1. July Plenary Closing Report
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
July Plenary Closing Report
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair
Apurva N. Mody < > as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
>
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

2. Outline IEEE 802.22 WG Agenda IEEE P802.22 – Progress Report
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Outline
IEEE WG Agenda
IEEE P – Progress Report
IEEE P – Progress Report
IEEE P – Progress Report
IEEE P802.22a – Progress Report
IEEE b – Progress Report
IEEE P Spectrum Characterization and Occupancy Sensing (SCOS) Study Group Progress Report
Letters of Assurance
Past and Future Meetings
Likely WG Motions at the November EC Meeting
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

3. IEEE 802.22 Meeting Agenda for the July 2015 Plenary can be found here
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
IEEE P WG Agenda
Opening Plenary
Motions at the EC
Forward P802.22b to RevCom
Press Release on Approval of P802.22b Amendment
IEEE P – Revision Project Approved. Work not started
IEEE P802.22b Enhancement to Broadband Services and Monitoring Applications – Sponsor Ballot Completed
IEEE P Spectrum Characterization and Occupancy Sensing (SCOS) Requirements Discussion
Tutorial – None
Mid-week plenary – Approval of the Press Release
Closing Plenary (Thursday, PM1)
EC Meeting
IEEE Meeting Agenda for the July 2015 Plenary can be found here
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

4. IEEE P802.22.1 Advanced Beaconing Progress Report
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
IEEE P Advanced Beaconing Progress Report
IEEE Standard was published in 2010
Revision Project on IEEE initiated that incorporates Advanced Beaconing for protection of systems in HF, VHF, UHF, and S-Band (2-4 GHz). Call for contributions made
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

5. Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
IEEE P Progress Report
IEEE Standard was published on July 1st 2011.
The revision PAR for IEEE Standard has been approved that folds in various on-going amendments (P802.22a, P802.22b) and generalizes it to other bands for spectrum sharing. The PAR form can be found here.
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

6. Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
IEEE P Progress Report
IEEE Standard was published on Sept. 28th 2012.
We would like to thank the members and contributors, Members of the IEEE 802 Executive Committee, Members of the IEEE SA RevCom, Members of the IEEE SA Board and the IEEE SA Staff.
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

7. IEEE P802.22a MIBs and Managememt Plane Procedures
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
IEEE P802.22a MIBs and Managememt Plane Procedures
P802.22a Sponsor Ballot Process has been successfully completed
Received RevCom Approval
Standard was published in June 2014
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

8. IEEE P802.22b Enhancement for Broadband Services and Monitoring Applications
2012
2013
2014 1 3 5 7 9 11
Task Group formed x
Process document
Functional Requirements
Call for Proposals issued
Selection Criteria x   x
Technical/Informative Contributions
Proposal presentations
Baseline proposal selected
Draft for 1st letter ballot
1st letter ballot completed
Comment Resolution
2nd letter ballot completed
Comment Resolution and recirculation
Sponsor ballot
RevCom/NesCom Approval
Chang-woo Pyo (NICT)
March 2012

9. Sponsor Ballot Summary for Draft v6.0, Re-circ #2
IEEE P802.22b Enhancement for Broadband Services and Monitoring Applications
Sponsor Ballot Summary for Draft v6.0, Re-circ #2
Chang-woo Pyo (NICT)
March 2012

10. IEEE P802.22.3 Spectrum Characterization and Occupancy Sensing
The IEEE P Spectrum Characterization and Occupancy Sensing (SCOS) PAR was approved by the EC and the IEEE SA NESCOM in July / August 2014
The IEEE P Requirements Definition was completed during the Berlin Plenary Meeting
Chang-woo Pyo (NICT)
March 2012

11. IEEE P802.22 Letter of Assurance
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
IEEE P Letter of Assurance
The LoAs can be found on the website at as well as on the IEEE SA website
Received one LoA from Hitachi Kokusai
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

12. Future Sessions IEEE 802.22 Future Sessions are planned as follows
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Future Sessions
IEEE Future Sessions are planned as follows
Session
Dates
Location
Plenary
March 8-13, 2015
Estrel Hotel and Convention Center, Berlin
Interim
May 10-15, 2015
Hyatt Regency, Vancouver
WG will not meet during Jan 2015 Session
July 12-17, 2015
Hilton Waikoloa Village, Kona, HI
September 13-18, 2015
TBD (Bangkok or Kuala Lumpur)
WG will not meet during Sep 2015 Session
November 8-13, 2015
Hyatt Regency Dallas, Dallas, TX
January 17-22, 2016
Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
March 13-18, 2016
Sands Venetian Hotel Macau, PRC
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

