1. IEEE 802.11 TGaf DRAFT Meeting Plan and Agenda
April 2009
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
July 2013
IEEE TGaf DRAFT Meeting Plan and Agenda
Date:
Authors:
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

2. April 2009
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
July 2013
Abstract
This presentation is the agenda and meeting plan for the meeting of IEEE TGaf taking place the week of July 15th, 2013 at the IEEE 802 Plenary in Geneva.
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

3. Plan for the Week [MAM1 (ad hoc)+PM2, TAM1]
July 2013
Plan for the Week [MAM1 (ad hoc)+PM2, TAM1]
Approve meeting and teleconference minutes
Regulatory update
Review the results of LB196
Review of the progress since May
Editorial review; spreadsheet 11-12/1017r48
Review and Approve all comment resolution submissions
Request a recirculation of draft 5.0 (unchanged) and request conditional approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
Submit the PAR extension request
Plan for September meeting and teleconferences
Task Group Officers
Chair: Rich Kennedy (BlackBerry)
Vice-chair and Editor: Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
Vice-chair and Recording Secretary: Zhou Lan (NICT)
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

4. Room Assignments MAM1 (ad hoc) – 18 MPM2 – 18 TAM1 – 18 July 2013
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

5. Monday AM1 (ad hoc) Meeting call to order
July 2013
Monday AM1 (ad hoc)
Meeting call to order
Modify and approve the agenda
Administrative items including IEEE IP statement
Review the results of LB 196
Review progress since May and editorial review
Discuss final comment resolutions
Plan for the week
Recess
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

6. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
July 2013
Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy.
Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2]:
“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
“Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims
“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged
No duty to perform a patent search
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

7. Patent Related Links - Updated
July 2013
Patent Related Links - Updated
All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.
Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
The current version of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws is available at: 
(HTML version) 
(PDF version) 
The current version of the IEEE-SA Standards Board OM is available at: 
(HTML version) 
(PDF version) 
The text of the changes (approved by SASB/BOG in 2012) can be found at: 
Material about the patent policy is available at
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

8. Call for Potentially Essential Patents
July 2013
Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:
Either speak up now or
Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or
Cause an LOA to be submitted
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

9. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
July 2013
Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.
Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.
Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.
Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.
Technical considerations remain primary focus
Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.
Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.
Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.
See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.
Slide #4
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

10. Other Documents and WebPages to Review
July 2013
Other Documents and WebPages to Review
Please review the documents at the following links: -  IEEE Patent Policy -  -  Patent FAQ -  -  LoA Form -  -  Affiliation FAQ -
-  Anti-Trust FAQ -  -  Ethics -  -  IEEE Working Group OM -
802 WG P&P:
802 LMSC P&P:
802 LMSC OM:
WG Style Guide  09/1034r7:
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

11. March 2010
doc.: IEEE /0265r1
July 2013
Meeting Etiquette
IEEE 802 is a world-wide professional technical organization
Meetings are to be conducted in an orderly and professional manner in accordance with the policies and procedures governed by the organization.
Individuals are to address the “Technical” content of the subject under consideration and refrain from making “personal” comments to or about the presenter.
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry
Stephen McCann, RIM

12. Task Group Chair’s Functions
July 2013
Task Group Chair’s Functions
[From Policies and Procedures of IEEE Project ™, subclause 3.7.3]
The TG Chair may decide non-technical issues or may put them to a vote of the TG. The TG participants and the Chair decide technical issues by vote. The TG Chair decides what is non-technical and what is technical.
The TG Chair is responsible for presiding over TG sessions.
The TG Chair shall operate the TG in an unbiased fashion. To maintain impartiality, the TG Chair shall refrain from taking sides in debate on technical motions.
It is the responsibility of the TG Chair to lead the TG in producing a quality draft standard in a timely fashion as specified by the specific PAR
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

13. Task Group Chair's Authority
July 2013
Task Group Chair's Authority
[From Policies and Procedures of IEEE Project ™, subclause 3.7.4]
To carry out the responsibilities cited in subclause 3.7.3*, the TG Chair has authority to:
Decide which issues are technical and which are non-technical.
Assign and unassign subtasks and task leaders or executors, e.g. secretary, subgroup leader, etc.
Speak for the TG to the WG.
Determine if an organization or consortium is dominating the TG, and, if so, raise the issue to the WG Chair.
Be representative of the TG during coordination and interaction with IEEE® staff.
* See slide 11
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

