1. Coexistence Straw Polls from November 2006 Plenary in Dallas, TX
December 2006
December 2006
Coexistence Straw Polls from November 2006 Plenary in Dallas, TX
Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

2. December 2006
December 2006
Summary of Straw Polls
This document contains the individual straw polls taken during the Coexistence Ad hoc meetings in November 2006 in Dallas, TX.
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

3. TGn Straw Poll 11-13-06 40MHz operation in 2.4GHz
December 2006
December 2006
TGn Straw Poll MHz operation in 2.4GHz
Would you prefer forbiding 40MHz in 2.4GHz or continuing to work on a compromise solution? Vote for one.
Forbid 40MHz 70
Continue Working 29
Abstain 6
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

4. TGn Straw Poll 11-14-06 40MHz operation in 2.4GHz
December 2006
December 2006
TGn Straw Poll MHz operation in 2.4GHz
Would you prefer forbidding 40MHz in 2.4GHz or continuing to work this work until Thursday on a compromise solution? Vote for one.
Forbid 40MHz in 2.4GHz 54
Continue Working until Thurs. 20
Abstain
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

5. December 2006
December 2006
Straw Poll
Do you agree that (a) GF MAC protection should be mandatory in a mixed HT/11abg BSS, and also (b) that some mechanism to advertise the presence of legacy devices to neighboring APs is desirable?
Y 26
N 4
A 15
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

6. TGn Straw Poll 11-16-06 40MHz operation in 2.4GHz
December 2006
December 2006
TGn Straw Poll MHz operation in 2.4GHz
Would you support forbidding 40MHz in 2.4GHz ?
Y = 34
N = 3
A = 24
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

7. December 2006
December 2006
Straw Poll
Are you willing to consider this proposal (1699r3) potentially with minor changes?
Y = 50
N = 19
A = 10
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

8. TGn Straw Poll 11-16-06 40MHz operation in 2.4GHz
December 2006
December 2006
TGn Straw Poll MHz operation in 2.4GHz
Would you prefer to wait until Jan’07 Adhoc to resolve 40MHz operation in 2.4GHz?
Y = 4
N = 68
A = 9
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

9. TGn Straw Poll 11-16-06 40MHz operation in 2.4GHz
December 2006
December 2006
TGn Straw Poll MHz operation in 2.4GHz
Would you find it preferable if the secondary channel threshold have a maximum of 20%?
Y = 25
N = 6
A = 39
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

10. TGn Straw Poll 11-16-06 40MHz operation in 2.4GHz
December 2006
December 2006
TGn Straw Poll MHz operation in 2.4GHz
Would you find it preferable if the secondary channel threshold have a maximum of 10%?
Y = 19
N = 0
A = 44
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing

11. December 2006
December 2006
Straw Poll
Are you willing to consider this proposal (1699r3) with only reduction to maximum SCA threshold?
Y = 25
N = 30
A = 12
Don Schultz, Boeing
Don Schultz, Boeing