Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Rail Program Management Services Review Grade Separation Recommended Ideas Palo Alto Rail Committee Meeting 08.15.18 ……..

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Rail Program Management Services Review Grade Separation Recommended Ideas Palo Alto Rail Committee Meeting 08.15.18 …….."— Presentation transcript:

1 Rail Program Management Services Review Grade Separation Recommended Ideas
Palo Alto Rail Committee Meeting ……..

2 From Presentation to City Council on May 29, 2018

3 Ideas to Review Meadow / Charleston Hybrid (MCH)
A "hybrid" option that would partially lower the road and partially elevate the tracks Meadow / Charleston Reverse Hybrid (MCR) The “reverse hybrid" option with a partially elevated road and partially lowered tracks

4 Meadow / Charleston Hybrid (MCL)
Meadow Dr Charleston Rd Rail Embankment Fill at Meadow = 14 ft Roadway Excavation at Meadow = 7 ft Rail Embankment Fill at Charleston = 14 ft Roadway Excavation at Charleston = 6 ft 1% Maximum Grade Length = 5050 ft 2% Maximum Grade Length = 4750 ft Wilton Ave Constraints: Limit impacts to properties at Meadow and Charleston Temporary Track (Shoofly) Length with 1% =6400 ft Temporary Track (Shoofly) Length with 2%= 6000 ft Monroe Dr

5 Driveways

6

7 Meadow / Charleston Reverse Hybrid (MCR)
Meadow Dr Charleston Rd Rail Embankment Excavation at Meadow = 31 ft Roadway Fill at Meadow = 2 ft Rail Embankment Excavation at Charleston = 31 ft Roadway Fill at Charleston = 1 ft 1% Maximum Grade Length = NOT FEASIBLE 2% Maximum Grade Length = 6825 ft Wilton Ave Constraints: Limit impacts to properties at Meadow and Charleston Temporary Track (Shoofly) Length with 2%= 7600 ft Monroe Dr

8 Driveways

9

10 Questions?


Download ppt "Rail Program Management Services Review Grade Separation Recommended Ideas Palo Alto Rail Committee Meeting 08.15.18 …….."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google