1. PICS CF items Date: 2019-04-04 Author: April 2019 May 2015
doc.: IEEE /0496r1
April 2019
PICS CF items
Date:
Author:
Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)

2. Background: CID 6573 in REVmc (1)
May 2015
doc.: IEEE /0496r1
April 2019
Background: CID 6573 in REVmc (1)
Comment:
The PICS abbreviations are not helpful
Proposed change
Come up with some more useful abbreviations for the fundamental stuff, e.g. use "CF-IBSS" instead of "CF2.2" and "CF-HT" instead of "CF16“
Resolution
Change the PICs identifier abreviations identified in item (old) to Item (New) in the table under CID 6573 in doc 11-15/762r11 <
Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)

3. Background: CID 6573 in REVmc (2)
May 2015
doc.: IEEE /0496r1
April 2019
Background: CID 6573 in REVmc (2)
Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)

4. From our MDR review, however …
May 2015
doc.: IEEE /0496r1
April 2019
From our MDR review, however …
Do we still need CF2.3, CF3, CF5, and CF24? We are no longer using number to enumerate these CF entries. For example:
Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)

5. How do the TG want to proceed?
May 2015
doc.: IEEE /0496r1
April 2019
How do the TG want to proceed?
Option 1:
Remove CF2.3, CF3, CF5, and CF24 from Draft 2.0
Option 2:
Wait till the next recirculation letter ballot to submit a comment to resolve it.
Any other option?
Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)