1. Skin Protection by Sunscreens Is Improved by Explicit Labeling and Providing Free Sunscreen 
Isabelle Nicol, Caroline Gaudy, Joanny Gouvernet, Marie A. Richard, Jean J. Grob 
Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
DOI: /sj.jid
Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Influence of the label on the SC choice. SC, sunscreens; SPF, sun protection factor; TI, tanning-indifferent; TS, tan-seekers; SS, sun-sensitive individual; and SR: sun-resistant individual. Comparative distribution of SC choice in the two arms with SCs at disposal: FNL vs FS. The distribution is expressed in % of days (with at least 2hours exposure) during which an SC type was chosen by FS and FNL groups. The distribution is presented in four sub-populations defined on the basis on their interest for tanning, that is, TS or TI, and subjective sun-sensitivity, that is, those who consider themselves as SS or SR individuals.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , 41-48DOI: ( /sj.jid )
Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Explicit labeling of the SC bottles used in group FNL. See translation in text.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , 41-48DOI: ( /sj.jid )
Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Flow Chart: Setting, selection of population, and randomization. SC, sunscreen; interventions include FS (=4 types of SCs bottles with their usual SPF label at disposal); FNL (=free SCs with the new visual labeling also at disposal); and NI (=no intervention).
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , 41-48DOI: ( /sj.jid )
Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4 Silhouettes used in the daily sun exposure questionnaire.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , 41-48DOI: ( /sj.jid )
Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions