Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IEEE /15 Regulatory SC Waikoloa Meeting Plan and Agenda

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IEEE /15 Regulatory SC Waikoloa Meeting Plan and Agenda"— Presentation transcript:

1 IEEE 802.11/15 Regulatory SC Waikoloa Meeting Plan and Agenda
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 May 2016 IEEE /15 Regulatory SC Waikoloa Meeting Plan and Agenda Date: Authors: Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

2 April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 May 2016 Abstract This presentation is the plan for the IEEE /15 Regulatory Standing Committee meeting at the Waikoloa IEEE 802 Wireless Interim the week of May 16, 2016. Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

3 Agenda [MPM1] Administrative items Introduction Approve Macau minutes
May 2016 Agenda [MPM1] Administrative items Introduction Approve Macau minutes Discussion items Regulatory work in progress IEEE 802 EC Regulatory changes Actions required Ofcom 5 GHz Consultation TBD AOB and Adjourn Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

4 Administrative Items Required notices IEEE Code of Ethics
May 2016 Administrative Items Required notices IEEE Code of Ethics IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Affiliation FAQ Antitrust and Competition Policy Letter of Assurance Form IEEE-SA Patent Committee FAQ & Patent slides and Chair and Secretary request Chair is Rich Kennedy (HPE) Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

5 SC Operating Rules Anybody can vote, present, and make motions
May 2012 doc.: IEEE /0675r0 May 2016 SC Operating Rules Anybody can vote, present, and make motions Participation in SC during and WG Plenary or Interim counts towards voting rights in the respective working group All motions must pass by a 75% majority Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)

6 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0512r0 May 2016 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise 6 Dorothy Stanley(Aruba)

7 Introduction Purpose Scope Critical Issue Focus May 2016
This group was formed in April of 2010 to improve the working relationship between the technical experts and the regulatory specialists, especially when it comes to critical technical issues Scope The group reviewed new regulatory changes or impending changes affecting and standards Each meeting will focus on the most critical issue at the time Critical Issue Focus Direct impact on IEEE and current and future standards Response/Input deadlines Coordination with IEEE (RR-TAG) Coordination with the Wi-Fi Alliance Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

8 Approve the Macau Minutes
May 2016 Approve the Macau Minutes Motion: To approve the minutes from the IEEE /15 Regulatory SC meeting at the Macau Plenary in document 11-16/0243r0 Posted: 18-Mar :57:55 ET Moved by: Peter Seconded by: Stuart Discussion? Vote: Unanimous consent Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

9 Regulatory Updates Ofcom 5 GHz Consultation
May 2016 Regulatory Updates Ofcom 5 GHz Consultation FCC meeting on sharing with ITS/DSRC in the 5.9 GHz band FCC Second R&O in 3.5 GHz NTIA RFC on IoT 600 MHz band reverse auction begun on March 29, 2016 ETSI BRAN update Dynamic Spectrum Alliance Global Summit Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

10 FCC DSRC Stakeholders Meeting
May 2016 FCC DSRC Stakeholders Meeting March 23rd at the FCC More than 50 people FCC OET NTIA USDOT Julie Knapp looking to start a 3-phase test program to show efficacy of sharing protocols Phase 1: FCC lab testing of samples Phase 2: Limited field testing Phase 3: Rigorous field testing Document “soon” Could be NOI, PN or FNPRM Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

11 FCC 16-55 Second R&O in GN Docket 12-354
May 2016 FCC 16-55 Second R&O in GN Docket Finalizes the framework for the Citizens Broadband Radio Service Also resolves the three outstanding issues raised in the Second FNPRM Employs an engineering-based approach for determining when a Priority Access License area is in use Adopts a robust and flexible secondary market regime for Priority Access Licenses Balances the expanded access for wireless broadband operators with the need to protect fixed satellite service operations, and adopts protections that will be tailored to the characteristics of each grandfathered earth station Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

12 NTIA RFC: IoT Examples of spectrum related questions:
Examples of spectrum related questions: What technological issues may hinder the development of IoT, if any? a. Examples of possible technical issues could include: i. Interoperability ii. Insufficient/contradictory/proprietary standards/platforms iii. Spectrum availability and potential congestion/interference iv. Availability of network infrastructure v. Other b. What can the government do, if anything, to help mitigate these technical issues? What factors should the Department of Commerce and, more generally, the federal government consider when prioritizing their technical activities with regard to IoT and its applications, and why?

13 ETSI in Process EN 300 328 in ENAP
May 2016 ETSI in Process EN in ENAP EN still resolving issues; trying to complete in June; now December EN (TVWS) in limbo – no rapporteur or pressure to get it done Technical Reports on 5 GHz band sharing TR EESS in the MHz to MHz band TR Radiolocation Systems in the MHz to MHz and MHz to MHz bands TR Road Tolling and Intelligent Transport systems in the MHz to MHz band Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

14 DSA Global Summit April 26th Regulator Workshop
May 2016 DSA Global Summit April 26th Regulator Workshop Update on unlicensed spectrum access Path to affordable Internet access April 27th – 28th Summit 6 Keynote addresses 7 Panel discussions 18 Regulators in attendance Emphasis on connecting the unconnected Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

15 DSA Global Summit: Keynotes
May 2016 DSA Global Summit: Keynotes Prof. H Nwana, Executive Director, Dynamic Spectrum Alliance [ Download Now ] Mr. Orlando Ayala, Chairman and Corporate Vice President of Emerging Businesses, Microsoft Corporation [ English ] Dr. Martha Liliana Suárez Peñaloza, Director, Agencia Nacional del Espectro (ANE), Colombia David Luna Sánchez, Minister of Information and Communications Technology (Colombia) [ Download Now ] Mr. Haiyun Tang, Chief Executive Officer, Adaptrum Inc. [ Download Now ] Mr. Mario Maniewicz, Deputy Director, Radiocommunications Bureau, International Telecommunications Union (ITU) [ Download Now] Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

