Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc) estimated for each of 23 cohorts by MasterBayes ... Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PD<sub>c</sub>)

Published byAri Sugiarto Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc) estimated for each of 23 cohorts by MasterBayes ... Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PD<sub>c</sub>)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc) estimated for each of 23 cohorts by MasterBayes ... Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PD<sub>c</sub>) estimated for each of 23 cohorts by MasterBayes (Hadfield et al. 2006) during pedigree reconstruction. Lines represent 95% credible intervals. Numbers above points represent the number of cubs assigned parentage in each year. Bottom: Total population size and number of males and females estimated in program MARK for each year of the study, based on 20 core social groups with consistent capture records. Bars represent standard errors. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 14 January 2019, Pages 301–312, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 2 Estimated intraclass correlations (i. e
Figure 2 Estimated intraclass correlations (i.e., proportion of total phenotypic variance calculated by dividing each ... Figure 2 Estimated intraclass correlations (i.e., proportion of total phenotypic variance calculated by dividing each component by the sum of all variance components) for each random effect in models of PD<sub>i</sub> and EGP<sub>i</sub>. Bars represent standard errors. M and P denote maternal and paternal individuals, while MSG and PSG denote the corresponding maternal and paternal social groups. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 14 January 2019, Pages 301–312, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3 Spatial representation of (a) maternal and (b) paternal social group effects and (c) the relationship between ... Figure 3 Spatial representation of (a) maternal and (b) paternal social group effects and (c) the relationship between them. Effects are predicted from the mixed model of log-transformed PD<sub>i</sub> (see main text) using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) while the spatial configuration of social group territories illustrated is derived from a bait-marking survey in 1993 (when the maximum number of social groups were present). Six social groups included in current analyses are not shown on panels (a) or (b) due to missing bait-marking data, while grey shaded territories correspond to groups with no parentage assigned. Error bars in panel (c) denote ± standard error and the regression line (red) slope is calculated directly from the model (co)variance estimates as COV<sub>MSG.PSG</sub>/V<sub>MSG.</sub> MSG and PSG denote maternal and paternal social groups. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 14 January 2019, Pages 301–312, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Download ppt "Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc) estimated for each of 23 cohorts by MasterBayes ... Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PD<sub>c</sub>)"

Similar presentations

J Exp Bot. 2017;68(17): doi: /jxb/erx352

J Exp Bot. 2017;68(17): doi: /jxb/erx352
Notes: Household survey-based Gini and p90/p10 measures use the same definitions as employed by the UK’s official income distribution statistics (source:

Notes: Household survey-based Gini and p90/p10 measures use the same definitions as employed by the UK’s official income distribution statistics (source:
Figure 4 Change in plaque burden, plaque area, and plaque composition according to wall shear stress. (A and B) Change ... Figure 4 Change in plaque burden,

Figure 4 Change in plaque burden, plaque area, and plaque composition according to wall shear stress. (A and B) Change ... Figure 4 Change in plaque burden,
Figure 1. Overview of the workflow of NetworkAnalyst 3.0.

Figure 1. Overview of the workflow of NetworkAnalyst 3.0.
Figure 1 The study area within Vienna Zoo is outlined in red

Figure 1 The study area within Vienna Zoo is outlined in red
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Study area in Northern Wisconsin, USA, where we simulated the dispersal of 15 translocated American martens ... Figure 1 Study area in Northern.

Figure 1 Study area in Northern Wisconsin, USA, where we simulated the dispersal of 15 translocated American martens ... Figure 1 Study area in Northern.
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
FIGURE 1 Histological diagnoses divided into 8-year time frames (n = 1208). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

FIGURE 1 Histological diagnoses divided into 8-year time frames (n = 1208). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
FIGURE 1 The effect of daprodustat on hemoglobin (Hgb) levels

FIGURE 1 The effect of daprodustat on hemoglobin (Hgb) levels
Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.

Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.
FIGURE 2 Responses to the question: regarding vasoactive drugs, does your centre use the following frequently, rarely ... FIGURE 2 Responses to the question:

FIGURE 2 Responses to the question: regarding vasoactive drugs, does your centre use the following frequently, rarely ... FIGURE 2 Responses to the question:
FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary aldosterone; (B) plasma active renin; (C) urinary AGT concentrations; and (D) plasma AGT ... FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary.

FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary aldosterone; (B) plasma active renin; (C) urinary AGT concentrations; and (D) plasma AGT ... FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary.
Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.

Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.
Figure 1. The 12 species in this study and details of the improved G4-seq method. (A) Phylogenetic representation of ... Figure 1. The 12 species in this.

Figure 1. The 12 species in this study and details of the improved G4-seq method. (A) Phylogenetic representation of ... Figure 1. The 12 species in this.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA2020 ... Figure 1. Comparison of weighted.

Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA Figure 1. Comparison of weighted.
Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot of cumulative incidence of cancer onset following dermatomyositis diagnosis stratified ... Anti-TIF1-Ab: anti-transcriptional.

Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot of cumulative incidence of cancer onset following dermatomyositis diagnosis stratified ... Anti-TIF1-Ab: anti-transcriptional.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google