Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GRWG Summary Decisions, Actions, Recommendations

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "GRWG Summary Decisions, Actions, Recommendations"— Presentation transcript:

1 GRWG Summary Decisions, Actions, Recommendations
09 April 2019 GRWG Summary Decisions, Actions, Recommendations

2 Mini Conference Latest progress of CMA FY-3D and FY-4 satellite(Peng Zhang) Development of SI-traceable Hyperspectral FTIR instrument(Lei Ding) FY-4A satellite commissioning latest outcome(Qiang Guo) GOES-16 calibration and validation(John Fullbright) Post-launch test progress of FY-3D(Zhongdong Yang) NOAA-20 Imager/Sounder SDR Maturity and Collaboration with FY3D through GSICS(Changyong Cao/Lin lin) Solar band SI-traceable demonstration instrument(Feng Jiang) Tansat/ACGS inflight calibration and validation(Yanmeng Bi/Zhongdong Yang) TG-2 Multi-Angle Polarization Imager Calibration and evaluation(Dekui Yin/Yipeng Zhang)

3 Mini Conference A.GWG g.1 Fred Wu to discuss with CMA potential sharing of GOES-R field campaign data for TANSAT validation R.GWG k.1 CMA to consider performing comparisons of MERSI and TanSat/ACGS

4 Plenary(GPRC report) FY4A : PST results and calibration of AGRI, GIIRS and LMI GOES-16 : overview of cal/val plan NOAA-20 : will be disseminated soon to the users. FY-3D : on-going post-launch test of HIRAS, GAS Solar band SI-traceable demonstration instrument

5 Plenary (WG report/Briefing)
A.GCC b.1 Manik Bali to set up web meeting to discuss requirements for sharing SNO predictions and/or tools. A.GIR d.1 Likun Wang (NOAA) to coordinate routine comparisons of potential hyperspectral reference instruments (extended to include HIRAS) and report at annual meeting. A.GIR j.1 Fangfang Yu (NOAA) and Masaya (JMA) to investigate radiance dependence of ABI 3.9 micron channel

6 GRWG (UV-sub group) ground-based calibration of cutting-edge instruments under development in-orbit calibration, validation and characterization of operational sensors methods for comparing and monitoring long-term satellite records

7 GRWG (UV-sub group) A.GRWG.2018.6g.1
Munro to hold a UV Subgroup web meetings focused on a specific UV project topic during the coming six months A.GRWG g.2 Flynn to provide information on the effect of dichroics on bandpass calculations A.GRWG g.3 All members (UVSG Chair to coordinate) to find researchers interested in the four UV SG projects and invite them to future meetings as the agenda and their interests dictate.

8 GRWG (MW sub-group) (1/3)
Learned a lot about China’s MW sensors, operational and in development Discussed potential best practices, focusing on more in depth activities leading the deliverables in the upcoming year GPSRO as potential reference for certain O2 bands

9 GRWG (MW-sub group) (2/3)
A.GMW e.1 GSICS (C. Zou, Q. Lu?) and CEOS WGVC (Dong) to coordinate on best practice for MW Sensors and coordinate on the development of a MW ISO sensor document (similar to other wavelengths) lead by Dong’s group.    A.GMW g.1 GPSRO focal points (Zou/Lin and Hu) to further evaluate their results for effects of cloud water and cloud ice and report back to the group within 6 months. A.GMW k.1 In order to determine best practice for post-launch, Manik will survey existing satellite operator monitoring pages and present finding within 6 months.

10 GRWG (MW-sub group) (3/3)
A.GMW k.2 In order to move forward with a MW SNO best practice, a closer survey needs to be performed (e.g., IR group's GSICS product ATBD , what parameters were used for different MW bands, etc.). Action assigned - TBD A.GMW k.3 To determine if the NOAA CDR (MSU/AMSU/ATMS) is a viable in-orbit reference, Zou and Bali will report back to the group after a forthcoming paper is published. A.GMW l.1 Collect and document "best practices" to see if GMI can serve as an in-orbit reference. (Ralph Ferraro and Wes Berg). 

