1. Agenda and minutes TGn PHY ad hoc
July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Agenda and minutes TGn PHY ad hoc
Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

2. July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Abstract
Agenda and minutes of TGn sessions for July 2007 IEEE meeting in San Francisco, California, USA.
PHY comments may be found in 11-07/0341.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

3. July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Highlights of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
Participants have a duty to tell the IEEE if they know (based on personal awareness) of potentially Essential Patent Claims they or their employer own
Participants are encouraged to tell the IEEE if they know of potentially Essential Patent Claims owned by others
This encouragement is particularly strong as the third party may not be a participant in the standards process
Working Group required to request assurance
Early assurance is encouraged
Terms of assurance shall be either:
Reasonable and nondiscriminatory, with or without monetary compensation; or,
A statement of non-assertion of patent rights
Assurances
Shall be provided on the IEEE-SA Standards Board approved LOA form
May optionally include not-to-exceed rates, terms, and conditions
Shall not be circumvented through sale or transfer of patents
Shall be brought to the attention of any future assignees or transferees
Shall apply to Affiliates unless explicitly excluded
Are irrevocable once submitted and accepted
Shall be supplemented if Submitter becomes aware of other potential Essential Patent Claims
A “Blanket Letter of Assurance” may be provided at the option of the patent holder
A patent holder has no duty to perform a patent search
Full policy available at 1
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

4. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
6.2 Policy
IEEE standards may be drafted in terms that include the use of Essential Patent Claims. If the IEEE receives notice that a [Proposed] IEEE Standard may require the use of a potential Essential Patent Claim, the IEEE shall request licensing assurance, on the IEEE Standards Board approved Letter of Assurance form, from the patent holder or patent applicant. The IEEE shall request this assurance without coercion.
The Submitter of the Letter of Assurance may, after Reasonable and Good Faith Inquiry, indicate it is not aware of any Patent Claims that the Submitter may own, control, or have the ability to license that might be or become Essential Patent Claims. If the patent holder or patent applicant provides an assurance, it should do so as soon as reasonably feasible in the standards development process. This assurance shall be provided prior to the Standards Board’s approval of the standard. This assurance shall be provided prior to a reaffirmation if the IEEE receives notice of a potential Essential Patent Claim after the standard’s approval or a prior reaffirmation. An asserted potential Essential Patent Claim for which an assurance cannot be obtained (e.g., a Letter of Assurance is not provided or the Letter of Assurance indicates that assurance is not being provided) shall be referred to the Patent Committee.
A Letter of Assurance shall be either:
a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the Submitter without conditions will not enforce any present or future Essential Patent Claims against any person or entity making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing, distributing, or implementing a compliant implementation of the standard; or
b) A statement that a license for a compliant implementation of the standard will be made available to an unrestricted number of applicants on a worldwide basis without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination. At its sole option, the Submitter may provide with its assurance any of the following: (i) a not-to-exceed license fee or rate commitment, (ii) a sample license agreement, or (iii) one or more material licensing terms. 2
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

5. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
Copies of an Accepted LOA may be provided to the working group, but shall not be discussed, at any standards working group meeting.
The Submitter and all Affiliates (other than those Affiliates excluded in a Letter of Assurance) shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights in any Essential Patent Claims that are the subject of such Letter of Assurance that they hold, control, or have the ability to license with the intent of circumventing or negating any of the representations and commitments made in such Letter of Assurance.
The Submitter of a Letter of Assurance shall agree (a) to provide notice of a Letter of Assurance either through a Statement of Encumbrance or by binding any assignee or transferee to the terms of such Letter of Assurance; and (b) to require its assignee or transferee to (i) agree to similarly provide such notice and (ii) to bind its assignees or transferees to agree to provide such notice as described in (a) and (b).
This assurance shall apply to the Submitter and its Affiliates except those Affiliates the Submitter specifically excludes on the relevant Letter of Assurance.
If, after providing a Letter of Assurance to the IEEE, the Submitter becomes aware of additional Patent Claim(s) not already covered by an existing Letter of Assurance that are owned, controlled, or licensable by the Submitter that may be or become Essential Patent Claim(s) for the same IEEE Standard but are not the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, then such Submitter shall submit a Letter of Assurance stating its position regarding enforcement or licensing of such Patent Claims. For the purposes of this commitment, the Submitter is deemed to be aware if any of the following individuals who are from, employed by, or otherwise represent the Submitter have personal knowledge of additional potential Essential Patent Claims, owned or controlled by the Submitter, related to a [Proposed] IEEE Standard and not already the subject of a previously submitted Letter of Assurance: (a) past or present participants in the development of the [Proposed] IEEE Standard, or (b) the individual executing the previously submitted Letter of Assurance. 3
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

6. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
The assurance is irrevocable once submitted and accepted and shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal.
The IEEE is not responsible for identifying Essential Patent Claims for which a license may be required, for conducting inquiries into the legal validity or scope of those Patent Claims, or for determining whether any licensing terms or conditions are reasonable or non-discriminatory.
Nothing in this policy shall be interpreted as giving rise to a duty to conduct a patent search. No license is implied by the submission of a Letter of Assurance.
In order for IEEE’s patent policy to function efficiently, individuals participating in the standards development process: (a) shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of the holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware and that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents; and (b) should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance. 4
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

7. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.
Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.
Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.
Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.
Technical considerations remain primary focus
Don’t discuss fixing product prices, allocation of customers, or dividing sales markets.
Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.
Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object.
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.
This slide set is available at 5
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

8. Status 186 unresolved comments So PHY is about 45% finished
July 2007
Status
186 unresolved comments
Includes 12 comments with resolutions approved by ad hoc but deferred from motion
344 comments when ad hoc formed
So PHY is about 45% finished
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

9. July 2007
Unresolved comments
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

10. Notes on Topic Group Tables
July 2007
Notes on Topic Group Tables
All submissions are of form 11-07/xxxxrx, where the leading 11-07/ is not shown in the table to save space
Submission numbers in bold have been approved by ad hoc but not approved by TGn
Submissions numbers underlined have been approved by TGn
Submissions numbers in italics have been presented and are closed but not approved
Comments with a resolution status of deferred in submissions referenced by this document have not been resolved in the ad hoc
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

11. Topic Groups (1) July 2007 Topic # CID volunteer Sub 40 MHz operations
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Topic Groups (1)
Topic
# CID
volunteer
Sub
40 MHz operations 9
Bjorn
2046r1
antenna
Vinko
0608r1
CCA 6
Assaf
0457r3, 2195r1
channelization 1
Eldad
0554r2, 2033r0
cyclic shift 3
0632r1, 2083r0
duplicate 23
Jim P
0601r6
evm 10
0646r2
FEC
George V.
0582r5 GI
0598r1
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

12. Greenfield (inc. motions set 4)
July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Topic Groups (2)
Greenfield (inc. motions set 4) 13
Eldad
0555r2
HT-legacy spec 4
Assaf
0557r2, 2198r1
Introduction 7
 Jim P.
September
mask 17
Vinko
2081r1
misc 14
Jim P.
2093r1
PHY equations 12
Assaf 
 2077r2
PHY Time 10
Eldad 
 2033r0
PHY vectors
0647r1, 2129r2
PLCP 11
0554r2, 0621r1, 2034r1
preamble
Bjorn
0516r3
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

13. Topic Groups (3) July 2007 receiver spec Eldad 0554r2, 0621r1 RSSI 7
Eldad
0554r2, 0621r1
RSSI 7
Jim P.
0588r1
scrambler 1
0554r2, 2033r0
service primitive 17
Assaf
2076r1
smoothing 3
Vinko
0609r3
STBC 4
Jeremy
0544r6, 0545r0, 0546r2, 0790r0, 2024r1
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

14. July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Agenda Items
EMRs
+CID 1599 (STBC) covered in 11-07/2024r0
+CID 2695 (cyclic shift) covered without submission
Open comment groups with comments without new submissions
CCA (Assaf Kasher)
FEC (George Vlantis)
HT-Legacy (Assaf Kasher)
Almost resolved issues awaiting new submissions
Green field (motion set 4)
+STBC (STBC) mandatory, related to 11-07/0790r0
Newly discovered issues
+11-07/2092r0 (L-SIG spoof length) Richard van Nee
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

15. Agenda Items Other pending submissions (1)
July 2007
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Agenda Items
Other pending submissions (1)
11-07/2046r0 (40 MHz operations) Bjorn Bjerke
+11-07/2083r0 (cyclic shift) Vinko Erceg
+11-07/0601r6 (duplicate) Jim Petranovich
+11-07/0646r2 (evm) Vinko Erceg
+11-07/2081r1 (mask) Vinko Erceg
+11-07/2093r1 (misc) Jim Petranovich
+11-07/2077r2 (PHY equations) Assaf Kasher
+11-07/2033r0 (PHY time) Eldad Perahia
+11-07/2034r1 (PLCP) Eldad Perahia
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

16. Agenda Items Other pending submissions (2)
July 2007
Agenda Items
Other pending submissions (2)
+11-07/0621r1 (PLCP) Eldad Perahia
+11-07/0588r1 (RSSI) Jim Petranovich
+11-07/2076r1 (service primitive) Assaf Kasher
+11-07/0609r3 (smoothing) Vinko Erceg
+11-07/0790r0 (STBC) Doug Chan
+11-07/2129r2 (PHY vectors) Assaf Kasher
11-07/0555r1 (Greenfield) Eldad Perahia
11-07/yyyyyr0 (Greenfield) Doug Chen
+11-07/2092r0 (L-SIG spoof length) Richard van Nee
+11-07/2024r1 (STBC) John Ketchum
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

17. Minutes Wednesday July 11
No issues with the IEEE patent policy were noted\
11-07/2092r0 (L-SIG spoof length) Richard van Nee
PHY ad hoc unanimously agreed this should be resolved
Should also correct in D2.04
Will be resolved in coex as part of CID 402
11-07/2024r1 (STBC) John Ketchum
Note that 2024r1 was created and reviewed in meeting
Accepted unanimously
CID 2695 (cyclic shifts) EMR
Accepted EMR with modification noted in comment database
11-07/0790r0 (STBC) Eldad Perahia
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

18. Minutes Wednesday July 11
11-07/2083r0 (cyclic shift) Vinko Erceg
Accepted unanimously
11-07/2081r0 (mask) Vinko Erceg
Created r1 as a result of discussion
Deferred discussion of CID 747, 748, 1610
CID 1821 deferred
Stopped on CID 1917
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

19. Minutes Thursday July 12 11-07/2081r0 (mask) Vinko Erceg
Resumed from Wednesday
Made minor wording changes regarding regulatory requirements
11-07/2076r0 (service primitive) Assaf Kasher
Correct formatting problem by creating an r1
Discussed eliminating the PLCP-PMD interface, which is a useless interface layer, but many members felt that eliminating it require excess explanation in sponsor ballot and so did not explore this option
Made minor text change regarding RCPI.
Will defer acceptance.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

20. Minutes Thursday July 12 11-07/0621r1 (PLCP) Eldad Perahia
Accepted unanimously
11-07/2033r0 (PHY time) Eldad Perahia
11-07/2034r1 (PLCP) Eldad Perahia
11-07/0601r4 (duplicate) Jim Petranovich
Defer resolution of CID 1793
Modified resolution of CID 2051
Created version r5
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

21. Minutes Friday July 13 11-07/2093r0 (misc) Jim Petranovich
Changed resolution of url-related comments to add doc numbrs. Noted that CID 410 will also be resolved
Changed CID2652 to reject
Created r1
Accepted unanimously
11-07/0588r0 (RSSI) Jim Petranovich
Changed CID 2749 to reject
Changed CID 3388 to reject
R1 created with changes agreed to in ad hoc
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

