1. 5/16/2017
Inspiring excellence!
We develop passionate, innovative, adaptable learners prepared to embrace the challenges of the future and make a positive difference in their community.
SIAC

2. Core Values
Student focus – We foster a passion for learning by developing the whole child.
Opportunity – Each person deserves to engage in experiences that help him or her grow and excel.
Collaboration – We embrace differences to work together productively.
Excellence - Higher expectations yield higher results for everyone.
Community – We create a sense of belonging through demonstration of respect, acceptance and pride.
Innovation – We seek new ways to make learning environments more exciting, challenging and rewarding.

3. Annual Student Achievement Goals
DRAFT
Annual Student Achievement Goals
Accelerate learning for all students
Reduce the gaps for IEP students
Increase 4-year graduation rate

4. Student Achievement Goal 1: Accelerate learning for all students
DRAFT
Student Achievement Goal 1: Accelerate learning for all students
Reading Comprehension
Increase the average NSS growth in Reading Comprehension for the “all students” group district-wide by 14 months growth on average
Math
Increase the average NSS growth in Mathematics for the “all students” group district-wide by 14 months growth on average
Science
Increase the average NSS growth in Science for the “all students” group district-wide by 14 months growth on average

5. DRAFT
Student Achievement 2: Reduce achievement gaps for IEP and SED students
Reading Comprehension
Increase the average NSS growth in Reading Comprehension for the “students with IEPs” and “socio-economically disadvantaged” groups district-wide by 15 months growth on average
Math
Increase the average NSS growth in Mathematics for the “students with IEPs” and “socio-economically disadvantaged” groups district-wide by 15 months growth on average
Science
Increase the average NSS growth in Science for the “students with IEPs” and “socio-economically disadvantaged” groups district-wide by 15 months growth on average

6. Two perspectives Proficiency Growth
Used for state and federal reporting
High Stakes
Growth
Used by LC to shape annual targets
More than a year of growth represents improvement greater than “typical” of a student depending upon where they scored the prior year

7. CCR Growth example On track for CCR: 231 - 5th 248 - 6th 265 - 7th
90th NPR (83+)
75th NPR (63-82)
50th NPR (38-62)
25th NPR (18-38)
10th NPR (1-17)
CCR Growth example
On track for CCR: th th th th th th th

8. Assumptions
To judge whether we made our growth goals, I adjusted the metric of the goals to reflect the typical growth within percentile bands for the student population tested
I used a factor of 1.2 to reflect 14 months and 1.3 to reflect 15 months growth.

9. Three groups Divide into three groups (Reading, Math, Science)
Summarize your content area results on chart paper
One overall observation
Three key ideas to celebrate
One item to investigate further

10. Other Reading data
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Overall % Proficient
77.3%
76.3%
77.0%
72.1%
71.1%
69.8%
67.6%
LCHS
84.5%
83.2%
85.5%
81.4%
81.5%
83.1%
82.5%
LCMS
71.4%
71.2%
72.7%
65.9%
65.1%
59.2%
57.4%
LCTH
73.5%
72.5%
68.8%
67.1%
67.8%
64.7%
Overall % Adv Prof
20.3%
19.5%
18.5%
18.0%
16.1%
10.5%
10.8%
16.7%
17.6%
17.4%
17.5%
13.1%
12.6%
10.7%
19.9%
18.8%
17.2%
16.0%
18.6%
10.4%
9.9%
24.3%
22.2%
21.2%
20.6%
16.5%
8.6%
10.0%

11. Other Math data
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Overall % Proficient
78.1%
76.0%
74.2%
73.5%
70.2%
69.4%
LCHS
82.6%
81.2%
81.8%
80.9%
80.3%
80.7%
LCMS
75.4%
72.9%
72.3%
72.1%
65.7%
61.6%
LCTH
76.3%
73.3%
74.1%
69.2%
70.4%
67.4%
67.1%
Overall % Adv Prof
19.5%
18.6%
17.9%
15.8%
14.8%
13.1%
11.4%
14.3%
14.7%
16.2%
11.7%
12.4%
12.1%
13.5%
20.0%
16.8%
15.3%
13.7%
14.1%
12.8%
9.7%
24.3%
24.7%
22.8%
22.3%
14.5%
11.3%

