Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJames Lynch Modified over 5 years ago
1
Market Participant Identity Process – migration to UNC
2
Governance Approach UNC Modification proposed to place the obligation on CDSP to maintain a register of Market Participant Identifies Potentially linked to Section V – Admission GT-D – CDSP and UK Link – potential to consider elements regarding process and publication A separate UNC Modification (not in the SCR) as the migration is planned in advance of REC v2.0 go live Will result in new DSC Service Lines to maintain processes and publication of Market Participant Identities CDSP will report to DSC Committees (noting that additional parties may be impacted beyond Core DSC parties) Change Management Committee – consider ‘technical’ impacts to existing participants systems and processes Contract Management Committee – to provide assurances surrounding process control Guidelines document to be managed via DSC Contract Management – predominantly relates to fact based checks against recognised datasets – e.g. Licensing / Companies House Consideration of non DSC party views
3
Guidance Document Guidance Document describes:
Verification Checks – against data sources Business Rules – against considerations for CDSP to assess Market Participant Applications Obligation to follow a predefined review cycle Approval – Group and Approach Appeals Proposed that the Guidance Document is managed within DSC Contract Management Committee – not a UNCC document
4
Process Consideration / Proposal
Proposed a greater reliance upon the ‘fact based checks’ (Verification Checks) Still proposing to maintain a ‘peer review’ to limit impacts to existing Participant systems Expected that the Business Rules should deal with valid reasons for rejection, therefore expected that this will be exceptional Period of review proposed for [5 working days] – may change as process matures Opportunity for CDSP to review representations discuss with provider and change proposer + publish representations and amended change proposal, if needed Approval at a Committee Challenge regarding timescales particularly in light of electricity Electricity timings aligned to industry meeting following the implementation of the implementation CP1271 ‘Align Market Domain Data Approval Timetable to SVG meetings’. Appeals / Escalation Go Live
5
Recommendation - Transition
Planned to formally transition mastering of MDD Market Participant Identities across to CDSP from February 2019 Includes DSC notice periods to allow for any changes to LWIs and systems Technical changes will be limited – publication source changed to Xoserve.com Maintain existing SPAA MP Id MDD format where possible Ofgem Programme is looking to source Market Participant data from UK Link from November 2019 Gas MDD will be from two sources from February 2020 until REC v2.0 implementation (2021) Proposed that the MDD publication timescales align Note, activities within the two timelines may differ so start point may be different This will rely upon DSC Committee creating a subgroup for MDD to correspond with the SPAA Change Board
6
Recommendation - Enduring
Expected that CSS will want to consume MP Id data from Electricity and Gas in the same format, and to the same timelines Electricity and Gas publication timetables to be aligned Implement a message (format and means is not currently defined) to notify MP Id population (and delta) as part of CSS Consequential changes to CSS Implement a file to notify MP Id population (and delta) as part of CSS Consequential changes to Market Participants
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.