Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published by籍 秘 Modified over 5 years ago
1
Rail Program Management Services Review Grade Separation Recommended Ideas
Palo Alto Rail Committee Meeting ……..
2
From Presentation to City Council on May 29, 2018
3
Ideas to Review Meadow / Charleston Hybrid (MCH)
A "hybrid" option that would partially lower the road and partially elevate the tracks Meadow / Charleston Reverse Hybrid (MCR) The “reverse hybrid" option with a partially elevated road and partially lowered tracks
4
Meadow / Charleston Hybrid (MCL)
Meadow Dr Charleston Rd Rail Embankment Fill at Meadow = 14 ft Roadway Excavation at Meadow = 7 ft Rail Embankment Fill at Charleston = 14 ft Roadway Excavation at Charleston = 6 ft 1% Maximum Grade Length = 5050 ft 2% Maximum Grade Length = 4750 ft Wilton Ave Constraints: Limit impacts to properties at Meadow and Charleston Temporary Track (Shoofly) Length with 1% =6400 ft Temporary Track (Shoofly) Length with 2%= 6000 ft Monroe Dr
5
Driveways
7
Meadow / Charleston Reverse Hybrid (MCR)
Meadow Dr Charleston Rd Rail Embankment Excavation at Meadow = 31 ft Roadway Fill at Meadow = 2 ft Rail Embankment Excavation at Charleston = 31 ft Roadway Fill at Charleston = 1 ft 1% Maximum Grade Length = NOT FEASIBLE 2% Maximum Grade Length = 6825 ft Wilton Ave Constraints: Limit impacts to properties at Meadow and Charleston Temporary Track (Shoofly) Length with 2%= 7600 ft Monroe Dr
8
Driveways
10
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.