1. Contribution for the updating of the WFD reporting sheets and schemas
DG ENV
Jorge Rodríguez Romero

2. Background 2010 reporting exercise for first RBMP
Based on CIS reporting guidance nb 21
Success: all MS reported in WISE
Important effort for MS report and for COM to assess
Next reporting March 2016

3. Objective
Simplify as much as possible retaining the value for the purpose
Clarify reporting agreements where needed
Review contents where proved necessary
Maintain as much as possible back compatibility

4. Triggers for review
The contents are not fit for purpose (e.g. relevance, level of aggregation)
The contents are unclear or too complicated, not sufficiently straightforward to produce a clear report
The contents are relevant but the schemas are too complex
The contents are relevant but comparability is low
The contents are relevant but information has not been reported by most Member States

5. 5. The contents are relevant but information has not been reported
Some information may not be available (gaps in knowledge / implementation)
Pollutants loads
Groundwater dependent ecosystems
GWB for which there are directly dependant terrestrial ecosystems at country level
Country
Number BG 14 CY 1 EE 2 EL 25 ES 18 FR 54 HU 56 IE 72 IT
195 LT 20 LV 19 MT NL 21

6. 4. The contents are relevant but comparability is low
Rivers: Number and percentage of water bodies subject to each significant pressure
No Pressures
Point Source
Diffuse Source
Water Abstraction
Water flow regulations and morphological alterations
River management
Country Nb
(%) AT
2762
37,63 59
0,8
1202
16,38 40
0,55
4105
55,93 BE 82
46,33
177
100 12
6,78
139
78,53 BG
153
22,24
243
35,32
295
42,88
149
21,66 87
12,65 72
10,47 CY
102
47,22 43
19,91
104
48,15 38
17,59 7
3,24 CZ
5,52
485
45,37
559
52,29
704
65,86
229
21,42 DE
722
7,96
2629
28,97
6899
76,03
182
2,01
7744
85,34 EE
458
71,01 79
12,25
11,16 19
2,95 89
13,8 EL
693
67,09
13,46
300
29,04 62 6 1
0,1 ES
2273
52,91
1430
33,29
1114
25,93
761
17,71
817
19,02
479
11,15 FI
1090
68,04
132
8,24
418
26,09 3
0,19
125
7,8
180
11,24 FR
3686
34,05
3198
29,55
4226
39,04
2223
20,54
2798
25,85
3134
28,95 HU
4,95
20,37
261
30,03
10,24
516
59,38
808
92,98 IE
4213
92,27
353
7,73
210
4,6
343
7,51 IT
2953
38,63
2438
31,89
2973
38,89
1345
17,6
605
7,91
880
11,51 LT
374
46,06 63
7,76
223
27,46
0,12 28
3,45
195
24,01 LU LV 93 17
8,29 29
14,15 55
26,83 16 NL
1,18 99
38,98
225
88,58 33
12,99
174
68,5
230
90,55 PL
963 21
1804
39,34
135
2,94
660
14,39
2919
63,65 57
1,24 RO
3262 SE
0,02
199
1,28
15560
99,98 73
0,47
4561
29,31
4120
26,47 SK
1760 UK
1755
19,33
4076
44,89
6184
68,11
1307
4099
45,14
2680
29,52

7. 4. The contents are relevant but comparability is low
Cost of measures
Country
Measures Article113a
Measures Article113b1
Supplementary Measures
Total Aggregated Cost reported AT
€ ,00 BE
€ ,00
€ ,00 BG
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 CY
€ ,00 CZ
€ ,00 DE
€ ,00 EE
€ ,00 ES
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 FI
€ ,00 FR
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 HU
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 IE
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 IT
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 LU
€ ,00
€ ,00 LV
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 MT
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 NL
€ ,00
€ ,00 RO
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 SE
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00 SK
€ ,00
€ ,00 € UK
€ ,00
€ ,00
Total
€ ,00
€ ,00
€ ,00

8. 3. The contents are relevant but the schemas are too complex
POM schema * *

9. 2. The contents are unclear or too complicated

10. 2. The contents are unclear or too complicated
Lessons learnt article 8 reporting (monitoring programmes) – WGD meeting September 2009
Too flexible
Reporting of the same information in different ways led to double reporting – lack of consistency of the data
Different interpretations of what needs to be reported and how
Very difficult to interpret

11. 1. The contents are not fit for purpose
Inadequate level of aggregation
Exceedances of priority substances as groups of substances
Hydromorphological pressures and impacts
Lack of detail in the reporting of measures
Some of the definitions are unclear (e.g. the pressure classes)