Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLaurel Stevens Modified over 6 years ago
1
Retrospective cataloguing, or, The ‘forgotten’ projects
The need for a national strategy
2
Retro challenges Perceptions Reluctance and disinterest
Missed opportunities How much work had been done and why had it stopped?
3
The past. 1 Early 1990s, unknown mass 1994-1995 FIGIT study
BLRIC study 1997 Making the most of our libraries 548 libraries responded 50 million records awaiting retroconversion calls for a national programme 5 year target Nominates the LIC
4
The past. 2 1998 BL convenes a Pathfinding Group and funds a study.
1999 Full Disclosure Supports national programme 10 years to complete 80% of the work Nominates the new MLA RSLP £30 million for projects including retro 48 HEIs, 68% of these used the funds for retro work ? MLA Britain in Print Pre 1700s British printed books
5
The past. 3 2004 CURL survey following end of RSLP
Participants used RSLP funds 14 million items “prepare the ground for future funding bids” Copac Challenge Fund Free or low cost access to CURL database 2007 RIN study 95 libraries responded (23% from HE) 200 researchers responded 50% of research collections still ‘hidden’ Repeats call for a national strategy
6
The present. 1 New Year’s resolution
Merged discussion list Proposed a new survey Joining forces with RLUK Survey launch July with help from MIMAS
7
The present. 2 75 libraries responded (39% from HE)
15% not visible online at all 10.6 million items outstanding – 14% 1.2 million items requiring record enhancement Most items from 16th to 20th century Much of the backlog can be termed special collections Non-book formats less likely to be catalogued at all
8
The present. 3 55% have ongoing projects – of these 7 libraries plan to end in 2020 16% plan to start in the next 2 years 12% have no immediate plans 10% have completed projects 7% have halted because of lack of funds 46% of these have no immediate plans to resume work
9
The future. 1 Now what? MLA? Desired outcomes of respondents
Funding, awareness, visibility, collaborative working, national strategy Other comments Funding, security, practical help, digitisation, value of historical colls., visibility, etc.
10
The future. 2 Online National Register
90% survey respondents in favour Full Disclosure prioritisation matrix RIN good practice guide
11
Dunia García-Ontiveros Head of Retrospective Cataloguing The London Library
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.