13. No Tutorials Sponsored by the IEEE 802.22 Working Group this time
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Sponsored Tutorial
No Tutorials Sponsored by the IEEE Working Group this time
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

14. July 2015
Motion
Motion for Approval to Forward the IEEE P802.22b (Amendment on Enhancements for Broadband Services and Monitoring Applications) to the IEEE SA-RevCom
Slide 14
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

15. IEEE P802.22b Sponsor Ballot History and Statistics
July 2015
IEEE P802.22b Sponsor Ballot History and Statistics
IEEE Sponsor Ballot
Launch Date
# of Comments Received
Comment Resolution Status
Response Ratio
Approval Ratio
Draft Status
SB #1
(P802.22b Draft v4.0)
8th Feb – 10th March 2015 33
Comments were addressed and Resolved
84%
100%
P802.22b Draft v5.0 Prepared
SB Re-circ #1
(P802.22b Draft v5.0)
29th April – 9th May 2015 2
86%
P802.22b Draft v6.0 Prepared
SB Re-circ #2
(P802.22b Draftv 6.0)
26th May to 6th June
87%
P802.22b Draf v6.0 to the IEEE SA-RevCom
Slide 15
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

16. Motion for Approval to forward the IEEE P802.22b to the IEEE SA RevCom
July 2015
Motion for Approval to forward the IEEE P802.22b to the IEEE SA RevCom
Vote Tally on the P802.22b Sponsor Ballot Re-circ #2 on P802.22b Draft 6.0
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

17. Motion for Approval to forward the IEEE P802.22b to the IEEE SA-RevCom
July 2015
Motion for Approval to forward the IEEE P802.22b to the IEEE SA-RevCom
We received Two Comments during Re-circulation Ballot #2 on Draft 6.0. One Technical and the Other Editorial. Both of these comments are NOT  ‘Must be Satisfied’ and the Votes from the Commenters are to Approve the P802.22b Draft 6.0.
The P802.22b Ballot Resolution Committee addressed and resolved the comments. They have been uploaded to MyProject and may also be found on the Mentor –
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

18. Motion for Approval to forward the IEEE P802.22b to the IEEE SA-RevCom
July 2015
Motion for Approval to forward the IEEE P802.22b to the IEEE SA-RevCom
Comment on P802.22b Draft 6.0 and their Resolution
Comment
Disposition Status
Disposition Detail
[TECHNICAL COMMENT - MUST BE SATISFIED – ‘NO’] I like most new structures. Optimized and extensible . However, has anybody measured application data throughput vs bandwidth used by overheads of complex MAC management frames and PHY level complexities? Does it make sense to review the spec from a perspective of reducing overheads (it would be great to identify choice points to better network bandwidth utilization by trading off with higher latencies, limited functionalities, stricter sequencing guidelines like max unsolicited bandwidth allocations per sub-frame or limited number of self-coexistence allocations depending on traffic in A-WRAN cell etc.). Maybe many of the header check sequences can become optional if the network is measured to be good and will become required only in noisy networks at a threshold? Existence or absense of HCS can be indicated by the size of these headers...
Rejected
This is an invalid comment, since the commenter makes a suggestion to optimize the P802.22b MAC but fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes can be determined. Conducting some study to review the spec from the perspective of reducing overhead is a good general suggestion but is not actionable. The Commenter points out that perhaps the Header Check Sequences (HCS) can become optional if the network is measured to be good. However, he does not specifically provide any actionable wordings such that any changes to the draft may be made. The Balloter has provided a General Comment but it does not pertain to any Clause that had been changed during the previous ballot or on any unresolved negatives. Hence the P802.22b Ballot Resolution Committee Rejects this comment.
[EDITORIAL COMMENT] There may be a typo in 9a Puncturing, In the crossed-out text you list the referenced subclause as " " However, the new text refers to " " I am not sure if you made a purposeful update or if this is simply a typo.
Accepted
The list of subclause is a typo. Please change " " to " " during the publication process.