11 GRWG (IR-sub group)-1/3 A.GIR.2018.4b.1
Masaya(JMA) to report de double differences with CrIS A.GIR b.2 Xu Na(CMA) to prepare ATBD and other information to submit to GCC for the demonstration FY-2 products A.GIR b.3 Manik(NOAA) To follow on distribution of the correction coefficients to GSICS ISRO A.2018.GIR.4c.1 JMA(Masaya)/CMA(Na) to work together on making GEO-GEO inter-comparison, using IASI A.2018.GIR.4c.2 Yusuke Yog (JMA) To make comparisons between JMA SBAF and NASA SBAF tool

12 GRWG (IR-sub group)-2/3 A.GIR.2018.4d.1
Xu Na (CMA) and NOAA to compare with the NOAA and JMA gap filling methods. To report at the next Web meeting in 2-3 months A.GIR d.2 Likun Wang (NOAA) to set up web meeting to discuss comparisons of gap-filling methods and plan way forward by June 2018 A.GIR d.3 Hui Xu to apply gap-filling method to IASI following to previous comment (two IASI data wt/wo gap) A.GIR f.1 CMA to apply Likun Wang collocation method to LEO-LEO cases A.GIR p.1 Tim Hewison to organise a web meeting on IRREFUTABLE in September

13 GRWG (IR-sub group)-3/3 A.GIR.2018.4r.1
Likun Wang (NOAA) will work with CNES and EUMETSAT to document the best practice of IR hyperspectral sounding processing A.GIR t.1 Tim Hewison (EUMETSAT) to set up web meeting to review different GEO-LEO IR inter-calibration algorithm evolutions and invite Tim Trent to give update on results Decision CrIS accepted as reference

14 GRWG (VI/NIR-lunar calibration)
Key outcome from 2nd lunar workshop (2017) Lunar model val using ground based hyperspectral measurement Interband cal of MERSI-II new channels with lunar obs. GIRO benchmark to validate GIRO against ROLO, and GIRO is recommended for instrument cal as it is Alternative use of lunar observations to characterize MTF A.GVNIR e.1 Tom Stone (USGS) to invite ESA to present progress on lunar calibration at the 2019 GRWG meeting and next lunar calibration workshop

15 GRWG (VI/NIR-sub-group)
Tansat/CAPI solar diffuser calibration process and result FY-3D/MERSI-II calibration/validation Calibration monitoring based on Tibet glaciers New BRDF model in Dunhuang for vicarious calibration status of T/A MODIS and VIIRS on NPP/JPSS-1 and the on-orbit performance of RSB Update on the NASA-Langley SBAF tool Rayleigh calibration as GSICS calibration method MODIS to VIIRS as calibration reference for GSICS VIS/NIR group CLARREO PATHFINDER GSICS requirements DCC GSICS GEO calibration paper

16 GRWG (VI/NIR-sub-group)
A.GVNIR s.1 Bertrand to organize a web meeting before June 30 on the Rayleigh calibration A.GVNIR u.1 Dave Doelling (NASA) to review KMA's implementation of the DCC method A.GVNIR v.1 Dave Doelling (NASA) to set up web meeting by end April 2018 to select reference bands and calibration processing version for S-NPP/VIIRS reference dataset for inter-calibration A.GVNIR v.2 Dave Doelling (NASA) to set up web meeting to plan journal paper on DCC method by end June 2018. A.GVNIR v.3 Dave Doelling (NASA) to set up web meeting to discuss extension of DCC method to NIR by 28 Feb 2019

17 GRWG (VI/NIR-sub-group)
A.GVNIR v.4 Raj Bhatt (NASA) to generate DCC reference dataset from selected VIIRS data by 31 July 2018. A.GVNIR v.5 Dave Doelling (NASA) to set up web meeting before 30 Sept 2018 to solicit inputs from all GPRCs on preferred sites to be characterised by CLARREO Pathfinder.

18 Plenary (cross cutting issue)
Mitch Eric Shirley (NIST) should be the GSICS focal point and report back to us Pre-launch characteristics Tim to hold a planning web meeting for the workshop by September 2018 CLARREO like workshop GRWG needs to define attributes to show stability of instrument in 1 page report template that will be used by satellite operators? Mitch needs by April 30 satellite operators for Vis and IR. JMA to provide the template. GSICS-EP-18.03 (GRWG Chair) Each agency to provide to define minimum information for performance monitoring “specification and requirements” by 15 May 2018 GSICS-EP-18.01

19 CGMS-46 working paper Hyperspectral intercalibration and reprocessing
IASI, AIRS and CrIS data are all being reprocessed This would imply some kind of intercomparison/cross-validation avtivities as these instruments are at the core of GSICS GSICS would have to ensure that the quality of the data responds to our expectation

20 Thank you


Download ppt "GRWG Summary Decisions, Actions, Recommendations"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google