1. Volume 388, Issue 10058, Pages 2375-2385 (November 2016)
Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial 
Prof Angus J M Watson, FRCS, Jemma Hudson, MSc, Jessica Wood, BSc, Mary Kilonzo, MSc, Steven R Brown, MD, Alison McDonald, MSc, Prof John Norrie, MSc, Hanne Bruhn, PhD, Jonathan A Cook, PhD 
The Lancet 
Volume 388, Issue 10058, Pages (November 2016)
DOI: /S (16)
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Trial profile
Numbers of participants declining further follow-up or not responding to the questionnaire are cumulative in direction of participant flow.
The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (16) )
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
AUC EQ-5D-3L score comparison between stapled haemorrhoidopexy and traditional excisional surgery groups
Participants need to have at least one short-term and one long-term follow-up score for inclusion in the primary analysis. Mean (SD); N is shown for 6 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months. ED-5D-3L AUC=EuroQoL 5 dimensions 3 level area under a curve. A breakdown of the number of participants included at each timepoint in the analysis is given in the appendix (p 3).
The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (16) )
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license Terms and Conditions