12. Other Science data
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Overall % Proficient
79.6%
78.5%
76.4%
77.6%
77.0%
74.9%
73.0%
LCHS
82.9%
83.1%
83.8%
81.8%
81.6%
83.7%
84.3%
LCMS
77.2%
71.9%
70.4%
75.0%
72.7%
69.5%
66.4%
LCTH
78.7%
80.2%
75.8%
76.9%
72.0%
69.6%
Overall % Adv Prof
17.4%
16.3%
15.6%
13.6%
12.8%
12.9%
12.4%
17.0%
17.5%
17.9%
14.8%
11.3%
16.1%
15.7%
13.0%
11.6%
9.5%
7.8%
8.8%
7.2%
8.3%
22.3%
19.8%
18.5%
18.4%
15.5%
13.7%

13. We will take a ten minute break.
Have a cookie!
We will take a ten minute break.

14. Three Different groups
Divide into three groups (LCHS, LCMS, LCTH)
Summarize your school’s growth results
One overall observation
Three key ideas to celebrate
One item to investigate further

15. These are current 17-18 grade levels
These are current grade levels. State and national averages are from prior year.

16. These are current 17-18 grade levels
These are current grade levels. State and national averages are from prior year.

17. These are current 17-18 grade levels
These are current grade levels. State and national averages are from prior year.

18. These are current 17-18 grade levels
These are current grade levels. State and national averages are from prior year.

19. Each segment represents a different cohort (not calculated using matched students). Dots indicate this year’s average NSS for geach grade. Dashed line represents the level of achievement required for proficiency.

20. Each segment represents a different cohort (not calculated using matched students). Dots indicate this year’s average NSS for geach grade. Dashed line represents the level of achievement required for proficiency.

21. Increase the 4-year cohort graduation rate to 94.0%
LC Official Graduation Rates:
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate: 93.36% (Statewide = 91.0%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate: 92.8% (Statewide = 91.3%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate: 92.0% (Statewide = 90.8%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate: 93.27% (Statewide = 90.5%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate:  92.42% (Statewide = 89.7%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate:  89.89% (Statewide = 89.26%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate:  83.65% (Statewide = 88.32%)

22. 5-Year Cohort Graduation (Data Used on the Iowa Report Card)
LC Official Graduation Rates:
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate: 94.07% (Statewide = 93.4%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate: 94.81% (Statewide = 93.3%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate: 95.7% (Statewide = 93.1%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate: 94.31% (Statewide = 92.3%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate:  93.72% (Statewide = 92.1%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate:  85.58% (Statewide = 91.4%)
Cohort ending year cohort graduation rate:  86.67% (Statewide = 91.80%)

23. Dropout Rates Dropout Year LCHS Number LCHS Rate (9-12) State (9-12)
2017 17
1.77%
2.8%
2016 22
2.26%
2015 10 1%
2.5%
2014 13
1.57%
2.7%
2013 11
1.18%
2012 23
2.53%
3.2%
2011 43
4.80%
3.4%
2010 54
5.60%
3.41%
2009 60
5.63%
3.15%
Dropout Rates:
*The dropout window for a school year begins on certified enrollment count day (October 1, 2013)
of that school year and ends on the day before certified enrollment count day the following year (September 30, 2014).

24. Growth How did we do on our Annual Achievement Goals?
Accelerate learning for all students (14 months)
Reduce the gaps for IEP and F/R students (15 months)
Increase 4-year graduation rate
Any other observations?

25. So… Accelerate learning for all students by 14 months.
Reading - We fell short of our goal of 14 months growth but exceeded one year of growth.
Math - We met our goal of 14 months growth.
Science - We met our goal of 14 months growth.
Accelerate learning for IEP and SED subgroups by 15 months.
Reading - We met our goal of 15 months growth for students with IEP and fell short of our goal for SED students but exceeded one year of growth.
Math - We met our goal of 15 months growth for students with IEP and met our goal for SED students.
Science - We met our goal of 15 months growth for students with IEPs but met our goal for SED students.
We fell short of our graduation rate goal of increasing the 4-year cohort rate to 94.0% but increased our percentage and are above the state average.
For the percentage of all students in the proficient categories, we increased in reading, increased in science and remained constant in math. We increased the percentage of all students in the advanced proficient categories in reading, math and science.

26. Thank you very much for your participation tonight!
See you next month!
(June 21st)
SIAC agendas and resources