17% TOTAL 136 1,119 12.15% As gleaned in the table, only 12.15% of the total number of DepEd personnel in public elementary schools conducted research. Hence, there is a need to cultivate the culture of research in the Division of San Pablo City.
5
QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT RESULTS (Third Quarter)
Findings QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT RESULTS (Third Quarter) District MPS Ambray 77.91% Dapdapan 73.97% Del Remedio 79.19% Fule Almeda Lakeside 76.48% San Francisco 78.79% Sto. Angel 77.14% Average 77.52%
6
Findings • STATUS OF SIP/AIP PERTAINING TO CURRICULUM
7
Findings • STATUS OF SIP/AIP PERTAINING TO CURRICULUM (Contd……)
8
Findings • STATUS OF SIP/AIP PERTAINING TO CURRICULUM (Contnd….)
9
Findings • STATUS OF SIP/AIP PERTAINING TO CURRICULUM (Contnd….)
10
PHIL-IRI RESULTS (ENGLISH)
Findings • PHIL-IRI RESULTS (ENGLISH) District Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent PRE-TEST POST-TEST Ambray 144 50 425 704 1,049 1,560 1,481 1,146 Dapdapan 65 18 1,386 737 1,152 1,365 675 1,104 Del Remedio 176 112 1,389 4,009 1,415 1,449 985 1,532 Fule Almeda 102 29 668 522 736 1,262 394 986 Lakeside 170 30 2,209 1,007 1,226 1,595 683 1,592 San Francisco 136 45 2,236 1,655 2,014 849 1,718 Sto. Angel 198 28 1,188 548 1,213 1,419 583 1,191 Total 991 312 9501 8679 8446 10664 5650 9269
11
PHIL-IRI RESULTS (FILIPINO)
Findings • PHIL-IRI RESULTS (FILIPINO) District Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent PRE-TEST POST-TEST Ambray 72 30 837 407 1,315 1,390 919 1,692 Dapdapan 32 11 916 386 1,281 1,301 948 1,542 Del Remedio 131 55 1,420 896 1,411 1,626 1,002 1,432 Fule Almeda 51 16 484 348 850 1,124 625 1,359 Lakeside 90 1,279 593 1,695 1,445 1,234 2,169 San Francisco 151 27 1,572 337 1,771 1,080 1,478 1,419 Sto. Angel 109 10 782 334 1,332 1,223 984 1,578 Total 636 165 7,290 3,301 9,655 9,189 7,190 11,191
12
Issues and Concerns • Activities/Strategies/Evaluation undertaken by the teachers were not congruent with the objectives • DLL are copied from DepEd Tambayan even names of School Heads from other Division • Follow-up of school heads/PSDSs/EPS’s on the results of post conferences/ agreements/ recommendations were not done all the time
14
With that thank you very much for listening and good morning once again to all of you.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.