19. Rules for Forwarding the Standards to IEEE SA RevCom
July 2015
Rules for Forwarding the Standards to IEEE SA RevCom
[IEEE 802 LMSC Operations Manual, v16 Revised November 7, 2014 Page 16]
Conditions:
Recirculation ballot is completed. Generally, the recirculation ballot and resolution should occur in accordance with the schedule presented at the time of conditional approval. – CONDITION SATISFIED
After resolution of the recirculation ballot is completed, the approval percentage is at least 75% and there are no new valid DISAPPROVE votes. – CONDITION SATISFIED
No technical changes, as determined by the WG Chair, were made as a result of the recirculation ballot. CONDITION SATISFIED
No new valid DISAPPROVE comments on new issues that are not resolved to the satisfaction of the submitter from existing DISAPPROVE voters. CONDITION SATISFIED
If the WG Chair determines that there is a new invalid DISAPPROVE comment or vote, the WG Chair shall promptly provide details to the Sponsor. N/A
The WG Chair shall immediately report the results of the ballot to the Sponsor including: the date the ballot closed, vote tally and comments associated with any remaining disapproves (valid and invalid), the WG responses and the rationale for ruling any vote invalid. DETAILS PROVIDED TO THE EC BY AN DATED JUNE
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

20. P802.22b WG Motion – Document – 22-15-0022 Rev0
July 2015
WG Motion
P802.22b WG Motion – Document – Rev0
The WG affirms that the P802.22b Draft 6.0 meets all the requirements of the P802.22b PAR and grandfathered 5C ( ). The WG authorizes the WG chair to seek approval from the IEEE 802 Executive Committee to forward P802.22b Draft 6.0, which has met all the conditions as stated in the IEEE 802 operations manual, to the IEEE SA RevCom.
Move: Chang-Woo Pyo
Second: Gabriel Villardi
For: 5
Against: 0
Abstain: 0
Motion Passes with Unanimous Consent.
Slide 20
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

21. Second: Steve Shellhammer For: Against: Abstain:
July 2015
Motion for a Approval to forward the IEEE P802.22b Draft 6.0 to the IEEE SA RevCom
EC Confirms the P802.22b PAR and the 5C and Moves to grant approval as per the IEEE 802 Operations Manual to forward IEEE P802.22b Draft 6.0 to the IEE SA- RevCom.
Move: Apurva N. Mody,
Second: Steve Shellhammer
For:
Against:
Abstain:
Any Objections, No Objections Heard
Motion Passes
Slide 21
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

22. Motion
Motion to Approve the Press Release on Completion of the P802.22b Amendment on Enhancements for Broadband Services and Monitoring Applications
Slide 22
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

23. July 2015
Working Group Motion for Approval of the Press Release on the Completion of the P802.22b Amendment
The WG approves the Press Release (PR) on the approval of the IEEE Std b Amendment on Enhancements for Broadband Services and Monitoring Applications by the IEEE as contained in document The WG authorizes the Chair to make a motion to the EC seeking approval to release this PR and make any additional changes based on comments from the EC or the IEEE-SA.
Move: Chang-Woo Pyo
Second: Gabriel Villardi
For: 5
Against: 0
Abstain: 0
Motion passed with unanimous consent.
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

24. EC Motion to Approve the P802.22b Press Release
July 2015
EC Motion to Approve the P802.22b Press Release
IEEE 802 EC approves the the P802.22b Project Completion Press Release (PR) as Provided in Document
Move: Apurva N. Mody
Second: Steve Shellhammer
For:
Against:
Abstain:
Motion passes/ fails
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

25. References 802.22 July 2015 Plenary Working Group Agenda
IEEE WG July Plenary Motions – Rev0
WG Policies and Procedures – Rev0
P802.22b Draft v4.0 Comment Database –
P802.22b Draft v5.0 Comment Database –
P802.22b Draft v6.0 Comment Database –
P802.22b Coexistence Assurance Document – Rev1
P802.22b PAR Form – Rev4
P802.22b 5C Document Rev4
Slide 25
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

26. IEEE P802.22b WG History and Statistics
July 2015
IEEE P802.22b WG History and Statistics
IEEE WG Letter Ballot
Launch Date
# of Comments Received
Comment Resolution Status
Response Ratio
Approval Ratio
Draft Status
WG LB #1
(P802.22b Draft v1.0)
Oct 2nd – 31st 2013
232 (27 TR / 4ER)
Comments were addressed and Resolved
75%
57.9%
P802.22b Draft v2.0 Prepared
WG LB #2
(P802.22b Draft v2.0)
April 12th - May 11th 2014
97 (10TR / 4ER/ 36 T)
78.1%
90.9%
P802.22b Draft v3.0 Prepared
WG Re-circ #1
(P802.22b Draftv 3.0)
Oct 14th – Oct. 28th 2014
26 (10TR / 3T)
84.3%
95.6%
P802.22b Draft v4.0 Prepared
WG Re-circ #2
(P802.22b Draft v4.0)
Jan 13th – 27th 2015
N/ A
100%
P802.22b Draft v4.0 to be forwarded to the Sponsor Ballot
P802.22b is ON TRACK to reach the Sponsor Ballot by December 2014
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
Slide 26