22. Minutes Friday July 13 11-07/2129r0 (PHY vectors) Assaf Kasher
Need to determine how to handle definitions, working with Terry Cole, may need new ideas
Created r1 to fix minor typos
Accepted unanimously
11-07/2077r0 (PHY equations) Assaf Kasher
Changed to r1 to fix typos
Created r2 to correct text
11-07/0601r6 (duplicate) Jim Petranovich
Agreed to resolve CID 1793 by deleting –nTsym from left hand side of equation
Will create r6
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

23. Minutes Friday July 13 11-07/2076r1 (service primitive) Assaf Kasher
Accepted r1 unanimously
11-07/0609r2 (smoothing) Vinko Erceg
Minor changes, created r3
Accepted unanimously
11-07/0646r1 (evm) Vinko Erceg
Minor changes to text
Created version r2
CID 3245 (FEC) withdrawn by commentor
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

24. Monday, July 16 Status update All comments assigned
Remaining PHY comments: 186 comments
Resolutions approved by ad hoc: 146 comments
Comments without proposed resolutions: 40
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

25. Tuesday, July 17—Agenda Review proposed motions Submissions
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Tuesday, July 17—Agenda
Review proposed motions
Submissions
11-07/2046r0 (40 MHz operations) Bjorn Bjerke
11-07/0555r1 (Greenfield) Eldad Perahia
11-07/2195r0 (CCA) Assaf Kasher
11-07/2198r0 (HT-Legacy) Assaf Kasher
Discuss remaining CIDs with no proposed resolution
Are the volunteers prepared to address these comments in the September ad hoc?
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

26. Tuesday, July17—Proposed Motions
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Tuesday, July17—Proposed Motions
Propose to make the following motions to TGn
Approve resolutions to CIDs as proposed in these submissions
Motion 4 (deferred in May)
Motion 6: 11-07/0588r1, 11-07/0601r6, 11-07/0609r3, 11-07/0621r1
Motion 7:11-07/0646r2, 11-07/0790r0, 11-07/2033r0, 11-07/2034r1, 11-07/2076r1
Motion 8:, 11-07/2077r2, 11-07/2081r1, 11-07/2083r0, 11-07/2093r0, 2129r3
Motion 9: Approve resolution of the following CIDs as per latest PHY spreadsheet (currently 11-07/0341r9)
CID 1599
CID 2695
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

27. Minutes Tuesday July No issues with patent policy noted
Doug Chen withdraw intent to submit regarding GF
Proposed motions reviewed, motion set 4 added
Agenda set
11-07/2046r0 (40 MHz operations) Bjorn Bjerke
Noted possible inconsistency with 11-07/2129r1, defer resolution of CID 78
CID 799 resolution deferred, consider clause 18 as well
Create r1 with changes above
Approved unanimously
Agreed to motion this week
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

28. Minutes Tuesday July July 2007 11-07/2198r0 (HT-Legacy) Assaf Kasher
doc.: IEEE /2084r7
July 2007
Minutes Tuesday July
11-07/2198r0 (HT-Legacy) Assaf Kasher
Noted that resolution of CID 2899 as proposed may cause an EMR due to impact on 9.6, agreed to defer this resolution
Made minor changes
Changed resolution to CID 2750 to reject
Will create r1
Approved unanimously
Agreed to motion this week
11-07/2195r0 (CCA) Assaf Kasher
Agreed to defer resolution to CID 1626
Move resolution of CID 1678 into 11-07/0555r2 (to be created by Eldad Perahia)
Discussed whether we should bring GF comments (11-07/0555r2) to motion
Agreed to do so (see straw poll next page)
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.

29. July 2007
Straw Poll
Should the PHY ad hoc chair move that TGn accept the comment resolutions presented in 11-07/0555r2 (0555r1 plus the resolution of CID 1678 presented in 2195r0)?
Y : 14
N: 0
A: 1
Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems Inc.