Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Networks of ERK substrates.

Published byMona Svensson Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Networks of ERK substrates."— Presentation transcript:

1 Networks of ERK substrates.
Networks of ERK substrates. Identified substrates were overlaid on interaction network from the STRING database ( Only high‐confidence interaction from experiments or databases were extracted for rat and complemented with human data set. Orange and red circles represent substrates identified and validated in the study, respectively. Major subnetworks concern splicing, nuclear trafficking and nucleoproteins, MAPK signaling, cell junctions and membrane signaling. Binary interactions were removed. Candidate ERK1/2 substrates show a high degree of connectivity (34/155 are interconnected). Mathieu Courcelles et al. Mol Syst Biol 2013;9:669 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend

Download ppt "Networks of ERK substrates."

Similar presentations

Validating Cdk‐dependent chromatin association changes of selected outliers A–EValidation of changes in chromatin affinity following Cdk inhibition of.

Validating Cdk‐dependent chromatin association changes of selected outliers A–EValidation of changes in chromatin affinity following Cdk inhibition of.
Abundance of proteins matching selected subcellular locations and functions in CaCo‐2 cells. Abundance of proteins matching selected subcellular locations.

Abundance of proteins matching selected subcellular locations and functions in CaCo‐2 cells. Abundance of proteins matching selected subcellular locations.
Simulation of oxygen and substrate demands for ammonia detoxification.

Simulation of oxygen and substrate demands for ammonia detoxification.
Statistical analysis of the influence of network regulators on topology clusters in the oleate network. Statistical analysis of the influence of network.

Statistical analysis of the influence of network regulators on topology clusters in the oleate network. Statistical analysis of the influence of network.
A kinetic model reconciles observed ERK phosphorylation, localization, and activity responses A Schematic of a simple kinetic model including cytosolic.

A kinetic model reconciles observed ERK phosphorylation, localization, and activity responses A Schematic of a simple kinetic model including cytosolic.
Melting behavior of proteins identified in the Escherichia coli meltome and their properties Melting behavior of proteins identified in the Escherichia.

Melting behavior of proteins identified in the Escherichia coli meltome and their properties Melting behavior of proteins identified in the Escherichia.
Single‐molecule tracking in living cells.

Single‐molecule tracking in living cells.
Effects of ΔtolC on protein thermostability and abundance

Effects of ΔtolC on protein thermostability and abundance
(A) Graph depicting interaction between the five regulatory motifs measured by synergy and cooccurrence. (A) Graph depicting interaction between the five.

(A) Graph depicting interaction between the five regulatory motifs measured by synergy and cooccurrence. (A) Graph depicting interaction between the five.
CNA‐driven network of glioblastoma.

CNA‐driven network of glioblastoma.
Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile of the cognate transcription factor. Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile.

Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile of the cognate transcription factor. Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile.
Activity flow of the mTOR signaling network.

Activity flow of the mTOR signaling network.
The architecture of the TLR signaling network.

The architecture of the TLR signaling network.
Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions in oncogene‐signaling blocks for six representative cancer types. Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions.

Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions in oncogene‐signaling blocks for six representative cancer types. Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions.
Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic.

Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic.
Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.

Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.
Validation of the CCE associations by mass spectrometry.

Validation of the CCE associations by mass spectrometry.
(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.

(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.
The TBON model. The TBON model. (A) Representative confocal images of E14Tg2A cells stained for Tcf3 (green), Nanog (red), Oct4 (magenta), and total β‐catenin.

The TBON model. The TBON model. (A) Representative confocal images of E14Tg2A cells stained for Tcf3 (green), Nanog (red), Oct4 (magenta), and total β‐catenin.
Comparative analysis of RNA and protein profiles.

Comparative analysis of RNA and protein profiles.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google