Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΠαλλάς Ανδρεάδης Modified over 6 years ago
1
Microcirculatory effects of local and remote ischemic preconditioning in supraceliac aortic clamping
Nilon Erling, MD, Naomi Kondo Nakagawa, PhD, José Walber Miranda Costa Cruz, PhD, Fernando Luiz Zanoni, MVD, José Carlos Costa Baptista-Silva, MD, Paulina Sannomiya, PhD, Luiz Francisco Poli-de-Figueiredo, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Dissection of abdominal aorta: (A) Supraceliac aortic control, for (B) tourniquet formation, and (C) infrarenal aortic control, for (D) tourniquet formation. E, During the experiment, the animal was placed on a heated platform. F, Illustration shows the final aspect of surgical preparation with the abdominal wall closed and Rumel tourniquets brought out of the wound to allow aortic occlusion and release without mesentery exposure. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 A, Experimental protocol and (B) main arterial pressure variations during the experiment in control, ischemia and reperfusion (IR), local ischemic preconditioning (LIPC), and remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) groups. Data expressed as mean ± standard error for 14 animals per group. *P < .001: IR, LIPC, and RIPC vs control. †P < .001: LIPC vs control. ‡P < .05: RIPC vs control. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Representative intravital photomicrographs of mesenteric postcapillary venules (original magnification ×100) from (A) control, (B) ischemia and reperfusion (I/R), (C) local ischemic preconditioning (LIPC), and (D) remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) groups. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
5
Fig 4 Representative photomicrographs of E-selectin immunofluorescence (original magnification ×1000) from (A) control, (B) ischemia and reperfusion (I/R), (C) local ischemic preconditioning (LIPC), and (D) remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) groups. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
6
Fig 5 Mesenteric leukocyte-endothelium interaction. A, Number of rolling leukocytes, (B) velocity of rolling leukocytes, (C) number of adherent leukocytes, and (D) number of migrated leukocytes in control, ischemia and reperfusion (IR), local ischemic preconditioning (LIPC), and remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) groups. Data expressed as mean ± standard error for seven animals per group. *P < .05 vs control. †P < .05 vs IR. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
7
Fig 6 Expression of adhesion molecules (A) P-selectin, (B) E-selectin, and (C) intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) in mesenteric endothelium in control, ischemia and reperfusion (IR), local ischemic reperfusion (LIPC), and remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) groups. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error for seven animals per group. *P < .02 vs control. †P < .005 vs IR. §P < .03 vs LIPC. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.