16 DSA Global Summit: Panels
May 2016 DSA Global Summit: Panels Challenges to Universal and Affordable Connectivity in Latin America and Beyond: Implications for Policymakers, Businesses, and Civil Society Country Viewpoints on the Analogue to Digital Switch-Over: 4G Spectrum Awards, Opportunities for Dynamic Spectrum Access, and the Future of Digital Broadcasting New Developments in Spectrum Sharing: Unlicensed Allocations, Unlicensed Managed Access, Exclusive Use and Non-Exclusive Licensing, New Wi-Fi and LTE Technologies and Standards, Databases, Sensing, and More The Next Opportunities for Dynamic Spectrum Access and Connectivity: 2.3GHz, 3.5GHz, 5GHz, and Above Innovative Use Cases for Dynamic Spectrum Access Technologies: Transportation, Rural Broadband, Public and Food Safety, Agriculture, Education, Healthcare, Network Resilience and Disaster Recovery, Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement, Humanitarian Aid, Smart Cities, and More A Discussion with the Regulators: Regulatory Best Practices for Greater Spectrum Utilization from Across the Globe Driving the Ecosystem: Smart Financing, and Next Steps to Achieve Global Connectivity Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

17 Billions of People on Earth Affordable Monthly Communications Spend
May 2016 Access Affordability Billions of People on Earth Average Annual Income Affordable Monthly Communications Spend 1st $49,206 $205 2nd $12,722 $53 3rd $5,540 $23 4th $2,987 $12 5th $1,771 $7 6th $1,065 $4.40 7th $540 $2.25 Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

18 Ofcom 5 GHz Consultation
May 2016 Ofcom 5 GHz Consultation Opening more of the 5 GHz band Short term MHz Medium term changes Long term MHz Deadline for comments: July 22, 2016 Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

19 May 2016 Consultation Goals This consultation sets out our proposals for increasing the amount of radio spectrum available for Wi-Fi in the 5 GHz band to deliver high speed wireless broadband for consumers. Wi-Fi is one of the UK’s most important vehicles for communications, commerce and entertainment. 85% of the UK’s 27 million households have a broadband connection. Virtually all of these households use Wi-Fi to provide the final link between their home broadband router and the various wireless devices in their homes. We have a specific short-term focus on the MHz band… Re-examining the technical requirements for Wi-Fi Removing outdoor restrictions on Wi-Fi access to the MHz range Retaining the longer term objective of opening up spectrum if possible at MHz and MHz Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

20 Consultation Questions 1-4
May 2016 Consultation Questions 1-4 Question 1: Do you agree with our proposal to prioritise consideration of the MHz frequencies for Wi-Fi, subject to appropriate protections to other users, in particular satellite services? Question 2: Do you agree with our proposal to re-examine the requirement for DFS across the 5 GHz band, subject to appropriate protections to other users? Question 3: Do you think we should pursue the other options we have identified: opening up MHz; outdoor Wi-Fi use at MHz; and opening up the ‘centre gap’ at ? Question 4: What are your views on the future growth in demand for Wi-Fi? In which use scenarios do you expect to see the greatest pressure for delivery of high quality Wi-Fi access? What evidence do you have to support your views? Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

21 Consultation Questions 5-8
May 2016 Consultation Questions 5-8 Question 5: Do you think technology improvements and densification of access points will be sufficient to meet demand or will there also be a need for more spectrum beyond that which we propose to make available? What evidence do you have to link between demand for data and demand for additional spectrum? Question 6: What real life speed and quality of experience can consumers expect in practice from devices using the 5GHz spectrum as authorised in the UK now? What changes can we expect as the number of devices increases and technology improves? What difference in speeds and quality of experience would additional spectrum make? Question 7: How important is contiguous spectrum? How wide should channels be to support future demand? Question 8: Do you believe we have correctly identified the incumbent services in MHz which need to be taken into account in considering opening up more 5 GHz spectrum for Wi-Fi? Are there any other services which will need to be taken into account in future studies? Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

22 Consultation Questions 9-10
May 2016 Consultation Questions 9-10 Question 9: What coexistence studies, measurement campaigns and mitigation techniques do you believe would be most effective for demonstrating coexistence between Wi-Fi and incumbent users? Question 10: Do you intend to participate and provide technical material into the ITU and CEPT work? In what way? We can also answer questions Ofcom has not asked Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

23 May 2016 Actions Required Using the new process, we will determine if there are items in need of action, to bring to the process How do we improve our interactions with Regulators? FCC, CITEL, CEPT, APT, ATU, ASMG, RCC How do we improve our interactions with ITU-R? We cannot do this alone; we must find common ground to work with others with similar issues We need a simple, clear and concise message Regulators want to find ways to more effectively utilize the spectrum; can we point out some of the basic errors in their data, such as outdated and inaccurate propagation models, clutter calculations, busy time, etc, and propose ways to restudy and update Other IEEE groups may have the similar band sharing issues with inaccurate propagation and building penetration models, e.g. ITU-R Recommendations P.452, P.528, P.619 Creating a position on mmWave spectrum Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise

24 May 2016 Teleconferences No more teleconferences; will take our weekly timeslot: Thursdays at 15:00pm ET for one hour. Rich Kennedy, HP Enterprise


Download ppt "IEEE /15 Regulatory SC Waikoloa Meeting Plan and Agenda"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google