1. Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1644-1651 (August 2016)
Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year 
Francesco Zanon, MD, FESC, FHRS, Lina Marcantoni, MD, Enrico Baracca, MD, Gianni Pastore, MD, Daniela Lanza, MD, Chiara Fraccaro, MD, PhD, Claudio Picariello, MD, Luca Conte, MD, Silvio Aggio, MD, Loris Roncon, MD, Domenico Pacetta, Eng, Nima Badie, PhD, Franco Noventa, MD, Frits W. Prinzen, PhD, FESC 
Heart Rhythm 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
DOI: /j.hrthm
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Anatomical distribution of LV leads. Distribution of lead location among the 15 LV wall segments, shown as the percentage of patients in each group. LV = left ventricular; MPP = multipoint pacing; OPT = optimized; RV = right ventricle; STD = standard.
Heart Rhythm  , DOI: ( /j.hrthm )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
ΔESVi, ΔNYHA, and Packer’s response rates. Response indicates ΔESVi ≥15%, ΔNYHA class >0, or Packer score 0 at follow-up relative to preimplantation baseline values. The vertical segments represent the 95% confidence intervals of the estimated proportions. ESVi = end-systolic volume index; MPP = multipoint pacing; NYHA = New York Heart Association; OPT = optimized; STD = standard.
Heart Rhythm  , DOI: ( /j.hrthm )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Reduction in NYHA class (NYHA class at follow-up minus baseline NYHA class). The black slice indicates patients who did not show any improvement in NYHA class. MPP = multipoint pacing; NYHA = New York Heart Association; OPT = optimized; STD = standard.
Heart Rhythm  , DOI: ( /j.hrthm )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions