Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLeif Eklund Modified over 5 years ago
1
ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.6) Existing ATF Extraction Line
Coupling Correction / Emittance Diagnostics FONT nBPM (KEK) nBPM (SLAC) Compton / laserwire Existing ATF Extraction Line ODR Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
2
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
3
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Version 3.6 Changes Andrei’s latest FF optics with reduced U3224 EXT skew quadrupoles for vertical dispersion correction octupoles will be removed Cherrill’s latest designs for FF magnets (coming soon) and other things that come out of this meeting … Tracking Results Program σy*(rms) σy*(sig) εy Δεy nm nm nm % MAD ELEGANT TURTLE DIMAD LUCRETIA SAD Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
4
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
K2 BH3 BH2 6.0 m BH1 septa K1 BH1,2 (SHI “H”) strengths same as existing EXT BH3 (SHI “C”) has 110% of present strength Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
5
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
K1(+) K2(+) possible location for 1 μm laserwire σy = 1.4 μm Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
6
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
EXT Diagnostic Section (v3.6) SQ SQ SQ SQ WS WS WS WS WS 0.5 2.7 1.25 1.25 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.25 2.2 1.25 3.8 3.8 3.8 – x – y 90° 180° 90° 90° 11° 17° 28° 42° 28° σ (μm) 80.6 10.0 154.6 6.8 86.3 12.1 152.3 6.8 87.4 11.7 shield wall 8 < σx/σy < 23 Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
7
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
8
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
9
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
10
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
2nd order dispersion Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
11
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
chromaticity (EXT) Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
12
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
beam size (μm) Parameters energy = 1.3 GeV γεx = 5×10-6 m εx = 2×10-9 m γεy = 3×10-8 m εy = 1×10-11 m σz = 8 mm σδ = 0.08 % βx* = 4 mm βy* = 0.1 mm σx* = μm σy* = 34 nm Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
13
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
TABLE 1: existing ATF EXT quadrupoles power supply maximum currents from N. Terunuma (April 22, 2005) a note on names: the "quad name" column names the location in the beam line; the "magnet name" column names the physical magnet that presently resides at each location; the "power supply" column names the power supply whose cables come to that location quad magnet magnet power Imax KLmax notes name name type supply p.s. @ 1.3 GeV QD1X QD1Xmag Hitachi 2 QD1Xps QD2X QD2Xmag Hitachi 2 QD2Xps QF1X QF1Xmag Hitachi 2 QF1Xps QK0X QK0Xmag ECUBE skew QK0Xps e-4 QS1X QS1Xmag ECUBE skew QS1Xps e-4 QF2X QF2Xmag Hitachi 1 QF2Xps QD3X QD3Xmag Hitachi 5 QD3Xps QF3X QF3Xmag Hitachi 5 QF3Xps QF4X QF4Xmag Hitachi 5 QF4Xps QS2X QS2Xmag ECUBE skew QS2Xps e-4 QD4X QD4Xmag Hitachi 5 QD4Xps use Imax = 100 amps QD5X QD5Xmag Hitachi 5 QD5Xps BH4X QF5X QF5Xmag Hitachi 5 QF5Xps QK1X QK1Xmag IDX skew QK1Xps e-2 QD6X QD6Xmag Tokin QD6Xps QK2X QK2Xmag IDX skew QK2Xps e-2 QD7X QD7Xmag Hitachi 5 QD7Xps QK3X QK3Xmag IDX skew QK3Xps e-2 QF6X QF6Xmag Hitachi 5 QF6Xps QK4X QK4Xmag IDX skew QK4Xps e-2 QD8X QD8Xmag Hitachi 4 QD8Xps QF7X QF7Xmag Hitachi 4 QF7Xps QD9X QD9Xmag Hitachi in series with QD8X magnetic measurements data file Imax ATF$MAG:MAG_KI_Q_HITACHI_1.FOR ATF$MAG:MAG_KI_Q_HITACHI_2.FOR ATF$MAG:MAG_KI_Q_HITACHI_4.FOR ATF$MAG:MAG_KI_Q_HITACHI_5.FOR ATF$MAG:MAG_KI_Q_TOKIN_3393.FOR ATF$MAG:MAG_KI_Q_IDX_SKEW.FOR ATF$MAG:MAG_KI_Q_ECUBE_SKEW Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
14
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
TABLE 2: ATF2 EXT quadrupoles and sextupoles (“version 3.6") name magnet magnet power Imax KLmax KL NOTEs name type supply p.s. SF1X S FFTB sextupole QF1X QD3Xmag Hitachi 5 QD3Xps QS1X e new magnet? QD2X QF3Xmag Hitachi 5 QF3Xps SD2X S FFTB sextupole QF3X QF4Xmag Hitachi 5 QF4Xps QF4X QD4Xmag Hitachi 5 QD4Xps SD3X S FFTB sextupole QD5X QD5Xmag Hitachi 5 QD5Xps QS2X e new magnet? QF6X QF5Xmag Hitachi 5 QF5Xps SF4X S FFTB sextupole QF7X QD1Xmag Hitachi 2 QD1Xps QD8X QD7Xmag Hitachi 5 QD7Xps QF9X QF6Xmag Hitachi 5 QF6Xps QK1X QD6Xmag Tokin QD6Xps convert old QD6X? QD10X IHEP QF11X IHEP QK2X QK2Xmag IDX skew QK2Xps e QD12X IHEP QF13X QD8Xmag Hitachi 4 QD8Xps QD14X QF7Xmag Hitachi 4 QF7Xps QF15X QD9Xmag Hitachi in series with QF13X QK3X QK3Xmag IDX skew QK3Xps e QD16X IHEP QF17X IHEP QK4X QK4Xmag IDX skew QK4Xps e QD18X IHEP QF19X IHEP QD20X QD2Xmag Hitachi 2 QD2Xps QF21X QF1Xmag Hitachi 2 QF1Xps note: QF2X (Hitachi 1) and one IHEP quadrupole are left over Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
15
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Version 3.6 Issues BH3 (Sumitomo Heavy Industries type “C”) … can it run at 110% of it’s present strength? need to get another FFTB “1.38S3.00” sextupole from SLAC for EXT cavity BPMs on EXT quads with no movers (QD18X, QF19X, QD20X, QF21X)? kicker cables (kickers are 8.2 m / 35 ns further apart) compact laserwire package design (laserwire chamber + wire scanner + BPM(s)) where to put: KEK BPM triplet, nanoBPM, FONT4, ODR, … ? MAD deck for FF is still sketchy … need to put in BPMs, movers, etc. need to do more misalignment/correction and performance simulations (including realistic wire scanner resolutions, extraction channel errors, … ) Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
16
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Version 3.6 Deck Issues differences between MAD and SAD “split bend disease” SURVEY (layout) differences … which coordinates to use for initial magnet alignment? (differences at the few hundred micrometer level … ) earth’s curvature following or laser straight? (vertical difference is same order as alignment tolerances) differences in tracking results (probably not significant) different decks (or LINE definitions) for different purposes? (i.e. a special SURVEY deck, a special tracking deck, … ) other issues? Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
17
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Mark Woodley, SLAC 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.