14. July 2013
PAR Scope and Purpose
Approved PAR Scope: An amendment that defines modifications to both the physical layers (PHY) and the Medium Access Control Layer (MAC), to meet the legal requirements for channel access and coexistence in the TV White Space
Approved PAR Purpose: The purpose of this amendment is to allow wireless networks to be used in the TV white space
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

15. July 2013
Purpose, Principles and Vision/Outcome “If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else.”*
cbp-and-david-allens-methods
Purpose: the Task Group should create an amendment whose implementation in solutions is likely to receive Regulatory approval for operation in the TV White Spaces under the applicable regulatory rules in the different regulatory domains.
Principles:
The amendment should not duplicate functionality that is being standardized in other Task Groups.
There is no need for backwards compatibility with 2.45 GHz ISM operation.
The PHY is based on Clause 23, representing modifications of and references to Clause 22, and required, related changes to Clauses 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, and Annexes B, C, D and E
Vision/Outcome: Use PHYs to specify the basis for a system that the regulators can approve for operation in the TVWS bands.
* Yogi Berra
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

16. July 2013
Comment Resolution
REMINDER: The aim of comment resolution is to turn NO votes to YES votes
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

17. July 2013
Introduction
WELCOME to the twenty-second face-to-face meeting of IEEE TGaf!
On Friday, November 20, 2009 the IEEE TGaf was approved by the EC (10/1/4) with this motion:
On December 8th NesCom approved the formation of the Task Group for P802.11af
LB171 started on 1/24/11 and ran for 30 days, ending at 23:59:59 ET on February 24th.
The 1st letter ballot failed with 62% approval and 1302 comments
The 2nd letter ballot passed with 79.1% approval and 998 comments
The 3rd letter ballot passed with 86.6% approval and 166 comments
The 4th letter ballot passed with 91.7% approval and 86 comments
The 5th letter ballot passed with 93.9% approval and 12 non-MBS comments
Our task is to recirculate a clean draft ask the EC for conditional approval to start the Sponsor Ballot process
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

18. Progress Since May & Editorial Review
July 2013
Progress Since May & Editorial Review
Comment resolution spreadsheet in:
Review and approve the Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
11-13/0726r0
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

19. Monday PM2 Meeting call to order Modify and approve the agenda
July 2013
Monday PM2
Meeting call to order
Modify and approve the agenda
Administrative items including IEEE IP statement
Approve meeting and teleconference minutes
Review and approve the comment resolution spreadsheet: 11-12/1017r49
Review the results of LB 196
Review progress since May and editorial review
Plan for the week
Approve comment resolutions
Review and approve the Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
Recess
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

20. Meeting and Teleconference Minutes
July 2013
Meeting and Teleconference Minutes
Posted Minutes
Waikoloa Interim: (posted 10-Jul :37:48)
June 18th Teleconference: (posted 18-Jun :10:25)
July 9th Teleconference: (posted 10-Jul :00:18)
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

21. Motion #1 Motion: Moved by: Al Seconded by: Dongguk
July 2013
Motion #1
Motion:
To approve the TGaf minutes from the May Wireless Interim in Waikoloa, and June 18th and July 9th teleconferences in documents 11-13/0620r0, 11-13/0687r0 and 11-13/0739r0 respectively.
Moved by: Al
Seconded by: Dongguk
Discussion on the motion?
Vote: Unanimous consent
The motion passes.
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

22. July 2013
LB196 Results
300 eligible people are in this ballot group.     215 affirmative votes    14 negative votes  
    1 negative vote without comments
    8 abstention votes
===   238  votes received  =  79.3% valid returns                                      =    3.4% valid abstentions
This ballot has met the 50% returned ballot requirement
This ballot has met the less than 30% abstention requirement
  APPROVAL RATE: 215  affirmative votes       =      93.9 % affirmative   14  valid negative votes  =        6.1 % negative
The 75% affirmation requirement has been met,
Motion Passes.
There were 12 comments received.  
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

23. Comment Breakdown July 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry Count
Must Be Satisfied1
Category
0 Total
Grand Total
Name
Editorial
General
Technical
Mitsuru Iwaoka 2 6 8
Yusuke Asai 3
Shusaku Shimada 1 9 12
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

24. July 2013
Motion #2
Motion
To approve the comment resolutions in document 11-13/0853r1.
Moved by: Dongguk
Seconded by: Al
Discussion on the motion?
Vote: 7 Y 0 N 0 A
The motion passes.
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

25. July 2013
Motion #3
Motion
To approve the comment resolutions in spreadsheet in 11-12/1017r49 Editorial Tab #7.
Moved by: Peter
Seconded by: Al
Discussion on the motion?
Vote: 7 Y 0 N 0 A
Motion passes.
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

26. July 2013
Motion #4
Motion
To approve the comment resolution spreadsheet in 11-12/1017r50 as the working document.
Moved by: Peter
Seconded by: Al
Discussion on the motion?
Vote: 7 Y 0 N 0 A
The motion passes.
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

27. Motion #5 Motion Moved by: Al Seconded by: Zhou
July 2013
Motion #5
Motion
To approve “P802.11af Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot” in document 11-13/726r0.
Moved by: Al
Seconded by: Zhou
Discussion on the motion?
Vote: Y N 0 A
The motion passes.
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

28. Tuesday AM1 Agenda Meeting call to order Modify and approve the agenda
July 2013
Tuesday AM1 Agenda
Meeting call to order
Modify and approve the agenda
Administrative items
Reminder and Call for essential patents
Complete the work for the week
Adjourn
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

29. July 2013
Motion #4
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB196 on TGaf D5.0, as contained in document 11-12/1017r50
Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot, asking the question “Should P802.11af D5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
Moved: Al
Seconded: Peter
Discussion?
Result: 5 Y 0 N 0 A The motion passes.
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

30. July 2013
Motion #15 from May
Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the document referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines,
Move to forward the TVWS PAR information from 11-09/934r8 to NesCom for a approval of a 1-year extension of the PAR.
Moved by: Peter
Seconded by: Yongho
Discussion?
Vote: 7 Y 0 N 0 A
The motion passes.
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

31. Brief Regulatory Updates
July 2013
Brief Regulatory Updates
Ofcom TVWS trials
ETSI BRAN EN v1.0.0 out for comment
Japan
Korea
Other
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

32. WG Motion #1 In the TG: July 2013
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB196 on TGaf D5.0, as contained in document 11-12/1017r50
Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot, asking the question “Should P802.11af D5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
Moved:
Seconded:
Discussion?
Result: 116, 0, 2
In the TG:
Moved by: Al Petrick; Seconded by Peter Ecclesine
Result: 5-0-0
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

33. July 2013
WG Motion #2
Approve document 11-13/726r0 as the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee on the requirements for conditional approval to forward P802.11af to Sponsor Ballot, and
Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee to conditionally approve forwarding P802.11af to sponsor ballot.
Moved by Rich Kennedy on behalf of TGaf
Vote: 107, 0, 1
In the TG:
Moved: Al Petrick, Seconded: Zhou Lan
Result:
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

34. Plan for September (Nanjing)
July 2013
Plan for September (Nanjing)
Approve Geneva and Teleconference minutes
Review results of Letter Ballot 197 on Draft 5.0
Review results of the first Sponsor Ballot
Plan for November, additional ballots and Teleconferences
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

35. Teleconferences Weekly on Tuesdays through
July 2013
Teleconferences
Weekly on Tuesdays through
Time: 21:00 ET for up to 2 hours
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

36. TGaf Timeline – Changed May 2013
January 2010
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
July 2013
TGaf Timeline – Changed May 2013
Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: January 2011
Second Working Group Letter Ballot: July 2012
Recirculation Letter Ballot: January 2013
Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: July 2013
Initial Sponsor Ballot: September 2013
Recirculate Sponsor Ballot: November 2013
Final WG/EC Approval: March 2014
RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June 2014
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry
Michael Montemurro, RIM

37. Motion #16 Motion to adjourn Moved by: Zhou July 2013
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

38. Process of Getting to Letter Ballot and Beyond
May 2007
doc.: IEEE /0679r2
July 2013
Process of Getting to Letter Ballot and Beyond
Completed Steps | Future Steps
Adoption of PAR and 5 Criteria
Technical Presentations and Discussions
Specify Any Additional Requirements, Comparison Criteria, or Other Documents
Call For Proposals
Presentation of Proposals
Select from Submitted Complete Proposals to Produce a Draft
Refine Draft
(Second) Letter Ballot – July 2012
Recirculation – January 2013
Sponsor Ballot –
Recirculation –
Final WG/EC Approval –
IEEE SB REVCOM Approval –
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry
Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

39. 3 Cycles of Comments and Resolution
July 2013
3 Cycles of Comments and Resolution
Call for Informal Comments
Comment Resolution
WG Letter Ballot
Comment Resolution, Recirculation
Sponsor Ballot
Comment Resolution, Recirculation
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry

40. References Go to https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents
July 2013
References
Go to
In the box labeled “All Groups”, pull down the menu and select “TGaf”
Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry